Risk Perception and Responses Among Private Forest Owners in Sweden

Forest risk management influences economic, recreation, and ecological values in the forest. To improve the understanding of forest risk management among private forest owners, in-depth interviews were carried out with 20 individual private forest owners in Sweden. Within an environmental stress framework, the forest owners’ overall perception of a range of risks, or threats, that they perceive may damage their forest or harm them as a forest owner was uncovered. Overall, results revealed that the owners generally were not very concerned about forest risks. Nevertheless, natural hazards, such as storms and fires, and societal processes including political decisions concerning for example environmental regulations were mentioned among the most serious threats. Proactive as well as reactive strategies were used to deal with the risks—for example, insurance and forest management strategies. Because climate change is a potentially new risk that may affect forest owners, the owners’ climate change perceptions were explored. The owners emphasised uncertainties and displayed a rather optimistic view of the impacts of climate change on their forests now and in the future. Two dimensions—risk tolerance and perceived control over risks—characterised forest owners’ risk perception and responses. In addition, the susceptibility of the forest, previous risk experience, forest values, and the extent to which the owner is dependent on the forest—for example, economically—were relevant for understanding how risks are evaluated.

[1]  T. Hujala,et al.  Boosters of and barriers to smooth communication in family forest owners’ decision making , 2008 .

[2]  Margarida Tomé,et al.  Climate Change: Believing and Seeing Implies Adapting , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  A. Punt,et al.  Communicating climate change: Climate change risk perceptions and rock lobster fishers, Tasmania , 2012 .

[4]  A. Lawrence,et al.  Is the private forest sector adapting to climate change? A study of forest managers in north Wales , 2014, Annals of Forest Science.

[5]  J. Swim,et al.  Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. , 2011, The American psychologist.

[6]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[7]  Lori Peek,et al.  The Effect of Proximity to Hurricanes Katrina and Rita on Subsequent Hurricane Outlook and Optimistic Bias , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[8]  K. Blennow.  Adaptation of forest management to climate change among private individual forest owners in Sweden , 2012 .

[9]  L. Eriksson,et al.  A typology of small-scale private forest owners in Sweden , 2006 .

[10]  T. Earle,et al.  Thinking Aloud about Trust: A Protocol Analysis of Trust in Risk Management , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[11]  M. Andersson.  Assessing non-industrial private forest owners’ attitudes to risk: Do owner and property characteristics matter? , 2012 .

[12]  Virna Vaneza Gutiérrez,et al.  Trust, acceptance and knowledge of technological and environmental hazards in Chile , 2008 .

[13]  Thomas Dietz,et al.  Personal Values, Beliefs, and Ecological Risk Perception , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[14]  Elias Mossialos,et al.  Optimism and the perceptions of new risks , 2009 .

[15]  E. Weber.  Experience-Based and Description-Based Perceptions of Long-Term Risk: Why Global Warming does not Scare us (Yet) , 2006 .

[16]  Ola Sallnäs,et al.  Risk Perception Among Non-industrial Private Forest Owners , 2002 .

[17]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[18]  M. Marzano,et al.  Recreational use of forests and disturbance of wildlife - a literature review. , 2012 .

[19]  Till Neeff,et al.  Seventy-seven years of natural disturbances in a mountain forest area—the influence of storm, snow, and insect damage analysed with a long- term time series , 2008 .

[20]  Martin Beniston,et al.  Climate Risks and Their Impact on Agriculture and Forests in Switzerland , 2006 .

[21]  John W. Creswell,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2010 .

[22]  I. Ajzen.  The theory of planned behavior , 1991 .

[23]  David O'Hare,et al.  Risk tolerance and pilot involvement in hazardous events and flight into adverse weather. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[24]  L. Lönnstedt,et al.  Return and Risk in Timberland and Other Investment Alternatives of NIPF Owners , 2000 .

[25]  A. Twycross.  Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Research design: qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches Creswell John W Sage 320 £29 0761924426 0761924426 [Formula: see text]. , 2004, Nurse researcher.

[26]  N. Weinstein.  Effects of personal experience on self-protective behavior. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[27]  P. Boxall,et al.  The role of social psychological and social structural variables in environmental activism: an example of the forest sector ☆ , 2003 .

[28]  Erkki Tomppo,et al.  A report to the food and agriculture organization of the united nations (FAO) in support of sampling study for National Forestry Resources Monitoring and Assessment (NAFORMA) in Tanzania , 2010 .

[29]  Michael M. Zwick.  Risk as perceived by the German public: pervasive risks and “switching” risks , 2005 .

[30]  P. Slovic.  Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[31]  A. Spence,et al.  Uncertain climate: An investigation into public scepticism about anthropogenic climate change , 2011 .

[32]  Nicholas E. Flores,et al.  Insights Into Wildfire Mitigation Decisions Among Wildland–Urban Interface Residents , 2006 .

[33]  Robert E. O'Connor,et al.  Determinants of Risk Perceptions of a Hazardous Waste Site , 1992 .

[34]  P. Gustafson.  Gender Differences in Risk Perception: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives , 1998, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[35]  Eva Ritter,et al.  The Values and Objectives of Private Forest Owners and Their Influence on Forestry Behaviour: The Implications for Entrepreneurship , 2007, Small-scale Forestry.

[36]  R. Stedman.  Risk and Climate Change: Perceptions of Key Policy Actors in Canada , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[37]  T. Grothmann,et al.  People at Risk of Flooding: Why Some Residents Take Precautionary Action While Others Do Not , 2006 .

[38]  B. McFarlane,et al.  An Examination of the Influence of Hazard Experience on Wildfire Risk Perceptions and Adoption of Mitigation Measures , 2009 .

[39]  Susanna Öhman,et al.  Views of Risk in Sweden: Global Fatalism and Local Control — An Empirical Investigation of Ulrich Beck's Theory of New Risks , 2007 .

[40]  Laura Johnson,et al.  How Many Interviews Are Enough? , 2006 .

[41]  Gudbrand Lien,et al.  Perceived risk sources and strategies to cope with risk among forest owners with and without off-property work in eastern Norway , 2007 .

[42]  N. Bronfman,et al.  Risk Perception in a Developing Country: The Case of Chile , 2003, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[43]  Terrence Bush.  Biodiversity and Sectoral Responsibility in the Development of Swedish Forestry Policy, 1988–1993 , 2010, Scandinavian journal of history.