Pharmacokinetic bioequivalence, safety and acceptability of Ornibel®, a new polymer composition contraceptive vaginal ring (etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.00/3.474 mg) compared with Nuvaring® (etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.7/2.7 mg)

Abstract Objective: To show the clinical development of Ornibel® (ExeltisHealthcare, Spain) a contraceptive vaginal ring manufactured with a new polymer composition and containing etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol, compared to Nuvaring® (MSD, Spain). Subjects and methods: Randomised, single dose, 2-period, 2-sequence, 2-stage crossover, comparative bioavailability study conducted in 40 healthy female subjects. All subjects received both treatments for 28 days in each of two periods, separated by a 28 days washout. Ornibel® contains etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.00/3.47 mg and Nuvaring® contains etonogestrel/ethinylestradiol 11.7/2.7 mg, both rings delivering 120/15 µg/day. For the calculation of pharmacokinetic parameters, 37 blood samples were collected up to 840 h after each ring insertion to quantify plasma concentrations of etonogestrel and ethinylestradiol using a validated MS/MS-HPLC. Safety was assessed by adverse events recording, clinical laboratory and vital signs and tolerability by vaginal examination. Acceptability was investigated by a 5-point scale questionnaire. Results: Bioequivalence was demonstrated in the first stage as the 94.12% Confidence Intervals of the primary parameters laid within the 80–125% acceptance range for both etonogestrel (Cmax: 96.81–112.20%; AUC0-504h: 98.71-108.61%; AUC0-t: 100.14–109.10%) and ethinylestradiol. (Cmax: 105.91–120.62%; AUC0-504h: 105.47–114.59%; AUC0-t: 108.31-117.61%). During the first day of use a burst effect was observed with Nuvaring®, with significantly higher level of ethinylestradiol (Cmax0-24h ratio: 78.34%, 94.12CI: 73.55–83.45%). Both products were well tolerated and accepted, without significant differences between them. Conclusion: Ornibel® is bioequivalent to Nuvaring® in terms of efficacy, safety, tolerability and acceptability. The new polymer composition provides Ornibel® with more stability and gradual hormonal release during the first day of use, particularly for ethinylestradiol.

[1]  A. Faúndes,et al.  Current status of contraceptive vaginal rings. , 2013, Contraception.

[2]  Guideline on the pharmacokinetic and clinical evaluation 4 of modified release dosage forms , 2013 .

[3]  J. Esplugues,et al.  Is the vagina an adequate route for the administration of hormonal contraceptives? , 2010, Current drug metabolism.

[4]  Lynn Pattimakiel,et al.  Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing®) , 2010, International journal of women's health.

[5]  M. W. van den Heuvel,et al.  Comparison of ethinylestradiol pharmacokinetics in three hormonal contraceptive formulations: the vaginal ring, the transdermal patch and an oral contraceptive. , 2005, Contraception.

[6]  C. Loge,et al.  The combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing: an international study of user acceptability. , 2003, Contraception.

[7]  C. Timmer,et al.  Pharmacokinetics of Etonogestrel and Ethinylestradiol Released from a Combined Contraceptive Vaginal Ring , 2000, Clinical pharmacokinetics.

[8]  I. Fraser,et al.  Efficacy, bleeding patterns, and side effects of a 1-year contraceptive vaginal ring. , 1999, Contraception.

[9]  I. Fraser,et al.  A comparative study of two contraceptive vaginal rings releasing norethindrone acetate and differing doses of ethinyl estradiol. , 1999, Contraception.

[10]  I. Fraser,et al.  Effect of different insertion regimens on side effects with a combination contraceptive vaginal ring. , 1997, Contraception.