American Society of Hematology living guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis for patients with COVID-19: March 2022 update on the use of anticoagulation in critically ill patients

Background: COVID-19 related critical illness is associated with an increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Objective: These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians, and other health care professionals in decisions about the use of anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19. Methods: ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel, including three patient representatives, and applied strategies to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including performing systematic evidence reviews (up to January 2022). The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The panel used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess evidence and make recommendations, which were subject to public comment. This is an update to guidelines published in February 2021 and May 2021 as part of the living phase of these guidelines. Results: The panel made one additional recommendation, a conditional recommendation for the use of prophylactic-intensity over therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19-related critical illness who do not have suspected or confirmed VTE. The panel emphasized the need for an individualized assessment of thrombotic and bleeding risk. Conclusions: This conditional recommendation was based on very low certainty in the evidence, underscoring the need for additional, high-quality, randomized controlled trials comparing different intensities of anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19-related critical illness.

[1]  P. Meybohm,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Intermediate- and Therapeutic-Dose Anticoagulation for Hospitalised Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2021, Journal of clinical medicine.

[2]  J. Halperin,et al.  Efficacy and Safety of Therapeutic-Dose Heparin vs Standard Prophylactic or Intermediate-Dose Heparins for Thromboprophylaxis in High-risk Hospitalized Patients With COVID-19: The HEP-COVID Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2021, JAMA internal medicine.

[3]  Christopher M. Horvat,et al.  Therapeutic Anticoagulation with Heparin in Critically Ill Patients with Covid-19 , 2021, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  H. Poor Pulmonary Thrombosis and Thromboembolism in COVID-19 , 2021, Chest.

[5]  A. Simonds,et al.  Management of hospitalised adults with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a European Respiratory Society living guideline , 2021, European Respiratory Journal.

[6]  H. Schünemann,et al.  American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19 , 2021, Blood Advances.

[7]  M. Egi,et al.  Japanese rapid/living recommendations on drug management for COVID‐19: updated guidelines (September 2021) , 2021, Acute medicine & surgery.

[8]  D. Jiménez,et al.  Incidence of VTE and Bleeding Among Hospitalized Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 , 2020, Chest.

[9]  S. Nopp,et al.  Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID‐19: A systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2020, Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

[10]  H. Schünemann,et al.  A user guide to the American Society of Hematology clinical practice guidelines. , 2020, Blood advances.

[11]  P. Chan,et al.  Secular trends and etiologies of venous thromboembolism in Chinese from 2004 to 2016. , 2018, Thrombosis research.

[12]  G. Guyatt,et al.  [GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 2: Clinical practice guidelines]. , 2018, Gaceta sanitaria.

[13]  H. Schünemann,et al.  [GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.] , 2017, Recenti progressi in medicina.

[14]  Alonso Carrasco-Labra,et al.  GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks for adoption, adaptation, and de novo development of trustworthy recommendations: GRADE-ADOLOPMENT. , 2017, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[15]  Holger J Schünemann,et al.  Guidelines International Network: Principles for Disclosure of Interests and Management of Conflicts in Guidelines. , 2015, Annals of internal medicine.

[16]  Günter Ollenschläger,et al.  Guidelines International Network: Toward International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  Gordon H Guyatt,et al.  GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[18]  S. Greenfield,et al.  Clinical practice guidelines we can trust , 2011 .

[19]  G. Guyatt,et al.  GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[20]  G. Guyatt,et al.  Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group , 2004, BMC health services research.

[21]  B. Cheuk,et al.  Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism in a Chinese population , 2004, The British journal of surgery.

[22]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Letters, numbers, symbols and words: how to communicate grades of evidence and recommendations. , 2003, CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne.

[23]  W Penfield,et al.  University Medicine. , 1962, Canadian Medical Association journal.