Extraterrestrial sample return is a growing component of solar system exploration. Currently, four missions, Stardust, 1 Muses-C, 2 Genesis, and Mars Sample Return, are under development that employ sample return as a prime component of the mission architecture. Respectively, these missions will return samples from the tail of a comet, an asteroid, the solar wind, and, Mars. An important component of these missions and the focus of this paper is the design of the sample return capsule (SRC). The purpose of the SRC is to safely return to Earth any gathered samples for terrestrial analysis. The two major design constraints for any SRC are as follows: 1) it must be able to survive a high-speed Earth entry (11 km/s to as a high as 15 km/s), 2) the mass of the SRC must be as small as possible. Because the SRC mass is carried from Earth to the sample sight and back, the SRC mass is a strong driver in the mission mass budget. Further, for the Mars Sample Return Capsule, planetary protection is another constraint. For this capsule, the probability of planetary contamination at Earth due to an SRC failure at entry must be minimal. For an SRC, a possible failure mechanism is severe local heating as a result of cavities and or protuberances in the SRC forebody heatshield. For example, the Apollo Command Module had a number of cavities and protuberances as part of the baseline designs Wind-tunnel tests of models containing small cavities and protuberances showed severe local heating augmentations in the vicinity of these surface discontinuities.4-5 As another example, the Genesis SRC forebody heat-shield contains penetrations (cavities) to mount the vehicle to the carrier bus. It is expected that these penetrations will also experience a severe local heating environment. A concern is that the large thermal gradients may produce sufficient thermal stress to cause local mechanical failure of the heatshield. Penetrations to the forebody heat-shield can also result from damage at vehicle integration, during launch, or during transportation of the sample return capsule from earth to the sample site and back. For example, the Starting SRC was damaged near the shoulder during the heatshield integration process producing a local surface discontinuity. Also, the Starting SRC traverses through the tail of a comet and is in space for 7 years. Thus, damage to the heatshield as a result of micrometeroid impact is a concern. Finally, it is difficult to characterize the effects of these potential heatshield singularities with ground-test facilities. Either detailed simulation or a dedicated flight test is required.
[1]
J. L. Hunt,et al.
Effects of several ramp-fairing, umbilical, and pad configurations on aerodynamic heating to Apollo command module at Mach 8
,
1968
.
[2]
Dave Olynick.
Aerothermodynamics of the Stardust sample return capsule
,
1998
.
[3]
Yih-Kanq Chen,et al.
Forebody TPS sizing with radiation and ablation for the Stardust Sample Return Capsule
,
1997
.
[4]
Michael E. Tauber,et al.
AEROTHERMODYNAMICS OF THE STARDUST SAMPLE RETURN CAPSULE
,
1998
.
[5]
Dean Kontinos,et al.
Numerical simulation of metallic TPS panel bowing
,
1998
.
[6]
Takashi Abe,et al.
Research on the heatshield for MUSES-C Earth reentry
,
1998
.
[7]
Dean Kontinos,et al.
Surface heating effects of X-33 vehicle TPS panel bowing, steps, and gaps
,
1998
.
[8]
Yih-Kanq Chen,et al.
Wake flow calculations with ablation for the Stardust Sample Return Capsule
,
1997
.