Can we do without routine fenestration in extracardiac total cavopulmonary connections? Report on 84 consecutive patients

Fenestration is still widely used in right heart bypass operations. Our study was conducted to assess its need in the most recent modification, the completion of a total cavopulmonary connection with an extracardiac tube. The extracardiac approach was introduced at our institution in January, 1999. Since June of 2000, no patient had a fenestration. If more than 1 risk factor amongst ventricular function being more than moderately impaired, atrioventricular valvar regurgitation more than moderate, mean pulmonary arterial pressure more than 15 millimetres of mercury, mean atrial pressure higher than 12 millimetres of mercury, pulmonary arterial distortion, or other than sinus rhythm was present preoperatively, the patient was considered a “high risk” candidate. Postoperatively elevated pulmonary arterial pressure higher than 16 millimetres of mercury, prolonged effusions and requirement for drainage longer than 7 days, and death were considered endpoints in the statistical analysis. Our study group included 84 patients who underwent surgery up to August, 2004. A previous bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis had been accomplished in 73 patients at a mean age of 27.01 plus or minus 32.60 months, with a median of 11.5 months, without creating an additional source of flow of blood to the lungs. At the time of the total cavopulmonary connection, the mean age was 66.4 plus or minus 60.1 months, with a median of 37.1 months, and a range from 17.3 to 251.2 months, with 50 patients being younger than 48 months. We deemed 16 patients to be at “high risk”. These patients were older at the time of bidirectional cavopulmonary anstomosis (p smaller than 0.016), at the time of completion (p smaller than 0.019), and also differed in size at time of completion (p smaller than 0.020). They required a longer time on cardiopulmonary bypass (p smaller than 0.015), and reached higher early postoperative pulmonary arterial pressures after completion (p smaller than 0.025). There were no differences between groups of patients having up to 1 or more risk factors in regard to need for intubation (p smaller than 0.511), pulmonary arterial pressures after extubation (p smaller than 0.817), and duration of chest drainage (p smaller than 0.650). Three patients died, one in the group deemed at high risk. There was no death in the last 38 patients. We conclude that a total cavopulmonary connection with an extracardiac tube can be performed without fenestration, even if the patients are deemed to be at increased risk. Early staging of patients with functionally univentricular physiology might be one of the keys for these findings.

[1]  R. Hetzer,et al.  Mid-term follow-up after extracardiac Fontan operation. , 2004, The Thoracic and cardiovascular surgeon.

[2]  W. Wells,et al.  Risk factors for persistent pleural effusions after the extracardiac Fontan procedure. , 2004, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[3]  R. Lange,et al.  What was the impact of the introduction of extracardiac completion for a single center performing total cavopulmonary connections? , 2004, Cardiology in the Young.

[4]  J. Saul,et al.  Lateral tunnel versus extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure: a concurrent comparison. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[5]  S. Langley,et al.  The impact of ventricular morphology on midterm outcome following completion total cavopulmonary connection. , 2003, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[6]  S. Nicolson,et al.  Predictors of outcome after the Fontan operation: is hypoplastic left heart syndrome still a risk factor? , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  C. Ramaciotti,et al.  Fenestration Improves Clinical Outcome of the Fontan Procedure: A Prospective, Randomized Study , 2002, Circulation.

[8]  W. Williams,et al.  Extracardiac conduit versus lateral tunnel cavopulmonary connections at a single institution: impact on outcomes. , 2001, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  J. Tweddell,et al.  Factors Related to Pleural Effusions After Fontan Procedure in the Era of Fenestration , 2001, Circulation.

[10]  M. Turrentine,et al.  Evolution of the Fontan procedure in a single center. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  S. Choudhary,et al.  Univentricular repair: is routine fenestration justified? , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  S. Kitamura,et al.  Total cavopulmonary connection in children with body weight less than 10 kg. , 2000, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[13]  D. McElhinney,et al.  Is it necessary to routinely fenestrate an extracardiac fontan? , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  M. Leval,et al.  The Fontan Circulation: What Have We Learned? What to Expect? , 1998, Pediatric Cardiology.

[15]  A. Amodeo,et al.  Extracardiac Fontan operation for complex cardiac anomalies: seven years' experience. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  W. Gersony,et al.  Outcome after the single-stage, nonfenestrated Fontan procedure. , 1997, Circulation.

[17]  J Burnett,et al.  Fontan operation in five hundred consecutive patients: factors influencing early and late outcome. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[18]  S. Colan,et al.  Functional outcome after the Fontan operation: factors influencing late morbidity. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[19]  S. Nicolson,et al.  Modified ultrafiltration reduces postoperative morbidity after cavopulmonary connection. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[20]  D J Penny,et al.  Management of the univentricular connection: are we improving? , 1997, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[21]  D. Hagler,et al.  Improved early morbidity and mortality after Fontan operation: the Mayo Clinic experience, 1987 to 1992. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[22]  M. Crochet,et al.  Comparison by computerized numeric modeling of energy losses in different Fontan connections. , 1995, Circulation.

[23]  D. Rosenthal,et al.  Thromboembolic complications after Fontan operations. , 1995, Circulation.

[24]  J. Mayer,et al.  Cerebrovascular accidents following the Fontan operation. , 1995, Pediatric neurology.

[25]  M. Jahangiri,et al.  Thromboembolism after the Fontan procedure and its modifications. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[26]  M. Jacobs,et al.  Fontan operation: influence of modifications on morbidity and mortality. , 1994, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[27]  J. F. Keane,et al.  Effect of Baffle Fenestration on Outcome of the Modified Fontan Operation , 1992, Circulation.

[28]  C. Mavroudis,et al.  Fenestrated Fontan With Delayed Catheter Closure: Effects of Volume Loading and Baffle Fenestration on Cardiac Index and Oxygen Delivery , 1992, Circulation.

[29]  Z. Hijazi,et al.  Fenestrated Fontan operation with delayed transcatheter closure of atrial septal defect. Improved results in high-risk patients. , 1992, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[30]  J. Jarmakani,et al.  Partial Fontan: advantages of an adjustable interatrial communication. , 1991, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[31]  J. Lock,et al.  Baffle fenestration with subsequent transcatheter closure. Modification of the Fontan operation for patients at increased risk. , 1990, Circulation.

[32]  J. F. Keane,et al.  Bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis as interim palliation for high-risk Fontan candidates. Early results. , 1990, Circulation.

[33]  H. Laks,et al.  Definitive repair in patients with pulmonary atresia and intact ventricular septum. , 1989, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[34]  S. Ishikawa,et al.  Total cavopulmonary connection with an extracardiac conduit: experience with 100 patients. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[35]  M. D. de Leval The Fontan Circulation: What Have We Learned? What to Expect? , 1998, Pediatric cardiology.