Obtaining reactor-relevant divertor conditions in tokamaks

It is argued that the paramount boundary plasma issue for DT reactors is likely to be the erosion wear of the plasma facing components, PFCs, and that a number of potential solutions all require the achievement of not only low temperature (10 eV) but also high density (1021 m−3) in the divertor. Estimates are made of the minimum heating power, Pheat, required to achieve a divertor target temperature of Tt = 5 eV and density nt > 1021 m−3, based on four recent hypotheses or scalings for the width of the power footprint on the target, λqt. Each of these result in predictions of how the required minimum Pheat depends on device size, namely as R, R3/2 or R2. The absolute magnitude for the required values of minimum Pheat is found not to vary significantly among the four power scalings; for the most part a factor of order ~2 for a significant range of R. The four hypotheses/scalings for λqt are empirically based; however, they draw on measurements made in tokamaks that did not have divertors operating primarily under these conditions. In order to establish if any of these power scalings are applicable, they are compared with measurements from a set of DIII-D discharges with high nt ~ 0.35 × 1021 at 5 eV. It is found that all four power scalings match the experimental measurements to within the uncertainties. The main objective is to determine what power is needed to achieve the required divertor conditions in future devices, for both reactor and simulator tokamaks, and therefore the approximate agreement of the four, strongly empirical, power scalings increases confidence that this may be possible.

[1]  D. C. Griffin,et al.  Electron-impact ionization of atomic ions in the W isonuclear sequence , 2005 .

[2]  D. N. Hill,et al.  Comparison of upstream Te profiles with downstream heat flux profiles and their implications on parallel heat transport in the SOL in DIII-D , 2010 .

[3]  T. W. Petrie,et al.  DISTRIBUTED DIVERTOR RADIATION THROUGH CONVECTION IN DIII-D , 1997 .

[4]  Jeffrey N. Brooks,et al.  Near‐surface sputtered particle transport for an oblique incidence magnetic field plasma , 1990 .

[5]  W. Fundamenski,et al.  Modelling of ELM-averaged power exhaust on JET using the EDGE2D code with variable transport coefficients , 2007 .

[6]  P. Stangeby The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices , 2000 .

[7]  K. F. Mast,et al.  Tungsten as target material in fusion devices , 1996 .

[8]  S. Krasheninnikov Kinetics of Tokamak Edge Plasmas: Progress and Problems , 1994 .

[9]  C. Hsieh,et al.  Initial operation of the divertor Thompson scattering diagnostic on DIII-D , 1996 .

[10]  J. N. Davidson,et al.  Electric sheath and presheath in a collisionless, finite ion temperature plasma , 1980 .

[11]  D. Elder,et al.  OSM-EIRENE modeling of neutral pressures in the Alcator C-Mod divertor , 2005 .

[12]  Y. Igitkhanov Impurity Transport at Arbitrary Densities in the Divertor Plasma , 1988 .

[13]  A. Kirschner,et al.  Simulation of the plasma-wall interaction in a tokamak with the Monte Carlo code ERO-TEXTOR , 2000 .

[14]  D. Ryutov Geometrical properties of a “snowflake” divertor , 2007 .

[15]  D. N. Hill,et al.  Multi-Machine Scaling of the Divertor Peak Heat Flux and Width for L-Mode and H-Mode Discharges , 1999 .

[16]  A. Kallenbach,et al.  Multi-machine comparisons of H-mode separatrix densities and edge profile behaviour in the ITPA SOL and Divertor Physics Topical Group , 2005 .

[17]  D. N. Hill,et al.  Radiative divertor plasmas with convection in DIII-D , 1998 .

[18]  R. Chodura,et al.  Plasma–wall transition in an oblique magnetic field , 1982 .

[19]  P. Stangeby Interpretation of Langmuir, heat-flux, deposition, trapping and gridded energy analyser probe data for impure plasmas , 1987 .

[20]  D. Whyte,et al.  The relation between upstream density and temperature widths in the scrape-off layer and the power width in an attached divertor , 2010 .

[21]  P. Valanju,et al.  On heat loading, novel divertors, and fusion reactors , 2006 .

[22]  W. Eckstein,et al.  Calculated Sputtering, Reflection and Range Values , 2002 .

[23]  Ian H. Hutchinson,et al.  Similarity in divertor studies , 1996 .

[24]  W. H. Meyer,et al.  2D tomography with bolometry in DIII‐Da) , 1995 .

[25]  D. Whyte Plasma-Surface Interaction Studies on DIII-D and Their Implications for Next-Step Fusion Experiments , 2005 .

[26]  M. Kocan,et al.  Comparison of scrape-off layer profiles in outboard-versus inboard-limited plasmas in Tore Supra , 2010 .

[27]  L. L. Lao,et al.  The ARIES-AT advanced tokamak, Advanced technology fusion power plant , 2006 .

[28]  K. Tokunaga,et al.  The effects of high fluence mixed-species (deuterium, helium, beryllium) plasma interactions with tungsten , 2009 .