Understanding the Role of Technology in Asian Economies: The Environmental Impact of Remittances and Economic Complexity.

In recent years, scholars have determined various determinants of environmental degradation using the panel and time-series studies. However, technological innovations (TI) and remittances, among the financial system's essential components, are relatively ignored. In addition, nations' economic progress and environmental performance also depend upon the nature of their economic structure. This empirical research investigates the effects of TI, remittances and economic complexity (EC) on CO2 controlling economic growth and trade openness (TR) in the selected 15 Asian nations. The study collected panel data of 15 Asian countries from 1990 to 2019 and employed the panel quantile regression and augmented mean group methods to unveil the impacts of variables on CO2 emissions. The empirical findings established that remittances are negatively linked with CO2 emissions. Similarly, EC reduces CO2 emissions in the context of Asian countries. In addition, EC and remittances Granger cause CO2 emissions. These findings indicate that remittances and EC positively contribute to environmental quality in Asian countries. Conversely, TI, economic growth, and TR intensify CO2 emissions in Asian countries. Finally, the study recommended policies to enhance remittances and EC in Asian countries to curb environmental degradation.

[1]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  Impact of governance and globalization on natural resources volatility: The role of financial development in the Middle East North Africa countries , 2022, Resources Policy.

[2]  Irfan Khan,et al.  Abundance of natural resources and environmental sustainability: the roles of manufacturing value-added, urbanization, and permanent cropland , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[3]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  Environmental impact of information and communication technology: Unveiling the role of education in developing countries , 2022, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[4]  Hafiz Muhammad Arslan,et al.  Understanding the dynamics of natural resources rents, environmental sustainability, and sustainable economic growth: new insights from China , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[5]  V. Tawiah,et al.  Are abundant energy resources and Chinese business a solution to environmental prosperity in Africa? , 2022, Energy Policy.

[6]  A. Zakari,et al.  A study of trilemma energy balance, clean energy transitions, and economic expansion in the midst of environmental sustainability: New insights from three trilemma leadership , 2022, Energy.

[7]  Sanjeet Singh,et al.  World energy trilemma and transformative energy developments as determinants of economic growth amid environmental sustainability , 2022, Energy Economics.

[8]  Bangzhu Zhu,et al.  Environmental complexity of globalization, education, and income inequalities: New insights of energy poverty , 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[9]  S. Hassan,et al.  Role of alternative and nuclear energy in stimulating environmental sustainability: impact of government expenditures , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[10]  V. Tawiah,et al.  Reviewing the ecological footprints of Africa top carbon consumer: a quantile on quantile analysis , 2022, International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology.

[11]  I. Khan,et al.  Alternate energy sources and environmental quality: The impact of inflation dynamics , 2022, Gondwana Research.

[12]  V. Tawiah,et al.  The production and consumption of oil in Africa: The environmental implications , 2022, Resources Policy.

[13]  Irfan Khan,et al.  The Introduction of Green Finance: A Curse or a Benefit to Environmental Sustainability? , 2021, Energy RESEARCH LETTERS.

[14]  Irfan Khan,et al.  Clean energy investment and financial development as determinants of environment and sustainable economic growth: evidence from China , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[15]  Irfan Khan,et al.  A study of energy investment and environmental sustainability nexus in China: a bootstrap replications analysis , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[16]  Irfan Khan,et al.  Dynamics among economic growth, urbanization, and environmental sustainability in IEA countries: the role of industry value-added , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[17]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Is there a tradeoff between financial globalization, economic growth, and environmental sustainability? An advanced panel analysis , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[18]  Husam Rjoub,et al.  Linking Innovative Human Capital, Economic Growth, and CO2 Emissions: An Empirical Study Based on Chinese Provincial Panel Data , 2021, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[19]  Muntasir Murshed,et al.  Reinvigorating the role of clean energy transition for achieving a low-carbon economy: evidence from Bangladesh , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[20]  Abdulai Abdul Majeed,et al.  An environmental impact assessment of economic complexity and energy consumption: Does institutional quality make a difference? , 2021, Environmental Impact Assessment Review.

[21]  T. Adebayo,et al.  Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation? , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[22]  Hafiz Waqas Kamran,et al.  Role of green technology innovation and renewable energy in carbon neutrality: A sustainable investigation from Turkey. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[23]  Q. Zaman,et al.  Impact of remittances on carbon emission: fresh evidence from a panel of five remittance-receiving countries , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[24]  Songsheng Chen,et al.  The effects of research and development and financial development on CO2 emissions: evidence from selected WAME economies , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[25]  S. H. Hashmi,et al.  Non-linear relationship between urbanization paths and CO2 emissions: A case of South, South-East and East Asian economies , 2021 .

[26]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  Effects of biomass energy consumption on environmental quality: The role of education and technology in Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation countries , 2021 .

[27]  Bin Zhang,et al.  Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL , 2021 .

[28]  Irfan Khan,et al.  Does multilateral environmental diplomacy improve environmental quality? The case of the United States , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[29]  Michael Cary,et al.  Accounting asymmetries in the long-run nexus between globalization and environmental sustainability in the United States: An aggregated and disaggregated investigation , 2021 .

[30]  Irfan Khan,et al.  The environmental footprint of China-Africa engagement: An analysis of the effect of China - Africa partnership on carbon emissions. , 2020, The Science of the total environment.

[31]  Zahoor Ahmed,et al.  Linking Information Communication Technology, trade globalization index, and CO2 emissions: evidence from advanced panel techniques , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[32]  Muhammad Nasir Malik,et al.  Foreign direct investment and education as determinants of environmental quality: The importance of post Paris Agreement (COP21). , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[33]  Buhari Doğan,et al.  The mitigating effects of economic complexity and renewable energy on carbon emissions in developed countries , 2020 .

[34]  U. Pata Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic complexity, CO2 emissions, and ecological footprint in the USA: testing the EKC hypothesis with a structural break , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[35]  Chien‐Chiang Lee,et al.  Does technological innovation reduce CO2 emissions?Cross-country evidence , 2020 .

[36]  Anis Omri,et al.  Foreign investment and air pollution: Do good governance and technological innovation matter? , 2020, Environmental research.

[37]  Anwar Khan,et al.  On the remittances-environment led hypothesis: Empirical evidence from BRICS economies , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[38]  I. Ozturk,et al.  The financial development-environmental degradation nexus in the United Arab Emirates: the importance of growth, globalization and structural breaks , 2020, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[39]  P. Mealy,et al.  Economic Complexity and the Green Economy , 2017, Research Policy.

[40]  Ida A. Mirzaie,et al.  Macroeconomic policies and the Iranian economy in the era of sanctions , 2021 .

[41]  Mikhail Zymbler,et al.  Internet of Things is a revolutionary approach for future technology enhancement: a review , 2019, Journal of Big Data.

[42]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  The nexus between urbanization, road infrastructure, and transport energy demand: empirical evidence from Pakistan , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[43]  J. Inekwe,et al.  Human capital and energy consumption: Evidence from OECD countries , 2019, Energy Economics.

[44]  Muhammad Wasif Zafar,et al.  The impact of natural resources, human capital, and foreign direct investment on the ecological footprint: The case of the United States , 2019, Resources Policy.

[45]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  Investigating the impact of human capital on the ecological footprint in India: An empirical analysis , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[46]  F. A. Sobhani,et al.  Corporate Social Responsibility in Healthcare: A case of Islamic Banks (IBs) in Bangladesh , 2019, Bangladesh Journal of Medical Science.

[47]  Zhaohua Wang,et al.  Does globalization increase the ecological footprint? Empirical evidence from Malaysia , 2019, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[48]  F. Ganda The impact of innovation and technology investments on carbon emissions in selected organisation for economic Co-operation and development countries , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[49]  Pallavi,et al.  Gridded Emissions of CO, NO x, SO2, CO2, NH3, HCl, CH4, PM2.5, PM10, BC, and NMVOC from Open Municipal Waste Burning in India. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[50]  Olimpia Neagu,et al.  The Relationship between Economic Complexity, Energy Consumption Structure and Greenhouse Gas Emission: Heterogeneous Panel Evidence from the EU Countries , 2019, Sustainability.

[51]  Justice Mensah Sustainable development: Meaning, history, principles, pillars, and implications for human action: Literature review , 2019, Cogent Social Sciences.

[52]  Obaid ur Rehman,et al.  Testing EKC hypothesis with energy and sustainable development challenges: a fresh evidence from belt and road initiative economies , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[53]  Recep Ulucak,et al.  A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[54]  Yingyuan Guo,et al.  Environmental Regulation, Government R&D Funding and Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from China Provincial Data , 2018 .

[55]  S. Tsai,et al.  An Empirical Study on Green Innovation Efficiency in the Green Institutional Environment , 2018 .

[56]  Bo Wang,et al.  Imported technology and CO2 emission in China: Collecting evidence through bound testing and VECM approach , 2018 .

[57]  B. B. Khatri Utilization of Remittance at Household Level: A Case of Khanigaun Village of Resunga Municipality, Gulmi District , 2017 .

[58]  Nahla Samargandi Sector value addition, technology and CO2 emissions in Saudi Arabia ☆ , 2017 .

[59]  Agustín Álvarez-Herranz,et al.  Energy innovation and renewable energy consumption in the correction of air pollution levels , 2017 .

[60]  Giray Gozgor,et al.  The impact of economic complexity on carbon emissions: evidence from France , 2017, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[61]  Dietmar Meyer,et al.  The impact of remittances on economic growth: An econometric model , 2017 .

[62]  Victor Moutinho,et al.  CO2 emissions, non-renewable and renewable electricity production, economic growth, and international trade in Italy , 2016 .

[63]  N. Apergis Environmental Kuznets curves: New evidence on both panel and country-level CO2 emissions , 2016 .

[64]  Ki‐Hoon Lee,et al.  Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance , 2015 .

[65]  Ilhan Ozturk,et al.  Causal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia , 2015, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[66]  Jianhua Yin,et al.  The effects of environmental regulation and technical progress on CO2 Kuznets curve: An evidence from China , 2015 .

[67]  A. Mohammed,et al.  Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis by utilizing the ecological footprint as an indicator of environmental degradation , 2015 .

[68]  Kim Sass Mikkelsen,et al.  In murky waters: a disentangling of corruption and related concepts , 2013, Crime, Law and Social Change.

[69]  C. Tang,et al.  The dynamic links between CO2 emissions, economic growth and coal consumption in China and India , 2013 .

[70]  Reetu Verma,et al.  CO2 emissions, energy consumption, trade and income: A comparative analysis of China and India , 2012 .

[71]  N. Manzoor,et al.  Ocimum sanctum essential oil and its active principles exert their antifungal activity by disrupting ergosterol biosynthesis and membrane integrity. , 2010, Research in microbiology.

[72]  Masaaki Kijima,et al.  Economic models for the environmental Kuznets curve: A survey , 2010 .

[73]  S. Managi,et al.  Decomposition of the environmental Kuznets curve: scale, technique, and composition effects , 2010 .

[74]  César A. Hidalgo,et al.  The building blocks of economic complexity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[75]  Ferda Halicioğlu,et al.  An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey , 2009 .

[76]  K. Upadhyaya,et al.  Remittances and economic growth in developing countries , 2008 .

[77]  H. Herring,et al.  Technological innovation, energy efficient design and the rebound effect , 2007 .

[78]  Takeshi Kawase,et al.  Ball-, bowl-, and belt-shaped conjugated systems and their complexing abilities: exploration of the concave-convex pi-pi interaction. , 2006, Chemical reviews.

[79]  Sangbum Shin Economic Globalization and the Environment in China: A Comparative Case Study of Shenyang and Dalian , 2004 .

[80]  R. Hill,et al.  An Exploration of the Conceptual and Empirical Basis of the Environmental Kuznets Curve , 2002 .

[81]  D. Wield,et al.  Regulation as a means for the social control of technology , 1994 .