A Tunable Real-world Multi-funnel Benchmark Problem for Evolutionary Optimization - And Why Parallel Island Models Might Remedy the Failure of CMA-ES on It

A common shortcoming in the Evolutionary Computation (EC) community is that the publication of many search heuristics is not accompanied by rigorous benchmarks on a balanced set of test problems. A welcome effort to promote such test suites are the IEEE CEC competitions on real-valued black-box optimization. These competitions prescribe carefully designed synthetic test functions and benchmarking protocols. They do, however, not contain tunable real-world examples of the important class of multi-funnel functions. We argue that finding minimum-energy configurations of 38-atom Lennard-Jones (LJ38) clusters could serve as such a benchmark for real-valued, single-objective evolutionary optimization. We thus suggest that this problem be included in EC studies whenever general-purpose optimizers are proposed. The problem is tunable from a single-funnel to a double-funnel topology. We show that the winner of the CEC 2005 competition, the Evolution Strategy with Covariance Matrix Adaptation (CMA-ES), works on the single-funnel version of this test case, but fails on the double-funnel version. We further argue that this performance loss of CMA-ES can be relaxed by using parallel island models. We support this hypothesis by simulation results of a parallel island CMA-ES, the Particle Swarm CMA-ES, on a subset of the multi-funnel functions in the CEC 2005

[1]  Andrew M. Sutton,et al.  PSO and multi-funnel landscapes: how cooperation might limit exploration , 2006, GECCO.

[2]  Patricia L Clark,et al.  Protein folding in the cell: reshaping the folding funnel. , 2004, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[3]  Andrew M. Sutton,et al.  The Impact of Global Structure on Search , 2008, PPSN.

[4]  Christian L. Müller,et al.  Particle Swarm CMA Evolution Strategy for the optimization of multi-funnel landscapes , 2009, 2009 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[5]  Jing J. Liang,et al.  Problem Definitions and Evaluation Criteria for the CEC 2005 Special Session on Real-Parameter Optimization , 2005 .

[6]  J. Doye,et al.  Global Optimization by Basin-Hopping and the Lowest Energy Structures of Lennard-Jones Clusters Containing up to 110 Atoms , 1997, cond-mat/9803344.

[7]  R. Podgornik Energy Landscapes: Applications to Clusters, Biomolecules and Glasses (Cambridge Molecular Science) , 2007 .

[8]  Enrique Alba,et al.  Parallel Metaheuristics: A New Class of Algorithms , 2005 .

[9]  J. Doye,et al.  THE DOUBLE-FUNNEL ENERGY LANDSCAPE OF THE 38-ATOM LENNARD-JONES CLUSTER , 1998, cond-mat/9808265.

[10]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size , 2005, 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation.

[11]  Doye Effect of compression on the global optimization of atomic clusters , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[12]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Completely Derandomized Self-Adaptation in Evolution Strategies , 2001, Evolutionary Computation.

[13]  P. Steinhardt,et al.  Bond-orientational order in liquids and glasses , 1983 .

[14]  Nikolaus Hansen,et al.  Evaluating the CMA Evolution Strategy on Multimodal Test Functions , 2004, PPSN.