Evaluation of Rutting Behaviour of Geocell Reinforced Sand Subgrades Under Repeated Loading

This paper summarizes the results from a series of large scale cyclic model load tests on geocell reinforced and unreinforced homogeneous sand subgrades. The sand subgrades are prepared at 70 % relative density thru pluviation technic in a large steel tank measuring 1 m3. A cyclic load of 0.7 and 7 kN was applied on a circular steel plate of 150 mm diameter to replicate a portion of load transfer from an equivalent single axle wheel load (ESAL) on the sand subgrade. The cyclic load was applied through a double acting dynamic hydraulic 100 kN actuator. A series of tests were conducted to study the effects of width and height of a geocell reinforcement on the cyclic behavior of sand subgrades. The performance improvement is quantified in terms of traffic benefit ratios (TBR), cumulative plastic deformations (CPD), modulus of subgrade reaction (ks), resilient modulus (Mr) and rut depth reduction (RDR) for different number of cycles and plate settlements. The configuration of the geocell that provides highest performance in terms of TBR, CPD, and RDR, is considered to be the optimum size of the geocell. It is observed that the optimum geometry of the geocell is capable of reducing the rut depth of about 75 % at 100 cycles and provide about a TBR of 23 at 10 % of settlement ratio.

[1]  Ernest J. Barenberg,et al.  DESIGN AND BEHAVIOR OF SOIL-FABRIC-AGGREGATE SYSTEMS , 1978 .

[2]  Xiaoming Yang,et al.  Behavior of Geocell-Reinforced Sand under a Vertical Load , 2008 .

[3]  Ralph Haas,et al.  GEOGRID REINFORCEMENT OF GRANULAR BASES IN FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS , 1988 .

[4]  Sireesh Saride,et al.  Numerical modelling of strip footing on geocell-reinforced beds , 2015 .

[5]  Walter R Barker Open-Graded Bases for Airfield Pavements. , 1987 .

[6]  R. D. Barksdale,et al.  Potential benefits of geosynthetics in flexible pavement systems , 1989 .

[7]  J. G. Collin,et al.  Full Scale Highway Load Test of Flexible Pavement Systems with Geogrid Reinforced Base Courses , 1996 .

[8]  F Montanelli,et al.  IN-GROUND TEST FOR GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED FLEXIBLE PAVED ROADS , 1999 .

[9]  Sujit Kumar Dash,et al.  Bearing capacity of strip footings supported on geocell-reinforced sand , 2001 .

[10]  Xuejun Wen,et al.  Model studies on geogrid- or geocell-reinforced sand cushion on soft soil , 2008 .

[11]  Imad L. Al-Qadi,et al.  LABORATORY EVALUATION OF GEOSYNTHETIC-REINFORCED PAVEMENT SECTIONS , 1994 .

[12]  Dante Fratta,et al.  Development of testing methods to determine interaction of geogrid-reinforced granular material for mechanistic pavement analysis , 2009 .

[13]  B. M. Das,et al.  Bearing capacity of strip foundation on geogrid-reinforced sand , 2002 .

[14]  Sireesh Saride,et al.  Repeated Load Tests on Geocell Reinforced Sand Subgrades , 2013 .

[15]  Sanat Kumar Pokharel,et al.  Experimental Study on Geocell-Reinforced Bases under Static and Dynamic Loading , 2010 .

[16]  J. Giroud,et al.  Geotextile-Reinforced Unpaved Road Design , 1981 .

[17]  Arun Prasad,et al.  Effect of Geogrid Reinforcement Location in Paved Road Improvement , 2009 .

[18]  S. N. Moghaddas Tafreshi,et al.  A comparison of static and cyclic loading responses of foundations on geocell-reinforced sand , 2012 .

[19]  Sujit Kumar Dash,et al.  Model studies on circular footing supported on geocell reinforced sand underlain by soft clay , 2003 .

[20]  A S Vesic,et al.  BEARING CAPACITY THEORY FROM EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS , 1972 .