Implementation of hybrid Kanban-CONWIP system: a case study

Purpose Shop floor control systems are generally major points of discussion in production planning and control literature. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how lean production control principles can be used in a make-to-order (MTO) job shop, where the volume is typically low and there is high variety. This paper examines the procedures involved in implementing a constant work-in-process (CONWIP)/Kanban hybrid system in the shop floor environment and also provides insights and guidelines on the implementation of a hybrid system in a high-variety/low-volume environment. Design/methodology/approach The authors review literature on Kanban, CONWIP, and CONWIP/Kanban hybrid systems to analyze how lean production control principles can be used in a MTO job shop. The second part focuses on the process of implementation. Using a case study of a manufacturer of electromechanical components for valve monitoring and controls, the paper describes how the operation is transformed by for more efficient shop floor control systems. Real experiments are used to compare pre- and post-improvement performance. Findings The study shows that the proposed hybrid Kanban-CONWIP system reduced the cycle time and achieved an increase of 38 percent in inventory turnover. The empirical results from this pilot study provide useful managerial insights for a benchmarking analysis of the actions to be taken into consideration by companies that have similar manufacturing systems. Research limitations/implications The statistic generalization of the results is impossible due to the use of a single case method of study. Originality/value This paper provides insights and guidelines on the implementation of a hybrid system in a high-variety/low-volume environment. The literature on real applications of hybrid CONWIP/Kanban by case study is limited.

[1]  R. Yin Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[2]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  The Toyota Production System , 1984 .

[3]  Joshua Prakash,et al.  Modified CONWIP systems: a review and classification , 2014 .

[4]  Taiichi Ohno,et al.  Toyota Production System : Beyond Large-Scale Production , 1988 .

[5]  Taho Yang,et al.  An evolutionary-simulation approach for the optimization of multi-constant work-in-process strategy--A case study , 2007 .

[6]  Sanjay Sharma,et al.  Selection of a pull production control policy under different demand situations for a manufacturing system by AHP-algorithm , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  Wendell G. Gilland A simulation study comparing performance of CONWIP and bottleneck-based release rules , 2002 .

[8]  Joshua Prakash,et al.  Implementation of hybrid parallel kanban-CONWIP system: A case study , 2014 .

[9]  Asbjoern M. Bonvik,et al.  A comparison of production-line control mechanisms , 1997 .

[10]  新郷 重夫,et al.  A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint , 1989 .

[11]  Bart L. MacCarthy,et al.  A multi-dimensional classification of production systems for the design and selection of production planning and control systems , 2000 .

[12]  David L. Woodruff,et al.  CONWIP: a pull alternative to kanban , 1990 .

[13]  M. Fisher What is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product , 1997 .

[14]  Magnus Wiktorsson,et al.  POLCA and CONWIP performance in a divergent production line: an automotive case study , 2013 .

[15]  Jack P. C. Kleijnen,et al.  An evolutionary approach to select a pull system among Kanban, Conwip and Hybrid , 2000, J. Intell. Manuf..

[16]  Jose M. Framinan,et al.  The CONWIP production control system: Review and research issues , 2003 .

[17]  John A. Muckstadt,et al.  A comparison of alternative kanban control mechanisms. I. Background and structural results , 1995 .

[18]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[19]  Muris Lage Junior,et al.  Adaptações ao sistema kanban: revisão, classificação, análise e avaliação , 2008 .

[20]  Dingwei Wang,et al.  Simulation study of CONWIP for a cold rolling plant , 1998 .

[21]  L. Ellram THE USE OF THE CASE STUDY METHOD IN LOGISTICS RESEARCH , 1996 .

[22]  Yi Wang,et al.  A double decoupling postponement approach for integrated mixed flow production systems , 2015, Kybernetes.

[23]  Jannes Slomp,et al.  A lean production control system for high-variety/low-volume environments: a case study implementation , 2009 .