The objective of this research was to experimentally and analytically investigate the behavior of existing rehabilitated floor and roof wood diaphragms under in-plane lateral loads. The study focused on wood diaphragms characteristic of pre-1950’s unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings found in the central and eastern regions of the United States. Three diaphragm experimental specimens were built, tested, retrofitted and retested again under quasi-static reversed cyclic loading. The specimens differed in the type of sheathing, nailing pattern and the framing orientation with respect to the loading. One specimen represented a floor diaphragm, while the other two were more typical roof diaphragms, with one having a corner opening. A total of four retrofit methods were used on the specimens: (1) steel perimeter strapping and enhanced bolted connections; (2) a steel truss with enhanced bolted connections; (3) an unblocked plywood overlay and (4) a blocked plywood overlay. The in-plane lateral responses measured for the diaphragms were used to develop backbone curves, which were compared with those given in the FEMA 273 and FEMA 356 guidelines for seismic rehabilitation and some differences were found. An analytical study of the diaphragm specimens was undertaken using twodimensional finite element models. Inelastic quasi-static analyses were used to calibrate nailed connection slip behavior, which involves selecting hysteretic parameters for strength deterioration, stiffness degradation and pinching, to correlate with the experimentally measured diaphragm behavior under lateral loads. The analysis was extended to predict the lateral in-plane response for unretrofitted and retrofitted diaphragms of varying aspect ratios.
[1]
David Jones,et al.
Shaky ground
,
1990,
Nature.
[2]
Jr Stillinger.
Lateral Tests on Full-Scale Lumber- and Plywood-Sheathed Roof Diaphragms
,
1955
.
[3]
Greg Foliente,et al.
Hysteresis Modeling of Wood Joints and Structural Systems
,
1995
.
[4]
Vitelmo V. Bertero,et al.
An Evaluation of Inelastic Seismic Design Spectra
,
1981
.
[5]
Edward W. Kuenzi,et al.
Theoretical design of a nailed or bolted joint under lateral load
,
1960
.
[6]
Jocelyn Paquette,et al.
Pseudo-Dynamic Testing of Unreinforced Masonry Building with Flexible Diaphragm
,
2003
.
[7]
Thomas Lee Wilkinson.
Theoretical Lateral Resistance of Nailed Joints
,
1971
.
[8]
Amber Jo Grubbs.
Seismic rehabilitation of wood diaphragms in unreinforced masonary buildings
,
2002
.
[9]
Donald E. Breyer.
Design of wood structures
,
1980
.
[10]
Y. J. Park,et al.
IDARC: Inelastic Damage Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame - Shear-Wall Structures
,
1987
.
[11]
Thomas Lee Wilkinson.
Analysis of Nailed Joints with Dissimilar Members
,
1972
.
[12]
Michel Bruneau,et al.
State-of-the-art report on seismic performance of unreinforced masonry buildings
,
1995
.
[13]
Lawrence A. Soltis,et al.
Lateral and Withdrawal Strength of Nail Connections for Manufactured Housing
,
1994
.
[14]
Muthukrishnan Sathyamoorthy,et al.
Nonlinear analysis of structures
,
1997
.
[15]
M. Daniel Vanderbilt,et al.
Generalized Model for Lateral Load Slip of Nailed Joints
,
1991
.