This sludy investigates cthnobotanical knowledge variation in Little Dixie, a folk cultural rcgion in Central Missouri. Data wcrc obtained from twenty "experts" and twenty "novices" who fre~-listed Ihe names and uses for wild plants and rated Ihem according to cultural usefulness, ecological value, beauty, and overall appeal. 11 is hypolhesized and demonstrated that novices privilcge species that an> perceptually distinctive and ecologically abundant, while cxperts emphasize specil:.'5 with high usc potential. Accordingly, novices emphasize beau ty, a form-b<lsed variable, in their evaluation of listed species, while experts em phasize cultural utility, a function-based variable. These results suggest thai the acquisition of ethnobotanical expertise entails a shift from morphological, imag istic information processing to the cognitive assimilation of abstracl, utilitarian factors gained through learning and cultural experience.
[1]
Justin M. Nolan,et al.
A Measure of Dichotomous Category Bias in Free Listing Tasks'
,
1997
.
[2]
Paul Hekkert,et al.
Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders : A study in the appraisal of art
,
1996
.
[3]
G. Martin.
Ethnobotany: A Methods Manual
,
1995
.
[4]
R. Hurt.
Agriculture and Slavery in Missouri's Little Dixie
,
1992
.
[5]
Andy Feig.
Monarda didyma L.
,
1998
.
[6]
Gregg E.A. Solomon,et al.
Conceptual Change and Wine Expertise
,
1997
.
[7]
Gordon C. Tucker.
Typha latifolia L.
,
1997
.
[8]
Ken Konsis.
Salix alba L.
,
1981
.