The emotional bond: vision and organizational commitment among high‐tech employees

The new transformational leadership theories stress the emotional bond between leaders and followers, as opposed to the cognitive‐calculative exchange emphasized by traditional transactional theories. However, very little empirical research has concentrated on the effects of transformational leaders on emotion‐ versus cognition‐focused aspects of their followers' world. This study tested the relationships of vision, a common theme to all of the prominent new leadership theories, to the emotion‐focused affective commitment (AC) versus the cognition‐focused continuance commitment (CC) to the organization. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from 183 high‐tech employees. The quantitative results confirmed that vision formulation, content of social‐oriented values, and assimilation were positively related to AC to the organization, and unrelated to CC. The qualitative evidences deepened our understanding on the positive relationships of a balanced transcendental and realistic content of the vision and a high level of sharedness in vision assimilation processes to affective organizational commitment.

[1]  Michael D. Mumford,et al.  The origins of vision , 2002 .

[2]  B. Avolio,et al.  Impact of Transformational Leadership on Follower Development and Performance: A Field Experiment , 2002 .

[3]  B. Avolio,et al.  The relationship between vision strength, leadership style, and context ☆ , 2001 .

[4]  T. Judge,et al.  Five-factor model of personality and transformational leadership. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[5]  J. George.  Emotions and Leadership: The Role of Emotional Intelligence , 2000 .

[6]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Personality and job satisfaction: the mediating role of job characteristics. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Kristi M. Lewis.  When leaders display emotion: how followers respond to negative emotional expression of male and female leaders , 2000 .

[8]  T. Tremble,et al.  Transformational Leadership Effects at Different Levels of the Army , 2000 .

[9]  M. Bagshaw,et al.  Leadership in the twenty‐first century , 1999 .

[10]  William L. Gardner,et al.  Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance , 1999 .

[11]  Thomas W. Lee,et al.  Using Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research , 1998 .

[12]  R. N. Kanungo,et al.  Charismatic leadership in organizations , 1998 .

[13]  Richard E. Boyatzis,et al.  Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development , 1998 .

[14]  William E. Youngdahl,et al.  Leading the Total Quality Transformation at Goodyear-Oxo, Mexico , 1998 .

[15]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  A longitudinal study of the relation of vision and vision communication to venture growth in entrepreneurial firms. , 1998 .

[16]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Affective, Continuance, and Normative Commitment to the Organization: An Examination of Construct Validity , 1996, Journal of vocational behavior.

[17]  Alan Bryman,et al.  The importance of context: Qualitative research and the study of leadership , 1996 .

[18]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. , 1996 .

[19]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  The effects of transformational leadership on teacher attitudes and student performance in Singapore , 1995 .

[20]  Laurie Larwood,et al.  Structure And Meaning Of Organizational Vision , 1995 .

[21]  Blake E. Ashforth,et al.  Emotion in the Workplace: A Reappraisal , 1995 .

[22]  Rick D. Hackett,et al.  Further assessments of Bass's (1985) conceptualization of transactional and transformational leadership. , 1995 .

[23]  Alan J. Dubinsky,et al.  Transformational leadership theory: Using levels of analysis to determine boundary conditions. , 1994 .

[24]  Sherry J. Holladay,et al.  Speaking of Visions and Visions Being Spoken , 1994 .

[25]  J C Collins,et al.  Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies , 1994 .

[26]  S. Harris,et al.  Vision salience and strategic involvement: implications for psychological attachment to organization and job , 1994 .

[27]  K. Klein,et al.  Levels Issues in Theory Development, Data Collection, and Analysis , 1994 .

[28]  R. Hackett,et al.  Further assessments of Meyer and Allen's (1991) three-component model of organizational commitment. , 1994 .

[29]  M. Arthur,et al.  The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory , 1993 .

[30]  William McKinley,et al.  Organizational Decline and Adaptation: Theoretical Controversies , 1993 .

[31]  A. Bryman.  Charisma And Leadership In Organizations , 1993 .

[32]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers' trust in leader, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behaviors , 1990 .

[33]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[34]  John P. Kotter,et al.  A Force for Change , 1990 .

[35]  Marshall Sashkin,et al.  The visionary leader. , 1988 .

[36]  Noel M. Tichy,et al.  The Transformational Leader. , 1988 .

[37]  B. Bass.  LEADERSHIP AND PERFORMANCE BEYOND EXPECTATIONS , 1985 .

[38]  W. Bennis,et al.  Leaders: Strategies for Taking Charge , 1985 .

[39]  D. Hambrick,et al.  Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers , 1984 .

[40]  M. Hammersley.  Using qualitative methods , 1981 .