Keeping In Touch Everyday (KITE) project: developing assistive technologies with people with dementia and their carers to promote independence

ABSTRACT Background: The role of technology to facilitate independent living for people with dementia is not fully realized, with initial attempts (e.g. tracking devices) being considered unacceptable from a practical and ethical perspective. The aim of this study is to create acceptable and effective prototype technologies to facilitate independence for people with dementia through a user-centered design process involving them and their carers. Method: The study comprised a three-stage participatory design process: scoping stage (five focus groups, 10 people with dementia and 11 carers); participatory design stage (five workshops, 22 participants) and prototype development stage (four meetings with two people with dementia and one carer). Focus groups and workshops were digitally recorded, fully transcribed and subjected to constant comparative analysis. Results: People with mild to moderate dementia enjoy a variety of activities both on their own and with their families; however, concerns included getting lost, a loss of confidence with curtailment of usual activities, and carer anxiety. Existing technologies (mobile phones) were used intermittently. Participants felt strongly that future devices should be disguised and be integrated easily into their daily routines. Suggested areas for functional improvement included two-way communications, flexibility of function as the illness progresses, and something to “guide” them home when out walking or driving. Attention should also be focused on minimizing the size, weight and visibility of devices to reduce stigmatization. Conclusion: Prototypes for two devices (armband and electronic notepad) were developed. The study showed that involving people with dementia in the process of participatory design is feasible and could lead to devices which are more acceptable and relevant to their needs.

[1]  Katie Brittain,et al.  Balancing rights and risks: Conflicting perspectives in the management of wandering in dementia , 2007 .

[2]  Bleddyn P. Davies,et al.  Securing Good Care for Older People: Taking a Long-term View , 2007 .

[3]  Housing Lin,et al.  Department of Health White Paper - Our health our care our say: a new direction for community services , 2007 .

[4]  Mike Wu,et al.  Participatory design with individuals who have amnesia , 2004, PDC 04.

[5]  Mike Wu,et al.  Participatory design of an orientation aid for amnesics , 2005, CHI.

[6]  Panayiotis Zaphiris,et al.  LEARNING FROM PEOPLE WITH DEMENTIA TO DEVELOP RESEARCH METHODS FOR OLDER PEOPLE , 2004 .

[7]  E. Hanson,et al.  Working together with persons with early stage dementia and their family members to design a user-friendly technology-based support service , 2007 .

[8]  T. Adlam,et al.  Evaluation of a smart flat for people with dementia , 2007 .

[9]  Claire Bamford,et al.  Success and challenges in using focus groups with older people with dementia , 2002 .

[10]  Derek Wanless,et al.  Wanless social care review: securing good care for older people, taking a long-term view , 2006 .

[11]  Peter Gregor,et al.  “User sensitive inclusive design”— in search of a new paradigm , 2000, CUU '00.

[12]  L. Bright.  Living well in later life. , 2006, Nursing older people.

[13]  B. Tennison,et al.  Commission for Healthcare Audit and Inspection , 2004 .

[14]  M. Bloor,et al.  Focus Groups in Social Research , 2000 .

[15]  Derek Wanless,et al.  Securing Good Care for Older People: Taking a Long-Term View , 2006 .

[16]  Jacob Slonim,et al.  Requirements gathering with alzheimer's patients and caregivers , 2005, Assets '05.

[17]  R. Barbour.  Introducing Focus Groups , 2007 .

[18]  Peter Gregor,et al.  Designing for dynamic diversity: interfaces for older people , 2002, Assets '02.

[19]  K. Fenton.  Our health, our care, our say. , 2006, Nursing management.

[20]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups , 1995 .

[21]  Andrew Clement,et al.  Proceedings of the eighth conference on Participatory design: Artful integration: interweaving media, materials and practices - Volume 1 , 2004 .

[22]  B. Glaser.  The Constant Comparative Method of Qualitative Analysis , 1965 .

[23]  J. Bond,et al.  A systematic literature review of the effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions to prevent wandering in dementia and evaluation of the ethical implications and acceptability of their use. , 2006, Health technology assessment.

[24]  Alan F. Newell,et al.  Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people , 2004, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[25]  Roger Orpwood,et al.  The design of smart homes for people with dementia—user-interface aspects , 2005, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[26]  Alison Bowes,et al.  The Perspectives of People with Dementia , 2001 .

[27]  J. Kitzinger,et al.  Developing Focus Group Research: Politics, Theory and Practice , 1998 .

[28]  G. Grossberg,et al.  Behavioral and Psychological Symptoms of Dementia as a Risk Factor for Nursing Home Placement , 2000, International Psychogeriatrics.

[29]  Alison McKay,et al.  Delivering Mass-Produced Bespoke and Appealing Products , 2005 .

[30]  P. Kidd,et al.  Getting the Focus and the Group: Enhancing Analytical Rigor in Focus Group Research , 2000, Qualitative health research.

[31]  Boris OGUIBENINE,et al.  Long-term care and dementia services: an impending crisis. , 2006, Age and ageing.

[32]  H O Dickinson,et al.  Effectiveness and acceptability of non‐pharmacological interventions to reduce wandering in dementia: a systematic review , 2007, International journal of geriatric psychiatry.

[33]  Ronald Baecker,et al.  Using participatory activities with seniors to critique, build, and evaluate mobile phones , 2007, Assets '07.