Hybrid experimental performance of a full‐scale two‐story buckling‐restrained braced RC frame

Summary This paper proposes a novel implementation of buckling-restrained braces (BRB) in new reinforced concrete (RC) frame construction. Seismic design and analysis methods for using a proposed steel cast-in anchor bracket (CAB) to transfer normal and shear forces between the BRB and RC members are investigated. A full-scale two-story RC frame with BRBs (BRB-RCF) is tested using hybrid and cyclic loading test procedures. The BRBs were arranged in a zigzag configuration and designed to resist 70% of the story shear. The gusset design incorporates the BRB axial and RCF actions, while the beam and column members comply with ACI 318-14 seismic design provisions. Test results confirm that the BRBs enhanced the RCF stiffness, strength, and ductility. The hysteresis energy dissipation ratios in the four hybrid tests range from 60% to 94% in the two stories, indicating that BRBs can effectively dissipate seismic input energy. When the inter-story drift ratio for both stories reached 3.5% in the cyclic loading test, the overall lateral force versus deformation response was still very stable. No failure of the proposed steel CABs and RC discontinuity regions was observed. This study demonstrates that the proposed design and construction methods for the CABs are effective and practical for real applications. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Kuan-Yu Pan,et al.  Seismic retrofit of reinforced concrete frames using buckling‐restrained braces with bearing block load transfer mechanism , 2016 .

[2]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Seismic design and hybrid tests of a full‐scale three‐story buckling‐restrained braced frame using welded end connections and thin profile , 2012 .

[3]  Mamoru Iwata,et al.  Studies on Integrated Building Facade Engineering with High-Performance Structural Elements , 2006 .

[4]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Object-oriented development and application of a nonlinear structural analysis framework , 2009, Adv. Eng. Softw..

[5]  Toru Takeuchi,et al.  Out‐of‐plane stability assessment of buckling‐restrained braces including connections with chevron configuration , 2016 .

[6]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Bidirectional substructure pseudo‐dynamic tests and analysis of a full‐scale two‐story buckling‐restrained braced frame , 2016 .

[7]  Shyh-Jiann Hwang,et al.  Strength Prediction for Discontinuity Regions by Softened Strut-and-Tie Model , 2002 .

[8]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Pseudo‐dynamic test of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame—Part II: Seismic performance of buckling‐restrained braces and connections , 2008 .

[9]  Shoichi Kishiki,et al.  Subassemblage cyclic loading test of RC frame with buckling restrained braces in zigzag configuration , 2013 .

[10]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Pseudo‐dynamic tests of a full‐scale CFT/BRB frame—Part I: Specimen design, experiment and analysis , 2008 .

[11]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Welded end‐slot connection and debonding layers for buckling‐restrained braces , 2014 .

[12]  Mahmoud R. Maheri,et al.  Connection overstrength in steel-braced RC frames , 2008 .

[13]  Keh-Chyuan Tsai,et al.  Retrofit of reinforced concrete frames with buckling‐restrained braces , 2015 .

[14]  Ming-Chieh Chuang,et al.  Critical limit states in seismic buckling‐restrained brace and connection designs , 2015 .

[15]  Ryota Matsui,et al.  Seismic retrofit design method for RC buildings using buckling-restrained braces and steel frames , 2014 .

[16]  Moncef L. Nehdi,et al.  Seismic performance of RC frames with concentric internal steel bracing , 2007 .

[17]  Ryota Matsui,et al.  Out‐of‐plane stability of buckling‐restrained braces including moment transfer capacity , 2014 .