Functional outcome of Latarjet for recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] A. Hardy,et al. Latarjet procedure enables 73% to return to play within 8 months depending on preoperative SIRSI and Rowe scores , 2021, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[2] L. Jazrawi,et al. No difference in 90-day complication rate following open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedure , 2020, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[3] C. Chillemi,et al. Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a 24-year follow-up study , 2020, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.
[4] L. Funk,et al. The Latarjet Procedure: Effective and Safe , 2019 .
[5] C. Gerber,et al. Long-term Results of the Open Latarjet Procedure for Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients Older Than 40 Years , 2019, The American journal of sports medicine.
[6] H. Mullett,et al. Long-term outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up. , 2019, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.
[7] P. Moroder,et al. Arthroscopic Versus Open Iliac Crest Bone Grafting in Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability With Glenoid Bone Loss: A Computed Tomography-Based Quantitative Assessment. , 2017, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.
[8] N. Verma,et al. The “Floating Labrum”: Bankart Lesion Repair With Anterior Capsular Extension Using 2 Anterior Working Portals , 2017, Arthroscopy techniques.
[9] B. Bach,et al. History of surgical intervention of anterior shoulder instability. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.
[10] K. Phan,et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical and patient-reported outcomes following two procedures for recurrent traumatic anterior instability of the shoulder: Latarjet procedure vs. Bankart repair. , 2016, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.
[11] O. Kherad,et al. Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[12] P. Randelli,et al. Open Latarjet versus arthroscopic Latarjet: clinical results and cost analysis , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[13] A. Lädermann,et al. Comparison of arthroscopic and open Latarjet with a learning curve analysis , 2015 .
[14] Feng-long Li,et al. Coracoid bone graft resorption after Latarjet procedure is underestimated: a new classification system and a clinical review with computed tomography evaluation. , 2015, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.
[15] P. Boileau,et al. The Open Latarjet Procedure Is More Reliable in Terms of Shoulder Stability Than Arthroscopic Bankart Repair , 2014, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.
[16] Shingo Oda,et al. Inter-sport variability of muscle volume distribution identified by segmental bioelectrical impedance analysis in four ball sports , 2013, Open access journal of sports medicine.
[17] G. Walch,et al. Coracoid graft dimensions after harvesting for the open Latarjet procedure. , 2013, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.
[18] J. Warner,et al. Short-term complications of the Latarjet procedure. , 2012, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.
[19] E. Makhni,et al. The Responsiveness of Patient- Reported Outcome Tools in Shoulder Surgery Is Dependent on the Underlying Pathological Condition , 2019, The American journal of sports medicine.
[20] A. Erşen,et al. Latarjet procedure using subscapularis split approach offers better rotational endurance than partial tenotomy for anterior shoulder instability , 2017, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.
[21] S. Burkhart,et al. Bankart repair. , 2012, Orthopedics.
[22] I. Lo,et al. Open Access Journal of Sports Medicine Dovepress Long-term Outcomes of the Bankart and Latarjet Repairs: a Systematic Review , 2022 .