Collinear features impair visual detection by rats.

We measure rats' ability to detect an oriented visual target grating located between two flanking stimuli ("flankers"). Flankers varied in contrast, orientation, angular position, and sign. Rats are impaired at detecting visual targets with collinear flankers, compared to configurations where flankers differ from the target in orientation or angular position. In particular, rats are more likely to miss the target when flankers are collinear. The same impairment is found even when the flanker luminance was sign-reversed relative to the target. These findings suggest that contour alignment alters visual processing in rats, despite their lack of orientation columns in the visual cortex. This is the first report that the arrangement of visual features relative to each other affects visual behavior in rats. To provide a conceptual framework for our findings, we relate our stimuli to a contrast normalization model of early visual processing. We suggest a pattern-sensitive generalization of the model that could account for a collinear deficit. These experiments were performed using a novel method for automated high-throughput training and testing of visual behavior in rodents.

[1]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Circuits for Local and Global Signal Integration in Primary Visual Cortex , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Hans Strasburger,et al.  Assessing spatial vision — automated measurement of the contrast-sensitivity function in the hooded rat , 2000, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[3]  Z. Mainen,et al.  Speed and accuracy of olfactory discrimination in the rat , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  M. Morgan,et al.  Facilitation from collinear flanks is cancelled by non-collinear flanks , 2000, Vision Research.

[5]  J. Movshon,et al.  Selectivity and spatial distribution of signals from the receptive field surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  R. Douglas,et al.  Perception of visual motion coherence by rats and mice , 2006, Vision Research.

[7]  R. Douglas,et al.  Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats , 2000, Vision Research.

[8]  William Bialek,et al.  Statistics of Natural Images: Scaling in the Woods , 1993, NIPS.

[9]  U. Polat,et al.  Lateral interactions between spatial channels: Suppression and facilitation revealed by lateral masking experiments , 1993, Vision Research.

[10]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[11]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  The “silent” surround of V1 receptive fields: theory and experiments , 2003, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[12]  Gonzalo H. Otazu,et al.  Engaging in an auditory task suppresses responses in auditory cortex , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  J A Solomon,et al.  Texture interactions determine perceived contrast , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M. Cannon,et al.  A model for inhibitory lateral interaction effects in perceived contrast , 1996, Vision Research.

[15]  Michael D Lee,et al.  BayesSDT: Software for Bayesian inference with signal detection theory , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[16]  Aapo Hyvärinen,et al.  Collinear context (and learning) change the profile of the perceptual filter , 2006, Vision Research.

[17]  G. H. Jacobs,et al.  Cone-based vision of rats for ultraviolet and visible lights. , 2001, The Journal of experimental biology.

[18]  H. C. Nothdurft,et al.  Texture segmentation and pop-out from orientation contrast , 1991, Vision Research.

[19]  Stephen D. Van Hooser,et al.  Lack of Patchy Horizontal Connectivity in Primary Visual Cortex of a Mammal without Orientation Maps , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  C. Tyler,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interaction fields of flankers revealed by contrast-masking functions. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[21]  Jeffrey S. Perry,et al.  Edge co-occurrence in natural images predicts contour grouping performance , 2001, Vision Research.

[22]  P. Dayan,et al.  Perceptual organization in the tilt illusion. , 2009, Journal of vision.

[23]  H. Heffner,et al.  Visual factors in sound localization in mammals , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  A. B. Bonds Role of Inhibition in the Specification of Orientation Selectivity of Cells in the Cat Striate Cortex , 1989, Visual Neuroscience.

[25]  D. Sagi,et al.  Isolating Excitatory and Inhibitory Nonlinear Spatial Interactions Involved in Contrast Detection * * Part of this paper was presented at the 17th ECVP conference, Eindhoven, The Netherlands (September 1994). , 1996, Vision Research.

[26]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Topography of contextual modulations mediated by short-range interactions in primary visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[27]  C. Gilbert,et al.  On a common circle: natural scenes and Gestalt rules. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  Sooyoung Chung,et al.  Functional imaging with cellular resolution reveals precise micro-architecture in visual cortex , 2005, Nature.

[29]  C. Koch,et al.  Flanker effects in peripheral contrast discrimination—psychophysics and modeling , 2001, Vision Research.

[30]  R. Shapley,et al.  Nonlinear spatial summation and the contrast gain control of cat retinal ganglion cells. , 1979, The Journal of physiology.

[31]  P. Lennie,et al.  Early and Late Mechanisms of Surround Suppression in Striate Cortex of Macaque , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  A. M. Sillito,et al.  Orientation sensitive elements in the corticofugal influence on centre-surround interactions in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  Ryan C Kelly,et al.  Dynamics of response to perceptual pop-out stimuli in macaque V1. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  David Fitzpatrick,et al.  Emergent Properties of Layer 2/3 Neurons Reflect the Collinear Arrangement of Horizontal Connections in Tree Shrew Visual Cortex , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[35]  Gerald H. Jacobs,et al.  Spatial contrast sensitivity in albino and pigmented rats , 1979, Vision Research.

[36]  U. Polat,et al.  Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold , 1998, Nature.

[37]  Yoshimichi Ejima,et al.  Apparent contrast of a sinusoidal grating in the simultaneous presence of peripheral gratings , 1985, Vision Research.

[38]  Uri Polat,et al.  The relationship between the subjective and objective aspects of visual filling-in , 2007, Vision Research.

[39]  Preeti Verghese,et al.  Collinear facilitation is largely uncertainty reduction. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[40]  D. Heeger Normalization of cell responses in cat striate cortex , 1992, Visual Neuroscience.

[41]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Contour Saliency in Primary Visual Cortex , 2006, Neuron.

[42]  Denis G. Pelli,et al.  ECVP '07 Abstracts , 2007, Perception.

[43]  C W Tyler,et al.  Spatial pattern summation is phase-insensitive in the fovea but not in the periphery. , 1999, Spatial vision.

[44]  Dale Purves,et al.  Natural-scene geometry predicts the perception of angles and line orientation. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[45]  A. Cowey,et al.  The retinal origin of uncrossed optic nerve fibres in rats and their role in visual discrimination , 1979, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  L. Saksida,et al.  The touchscreen cognitive testing method for rodents: how to get the best out of your rat. , 2008, Learning & memory.

[47]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[48]  James J DiCarlo,et al.  A rodent model for the study of invariant visual object recognition , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  W. Geisler Visual perception and the statistical properties of natural scenes. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[50]  H. Neumann,et al.  A recurrent model of contour integration in primary visual cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[51]  D. Heeger,et al.  Measurement and modeling of center-surround suppression and enhancement , 2001, Vision Research.

[52]  T. Wiesel,et al.  Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[53]  C. Koch,et al.  A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention , 2000, Vision Research.

[54]  Alan Agresti,et al.  Simple and Effective Confidence Intervals for Proportions and Differences of Proportions Result from Adding Two Successes and Two Failures , 2000 .

[55]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Natural signal statistics and sensory gain control , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  R F Hess,et al.  Relationship between facilitation at threshold and suprathreshold contour integration. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[57]  Edward H. Adelson,et al.  Motion illusions as optimal percepts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[58]  E Peli,et al.  Luminance artifacts of cathode-ray tube displays for vision research. , 2001, Spatial vision.

[59]  Jon Driver,et al.  lateral interactions , 2004 .

[60]  H Barlow,et al.  Redundancy reduction revisited , 2001, Network.

[61]  Heather J. Chisum,et al.  The contribution of vertical and horizontal connections to the receptive field center and surround in V1 , 2004, Neural Networks.

[62]  J. Movshon,et al.  Linearity and Normalization in Simple Cells of the Macaque Primary Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[63]  Kathryn J Jeffery,et al.  Do rats use shape to solve "shape discriminations"? , 2006, Learning & memory.