Bayesian Poroelastic Aquifer Characterization From InSAR Surface Deformation Data. 2. Quantifying the Uncertainty

Uncertainty quantification of groundwater (GW) aquifer parameters is critical for efficient management and sustainable extraction of GW resources. These uncertainties are introduced by the data, model, and prior information on the parameters. Here we develop a Bayesian inversion framework that uses Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) surface deformation data to infer the laterally heterogeneous permeability of a transient linear poroelastic model of a confined GW aquifer. The Bayesian solution of this inverse problem takes the form of a posterior probability density of the permeability. Exploring this posterior using classical Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods is computationally prohibitive due to the large dimension of the discretized permeability field and the expense of solving the poroelastic forward problem. However, in many partial differential equation (PDE)-based Bayesian inversion problems, the data are only informative in a few directions in parameter space. For the poroelasticity problem, we prove this property theoretically for a one-dimensional problem and demonstrate it numerically for a three-dimensional aquifer model. We design a generalized preconditioned Crank–Nicolson (gpCN) MCMC method that exploits this intrinsic low dimensionality by using a low-rank based Laplace approximation of the posterior as a proposal, which we build scalably. The feasibility of our approach is demonstrated through a real GW aquifer test in Nevada. The inherently two dimensional nature of InSAR surface deformation data informs a sufficient number of modes of the permeability field to allow detection of major structures within the aquifer, significantly reducing the uncertainty in the pressure and the displacement quantities of interest.

[1]  G. Stadler,et al.  Joint inversion in coupled quasi‐static poroelasticity , 2014 .

[2]  James Martin,et al.  A Stochastic Newton MCMC Method for Large-Scale Statistical Inverse Problems with Application to Seismic Inversion , 2012, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[3]  James Martin,et al.  A Computational Framework for Infinite-Dimensional Bayesian Inverse Problems Part I: The Linearized Case, with Application to Global Seismic Inversion , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[4]  M. Biot General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[5]  T. Burbey Three-dimensional deformation and strain induced by municipal pumping, Part 2: Numerical analysis , 2006 .

[6]  D. Oliver,et al.  Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review , 2011 .

[7]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady-state conditions: 2 , 1986 .

[8]  Georg Stadler,et al.  Extreme-scale UQ for Bayesian inverse problems governed by PDEs , 2012, 2012 International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis.

[9]  Bart G. van Bloemen Waanders,et al.  Fast Algorithms for Bayesian Uncertainty Quantification in Large-Scale Linear Inverse Problems Based on Low-Rank Partial Hessian Approximations , 2011, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[10]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[11]  Georg Stadler,et al.  Scalable and efficient algorithms for the propagation of uncertainty from data through inference to prediction for large-scale problems, with application to flow of the Antarctic ice sheet , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[12]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  A Reassessment of the Groundwater Inverse Problem , 1996 .

[13]  Timothy T. Eaton,et al.  On the importance of geological heterogeneity for flow simulation , 2006 .

[14]  R. Tomás,et al.  Radar interferometry techniques for the study of ground subsidence phenomena: a review of practical issues through cases in Spain , 2013, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[15]  James Irving,et al.  On uncertainty quantification in hydrogeology and hydrogeophysics , 2017 .

[16]  Nicola Castelletto,et al.  A fully coupled 3-D mixed finite element model of Biot consolidation , 2010, J. Comput. Phys..

[17]  M. Bierkens,et al.  Global modeling of withdrawal, allocation and consumptive use of surface water and groundwater resources , 2013 .

[18]  C. Zheng,et al.  Groundwater-pumping optimization for land-subsidence control in Beijing plain, China , 2018, Hydrogeology Journal.

[19]  James J. Butler,et al.  Inherent Limitations of Hydraulic Tomography , 2010, Ground water.

[20]  G. Roberts,et al.  MCMC Methods for Functions: ModifyingOld Algorithms to Make Them Faster , 2012, 1202.0709.

[21]  Fabio Rocca,et al.  Submillimeter Accuracy of InSAR Time Series: Experimental Validation , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[22]  Tiangang Cui,et al.  Dimension-independent likelihood-informed MCMC , 2014, J. Comput. Phys..

[23]  James Martin,et al.  A Computational Framework for Infinite-Dimensional Bayesian Inverse Problems, Part II: Stochastic Newton MCMC with Application to Ice Sheet Flow Inverse Problems , 2013, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[24]  Mary F. Wheeler,et al.  Overcoming the problem of locking in linear elasticity and poroelasticity: an heuristic approach , 2009 .

[25]  H. Rue,et al.  An explicit link between Gaussian fields and Gaussian Markov random fields: the stochastic partial differential equation approach , 2011 .

[26]  M. Bierkens,et al.  Nonsustainable groundwater sustaining irrigation: A global assessment , 2012 .

[27]  Omar Ghattas,et al.  hIPPYlib: An Extensible Software Framework for Large-Scale Inverse Problems , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..

[28]  Emma M. Hill,et al.  Three-dimensional deformation and strain induced by municipal pumping, part 1: Analysis of field data , 2006 .

[29]  Eloise Kendy,et al.  Groundwater depletion: A global problem , 2005 .

[30]  Omar Ghattas,et al.  Bayesian Poroelastic Aquifer Characterization From InSAR Surface Deformation Data. Part I: Maximum A Posteriori Estimate , 2020, Water Resources Research.

[31]  Jichun Wu,et al.  Land subsidence in China , 2005 .

[32]  Andrew M. Stuart,et al.  Geometric MCMC for infinite-dimensional inverse problems , 2016, J. Comput. Phys..

[33]  A. Tarantola,et al.  Inverse problems = Quest for information , 1982 .

[34]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 3. Application to Synthetic and Field Data , 1986 .

[35]  Gideon Simpson,et al.  Algorithms for Kullback-Leibler Approximation of Probability Measures in Infinite Dimensions , 2014, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[36]  Devin L. Galloway,et al.  Impacts of land subsidence caused by withdrawal of underground fluids in the United States , 2005 .

[37]  M. Bierkens,et al.  Global depletion of groundwater resources , 2010 .

[38]  O. Ghattas,et al.  On Bayesian A- and D-optimal experimental designs in infinite dimensions , 2014, 1408.6323.

[39]  J. Famiglietti The global groundwater crisis , 2014 .

[40]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 1. Maximum Likelihood Method Incorporating Prior Information , 1986 .

[41]  Tan Bui-Thanh,et al.  A Gentle Tutorial on Statistical Inversion using the Bayesian Paradigm , 2012 .