Some Comments on the Entropy-Based Criteria for Piping

This paper is an extension of previous work which characterises soil behaviours using the grading entropy diagram. The present work looks at the piping process in granular soils, by considering some new data from flood-protection dikes. The piping process is divided into three parts here: particle movement at the micro scale to segregate free water; sand boil development (which is the initiation of the pipe), and pipe growth. In the first part of the process, which occurs during the rising flood, the increase in shear stress along the dike base may cause segregation of water into micro pipes if the subsoil in the dike base is relatively loose. This occurs at the maximum dike base shear stress level (ratio of shear stress and strength) zone which is close to the toe. In the second part of the process, the shear strain increment causes a sudden, asymmetric slide and cracking of the dike leading to the localized excess pore pressure, liquefaction and the formation of a sand boil. In the third part of the process, the soil erosion initiated through the sand boil continues, and the pipe grows. The piping in the Hungarian dikes often occurs in a two-layer system; where the base layer is coarser with higher permeability and the cover layer is finer with lower permeability. The new data presented here show that the soils ejected from the sand boils are generally silty sands and sands, which are prone to both erosion (on the basis of the entropy criterion) and liquefaction. They originate from the cover layer which is basically identical to the soil used in the Dutch backward erosion experiments.

[1]  V. Parmon,et al.  Entropy and Information , 2009 .

[2]  Antonio Gens,et al.  Aznalcóllar dam failure. Part 3: Dynamics of the motion , 2006 .

[3]  I. Towhata Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering , 2008 .

[4]  Hans Sellmeijer,et al.  Fine-tuning of the backward erosion piping model through small-scale, medium-scale and IJkdijk experiments , 2011 .

[5]  Hans Sellmeijer,et al.  Observations on the process of backward erosion piping in small-, medium- and full-scale experiments , 2011 .

[6]  Kálmán Rajkai,et al.  Grading entropy variation due to soil crushing , 2005 .

[7]  Jana Fuhrmann How The Earth Works , 2016 .

[8]  Phong Q. Trang,et al.  The Grading Entropy-based Criteria for Structural Stability of Granular Materials and Filters , 2015, Entropy.

[9]  Steven L. Kramer,et al.  Initiation of Soil Liquefaction Under Static Loading Conditions , 1988 .

[10]  S Thorburn,et al.  LATERAL DISPLACEMENTS OF LOW EMBANKMENTS ON ALLUVIUM CONTAINING THIN PEAT LAYERS , 1981 .

[11]  P. Ván,et al.  Thermodynamic aspects of rock friction , 2013, Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica.

[12]  Shahid Azam,et al.  Oil sand tailings characterisation for centrifuge dewatering , 2014 .

[13]  Eduardo Alonso,et al.  Progressive failure of Aznalcóllar dam using the material point method , 2011 .

[14]  I. Jefferson,et al.  Soil mechanics in engineering practice , 1997 .

[15]  George Y. Baladi,et al.  Stress Distribution within and under Long Elastic Embankments: Research Paper , 1967 .

[16]  Ulrich Smoltczyk,et al.  Geotechnical engineering handbook , 2002 .

[17]  Stéphane Bonelli,et al.  Erosion in geomechanics applied to dams and levees , 2013 .

[18]  Antonio Gens,et al.  Aznalcóllar dam failure. Part 2: Stability conditions and failure mechanism , 2006 .

[19]  Tom Schanz,et al.  A general dry density law for sands , 2009 .

[20]  A. Gens,et al.  Aznalcóllar dam failure. Part 1: Field observations and material properties , 2006 .

[21]  H. Brandl,et al.  Geosynthetics applications for the mitigation of natural disasters and for environmental protection , 2011 .

[22]  S. Mori,et al.  LIMITS IN THE GRADATION CURVES OF LIQUEFIABLE SOILS , 2002 .

[23]  U. Schuler,et al.  Filters in Geotechnical and Hydraulic Engineering , 1993 .

[24]  Phong Q. Trang,et al.  Case Studies and Benchmark Examples for the Use of Grading Entropy in Geotechnics , 2012, Entropy.