Deep Residual Learning for Compressed Sensing CT Reconstruction via Persistent Homology Analysis

Recently, compressed sensing (CS) computed tomography (CT) using sparse projection views has been extensively investigated to reduce the potential risk of radiation to patient. However, due to the insufficient number of projection views, an analytic reconstruction approach results in severe streaking artifacts and CS-based iterative approach is computationally very expensive. To address this issue, here we propose a novel deep residual learning approach for sparse view CT reconstruction. Specifically, based on a novel persistent homology analysis showing that the manifold of streaking artifacts is topologically simpler than original ones, a deep residual learning architecture that estimates the streaking artifacts is developed. Once a streaking artifact image is estimated, an artifact-free image can be obtained by subtracting the streaking artifacts from the input image. Using extensive experiments with real patient data set, we confirm that the proposed residual learning provides significantly better image reconstruction performance with several orders of magnitude faster computational speed.

[1]  Lei Zhang,et al.  Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoising , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[2]  E. Sidky,et al.  Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  David L Donoho,et al.  Compressed sensing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[4]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[5]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Real-Time Single Image and Video Super-Resolution Using an Efficient Sub-Pixel Convolutional Neural Network , 2016, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[6]  Jong Chul Ye,et al.  A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low‐dose X‐ray CT reconstruction , 2016, Medical physics.

[7]  Surya Ganguli,et al.  Exponential expressivity in deep neural networks through transient chaos , 2016, NIPS.

[8]  Peter L. Bartlett,et al.  Rademacher and Gaussian Complexities: Risk Bounds and Structural Results , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[9]  Enhong Chen,et al.  Image Denoising and Inpainting with Deep Neural Networks , 2012, NIPS.

[10]  Sergey Ioffe,et al.  Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shift , 2015, ICML.

[11]  Andrea Vedaldi,et al.  MatConvNet: Convolutional Neural Networks for MATLAB , 2014, ACM Multimedia.

[12]  Peter L. Bartlett,et al.  Neural Network Learning - Theoretical Foundations , 1999 .

[13]  한보형,et al.  Learning Deconvolution Network for Semantic Segmentation , 2015 .

[14]  Wei Yu,et al.  On learning optimized reaction diffusion processes for effective image restoration , 2015, 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[15]  Yu-Bin Yang,et al.  Image Denoising Using Very Deep Fully Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Networks with Symmetric Skip Connections , 2016, ArXiv.

[16]  Matus Telgarsky,et al.  Benefits of Depth in Neural Networks , 2016, COLT.

[17]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[18]  Franco Scarselli,et al.  On the Complexity of Neural Network Classifiers: A Comparison Between Shallow and Deep Architectures , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems.

[19]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks , 2012, Commun. ACM.

[20]  Kyoung Mu Lee,et al.  Accurate Image Super-Resolution Using Very Deep Convolutional Networks , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).