DMFC anode polarization: Experimental analysis and model validation

Anode two-phase flow has an important influence on DMFC performance and methanol crossover. In order to elucidate two-phase flow influence on anode performance, in this work, anode polarization is investigated combining experimental and modelling approach. A systematic experimental analysis of operating conditions influence on anode polarization is presented. Hysteresis due to operating condition is observed; experimental results suggest that it arises from methanol accumulation and has to be considered in evaluating DMFC performances and measurements reproducibility. A model of DMFC anode polarization is presented and utilised as tool to investigate anode two-phase flow. The proposed analysis permits one to produce a confident interpretation of the main involved phenomena. In particular, it confirms that methanol electro-oxidation kinetics is weakly dependent on methanol concentration and that methanol transport in gas phase produces an important contribution in anode feeding. Moreover, it emphasises the possibility to optimise anode flow rate in order to improve DMFC performance and reduce methanol crossover.

[1]  David Mautner Himmelblau,et al.  Process analysis by statistical methods , 1970 .

[2]  Andrea Casalegno,et al.  Experimental analysis of methanol cross-over in a direct methanol fuel cell , 2007 .

[3]  Hongtan Liu,et al.  A three-dimensional two-phase flow model for a liquid-fed direct methanol fuel cell , 2007 .

[4]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Liquid-Feed Direct Methanol Fuel Cells , 2003 .

[5]  D. Stolten,et al.  Novel method for investigation of two-phase flow in liquid feed direct methanol fuel cells using an aqueous H2O2 solution , 2004 .

[6]  A. A. Kulikovsky.  Model of the flow with bubbles in the anode channel and performance of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2005 .

[7]  Kaspar Andreas Friedrich,et al.  Performance and methanol permeation of direct methanol fuel cells: dependence on operating conditions and on electrode structure , 2004 .

[8]  Hang Guo,et al.  2D analytical model of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2004 .

[9]  Eugene S. Smotkin,et al.  Methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cells: a link between power and energy density , 2002 .

[10]  S. Woo,et al.  Analysis of the polarization of a direct methanol fuel cell using a pseudo-reversible hydrogen reference electrode , 2006 .

[11]  S.Lj Gojković,et al.  Kinetic study of methanol oxidation on carbon-supported PtRu electrocatalyst , 2003 .

[12]  Angelika Heinzel,et al.  A review of the state-of-the-art of the methanol crossover in direct methanol fuel cells , 1999 .

[13]  Klaus Wippermann,et al.  Experimental evaluation and semi-empirical modeling of U/I characteristics and methanol permeation of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2004 .

[14]  Qiang Ye,et al.  In situ visualization study of CO2 gas bubble behavior in DMFC anode flow fields , 2005 .

[15]  Keith Scott,et al.  Performance and modelling of a direct methanol solid polymer electrolyte fuel cell , 1997 .

[16]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Recent developments of the measurement of the methanol permeation in a direct methanol fuel cell , 2002 .

[17]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Electrochemical and flow characterization of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2004 .

[18]  A. A. Kulikovsky,et al.  Two-dimensional numerical modelling of a direct methanol fuel cell , 2000 .

[19]  Antonino S. Aricò,et al.  DMFCs: From Fundamental Aspects to Technology Development , 2001 .

[20]  Rong Chen,et al.  Mathematical modeling of a passive-feed DMFC with heat transfer effect , 2005 .

[21]  Hongtan Liu,et al.  A three-dimensional mathematical model for liquid-fed direct methanol fuel cells , 2006 .

[22]  Kai Sundmacher,et al.  Rigorous dynamic model of a direct methanol fuel cell based on Maxwell–Stefan mass transport equations and a Flory–Huggins activity model: Formulation and experimental validation , 2005 .

[23]  J. Divisek,et al.  Process engineering of the direct methanol fuel cell , 2000 .