Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence, safety and acceptability of Ornibel®, a new polymer composition contraceptive vaginal ring (etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.00/3.474 mg) compared with Nuvaring® (etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.7/2.7 mg)
暂无分享,去创建一个
Milton Furtado | J. Algorta | C. Ronchi | P. Regidor | M. Lefebvre | É. Sicard | Maria Diaz | R. de Benito | Raquel de Benito
[1] A. Faúndes,et al. Current status of contraceptive vaginal rings. , 2013, Contraception.
[2] Guideline on the pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation 4 of modified release dosage forms , 2013 .
[3] J. Esplugues,et al. Is the vagina an adequate route for the administration of hormonal contraceptives? , 2010, Current drug metabolism.
[4] Lynn Pattimakiel,et al. Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing®) , 2010, International journal of women's health.
[5] M. W. van den Heuvel,et al. Comparison of ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive formulations: the vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and an oral contraceptive. , 2005, Contraception.
[6] C. Loge,et al. The combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing: an international study of user acceptability. , 2003, Contraception.
[7] C. Timmer,et al. Pharmacokinetics of Etonogestrel and Ethinylestradiol Released from a Combined Contraceptive Vaginal Ring , 2000, Clinical pharmacokinetics.
[8] I. Fraser,et al. Efficacy, bleeding patterns, and side effects of a 1-year contraceptive vaginal ring. , 1999, Contraception.
[9] I. Fraser,et al. A comparative study of two contraceptive vaginal rings releasing norethindrone acetate and differing doses of ethinyl estradiol. , 1999, Contraception.
[10] I. Fraser,et al. Effect of different insertion regimens on side effects with a combination contraceptive vaginal ring. , 1997, Contraception.