Evaluation of a Lymph Node Proliferation Assay for its Ability to Detect Pharmaceuticals with Potential to Cause Immune-Mediated Drug Reactions

Hypersensitivity reactions to systemically administered drugs cannot be predicted using available preclinical models. This research is a collaborative project to evaluate the ability of the Lymph Node Proliferation Assay (LNPA) to predict systemic hypersensitivity caused by pharmaceuticals. The assay design is a modification of the Local Lymph Node Assay with the major modification being injection of the test substance subcutaneously to achieve a known systemic exposure to the drug. Fourteen compounds were evaluated in the LNPA. These were two clinically negative drugs (Metformin, phenobarbital), an assay positive control (streptozotocin), eight human hypersensitivity positive drugs (sulfamethoxazole, procainamide, clonidine, ofloxacin, nevirapine, abacavir, lamotrigine, zomepirac), and 3 investigational drugs (CM40874, CM40954 and CM40420), one of which caused hypersensitivity in primates. Hypersensitivity-positive drugs were classified as such based on at least two of three independent data sources: U.S. FDA postmarketing database, drug labeling information, and clinical trial data. All drugs were tested in multiple laboratories for a total of 2–12 evaluations per compound. The pure drug substance was used for testing if it could be obtained commercially, otherwise the marketed drug formulation was used. Neither of the negative control drugs showed a positive reaction in the test system. Four of the eight hypersensitivity positive drugs showed a mixed or positive reaction. Two of the three investigational compounds gave a positive response. A smaller number of LNPAs were run concurrently using footpad injection and evaluation of the popliteal lymph node and gave generally comparable results. Additional development may increase the reproducibility of the assay and facilitate detection of drugs that require metabolic activation to become allergenic, or drugs for which there is dose-limiting toxicity. The data suggest that this method might be useful as a first-line screen to identify candidate drugs that are more likely to cause a high prevalence of human drug hypersensitivity.

[1]  W S Stokes,et al.  ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Conclusions and recommendations of an independent scientific peer review panel. , 2001, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[2]  J Hilton,et al.  Further evaluation of the local lymph node assay in the final phase of an international collaborative trial. , 1996, Toxicology.

[3]  C. Speirs Comparison of the Safety of Several Nonsteroidal Anti‐inflammatory Drugs Currently or Formerly Marketed in the United Kingdom , 1988, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[4]  R J Fielder,et al.  Local lymph node assay - validation, conduct and use in practice. , 2002, Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association.

[5]  R. Pieters,et al.  The use of reporter antigens in the popliteal lymph node assay to assess immunomodulation by chemicals. , 1997, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[6]  G. Klecak The Freund's Complete Adjuvant Test and the Open Epicutaneous Test. A complementary test procedure for realistic assessment of allergenic potential. , 1985, Current problems in dermatology.

[7]  R. Pieters,et al.  Evaluation of the use of reporter antigens in an auricular lymph node assay to assess the immunosensitizing potential of drugs. , 2004, Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology.

[8]  J. Weaver,et al.  Detection of systemic hypersensitivity to drugs using standard guinea pig assays. , 2003, Toxicology.

[9]  P Smith,et al.  Concordance of the toxicity of pharmaceuticals in humans and in animals. , 2000, Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP.

[10]  B. Gutting,et al.  Investigating the TNP‐OVA and direct popliteal lymph node assays for the detection of immunostimulation by drugs associated with anaphylaxis in humans , 2002, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[11]  J. Revillard,et al.  Activation of CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocyte subsets by streptozotocin in murine popliteal lymph node (PLN) test. , 1992, Journal of autoimmunity.

[12]  J. DiMasi,et al.  Risks in new drug development: Approval success rates for investigational drugs , 2001, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[13]  K. Corre,et al.  Adverse drug reaction processing in the United States and its dependence on physician reporting: zomepirac (Zomax) as a case in point. , 1988, Annals of emergency medicine.

[14]  H. Shionoya,et al.  Popliteal lymph node enlargement induced by procainamide. , 1992, International journal of immunopharmacology.

[15]  G. Klecak,et al.  Screening of fragrance materials for allergenicity in the guinea pig I. Comparison of four testing methods , 1977 .

[16]  C. Patriarca,et al.  Popliteal lymph node response to procainamide and isoniazid. Role of beta-naphthoflavone, phenobarbitone and S9-mix pretreatment. , 1993, Toxicology letters.

[17]  G. Choquet-Kastylevsky,et al.  Increased production of interferon‐gamma, but not IL‐4 mRNA, by streptozotocin in the popliteal lymph node assay , 2000, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[18]  G. Choquet-Kastylevsky,et al.  Induction of delayed-type hypersensitivity to sulfamethoxazole in mice: role of metabolites. , 2001, Toxicology letters.

[19]  W. Pichler,et al.  The immunological and clinical spectrum of delayed drug-induced exanthems , 2004, Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology.

[20]  J. D. de Bakker,et al.  The popliteal lymph node assay in mice to screen for the immune disregulating potential of chemicals--a preliminary study. , 1989, International journal of immunopharmacology.

[21]  H. Ely Drug eruption reference manual , 1995 .

[22]  C. Goebel,et al.  T lymphocytes ignore procainamide, but respond to its reactive metabolites in peritoneal cells: demonstration by the adoptive transfer popliteal lymph node assay. , 1993, Toxicology and applied pharmacology.

[23]  B. Strom,et al.  The effect of indication on hypersensitivity reactions associated with zomepirac sodium and other nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. , 1987, Arthritis and rheumatism.