Current Situation of Design Criteria for Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis

This paper presents the literature review on the design criteria for intervertebral disc prosthesis. The design criteria relate to the design features that intervertebral prosthesis must accomplish (i.e. fixation to bones, spine mobility, energy absorption and etcetera). The need to improve the performance has led to changes in the features which reflect in the current design criteria.Currently, the disc prosthesis technology is experiencing a generational change. The first generation was thoroughly studied while the second generation is in the clinical tests stage. During the time the first generation prostheses were applied in patients there was not a clear trend in the clinical results which produced a lack of trust and reliability in the performance of the disc prosthesis. The changes in the design features of one generation compared to the next generation are based in the deepening in the knowledge of the problem and the results obtained with the first generation prostheses.Some design criteria were identified for the first generation. These criteria were not completely characterized since there was not enough information to be used by the designer. This lack of characterization of most design criteria produced many different versions without a clear focus which help to define the basic design features of disc prostheses. This document presents the necessary information to thoroughly characterize the design criteria outlining the missing information for the design criteria found. An analysis is done of the design criteria in the second generation of prosthesis.Finally if the information contained in the design criteria is enough, the clinical results would be better focused to achieve a more repeatable, reproducible and reliable process for a total disc intervertebral prosthesis replacement as now is considered the vertebral fusion, this is a gold standard.Copyright © 2013 by ASME

[1]  B. Freeman,et al.  Total disc replacement in the lumbar spine: a systematic review of the literature , 2006, European Spine Journal.

[2]  T. Hedman,et al.  Design of an Intervertebral Disc Prosthesis , 1991, Spine.

[3]  H. Serhan,et al.  Motion-preserving technologies for degenerative lumbar spine: The past, present, and future horizons , 2011, International Journal of Spine Surgery.

[4]  U. Fernström Arthroplasty with intercorporal endoprothesis in herniated disc and in painful disc. , 1966, Acta chirurgica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[5]  J. Ziman Technological Innovation as an Evolutionary Process , 2003 .

[6]  S. Garfin,et al.  History and evolution of disc replacement. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[7]  E. Wai,et al.  Disk replacement arthroplasties: can the success of hip and knee replacements be repeated in the spine? , 2003 .

[8]  L. Voronov,et al.  Clinical Factors that May Affect Outcome in Lumbar Total Disc Replacement. What Is the Evidence , 2010 .

[9]  P. McAfee,et al.  The Artificial Disc , 2003, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[10]  H M Mayer,et al.  Total lumbar disc replacement. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  C. Slipman,et al.  A historical review and current perspective on the intervertebral disc prosthesis. , 2003, Pain physician.

[12]  H. Farfan,et al.  Instability of the lumbar spine. , 1982, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[13]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Toward a Systematic Framework for Research on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Industrial Change , 2005 .

[14]  Vijay K Goel,et al.  Artificial disc prosthesis: design concepts and criteria. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[15]  Ali Fahir Ozer,et al.  Dynamic stabilization of the spine: a new classification system. , 2010, Turkish neurosurgery.

[16]  Roberto Fontana,et al.  Mapping technological trajectories as patent citation networks. An application to data communication standards , 2009 .

[17]  Keita Ito,et al.  Design of next generation total disk replacements. , 2012, Journal of biomechanics.