Humanoid robot intervention in social skill augmentation of brain-impaired children: The ethics

This paper provides insights on the ethics involved in using humanoids for social skill augmentation of brain impaired children. For a developing nation like Malaysia, where tradition and religious values are of significant importance to the melting pot populace, an ethics draft or framework should be in place as humanoid assistive technology for brain-impaired children is new and at the infant stage. Furthermore, intervening into the inclusive environment of the special-needs children requires tact and diplomacy. Nevertheless, based on comprehensive library research and secondary data analysis, an ethic draft or framework is required because of the sensitivity to cultural norms. In addition, continued promotion of using human-like robots in educating and skilling the special-needs children will lead to a gradual understanding and acceptance for the teachers, caregivers, parents, and other stakeholders. As such, the ethical concerns are described and discussed including identifying ways in which robots could have a negative impact of impeding the access of the brain-impaired children to essential capabilities and the social implications of being around machines. It is also recommended that a policy on robotic assistive technology and pediatric psychology be drafted as this is a new area for Malaysia. Lastly, respect and dignity of the brain-impaired children should, at all times, be practiced as they too have their rights as a human being and a citizen of Malaysia.

[1]  F. Tanaka,et al.  Care-receiving robot as a tool of teachers in child education , 2010 .

[2]  Roderic A. Grupen,et al.  A follow-up on humanoid-mediated stroke physical rehabilitation , 2012, 2012 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[3]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Methodology & Themes of Human-Robot Interaction: A Growing Research Field , 2007 .

[4]  Elena Torta,et al.  Socially Assistive Robots: A Comprehensive Approach to Extending Independent Living , 2013, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[5]  Blay Whitby,et al.  Sometimes it's hard to be a robot: A call for action on the ethics of abusing artificial agents , 2008, Interact. Comput..

[6]  Paolo Dario,et al.  Humanoids and personal robots: Design and experiments , 2001, J. Field Robotics.

[7]  Noel Sharkey,et al.  The Ethical Frontiers of Robotics , 2008, Science.

[8]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  Theory of Mind for a Humanoid Robot , 2002, Auton. Robots.

[9]  Marina Fridin,et al.  Kindergarten social assistive robot: First meeting and ethical issues , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[10]  Jutta Weber,et al.  Helpless machines and true loving care givers: a feminist critique of recent trends in human-robot interaction , 2005, J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc..

[11]  M. Coeckelbergh Can we trust robots? , 2011, Ethics and Information Technology.

[12]  Aimee van Wynsberghe,et al.  A method for integrating ethics into the design of robots , 2013, Ind. Robot.

[13]  Ronald C. Arkin,et al.  Governing lethal behavior: Embedding ethics in a hybrid deliberative/reactive robot architecture part I: Motivation and philosophy , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[14]  B. Scassellati,et al.  Robots for use in autism research. , 2012, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[15]  U. Hoffmann Robot Ethics The Ethical And Social Implications Of Robotics , 2016 .

[16]  Kerstin Dautenhahn,et al.  Collaborating with Kaspar: Using an autonomous humanoid robot to foster cooperative dyadic play among children with autism , 2010, 2010 10th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[17]  Stephen Petersen,et al.  The ethics of robot servitude , 2007, J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell..

[18]  P. T. V. Bhuvaneswari,et al.  Humanoid robot based physiotherapeutic assistive trainer for elderly health care , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Recent Trends in Information Technology (ICRTIT).

[19]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .

[20]  Roger Slee,et al.  Establishing the foundations for an inclusive education system in Iraq: reflection on findings from a nationwide survey , 2013 .

[21]  G. Bekey,et al.  Robot Caregivers: Ethical Issues across the Human Lifespan , 2012 .

[22]  Shizuko Matsuzoe,et al.  教育支援ロボットの賢さの違いが子どもの英単語学習に及ぼす影響;教育支援ロボットの賢さの違いが子どもの英単語学習に及ぼす影響;The Difference of Excellence in Educational-support Robots Affects Children's Learning English Vocabularies , 2013 .

[23]  Xiaoan Yan,et al.  An affordable compact humanoid robot for autism spectrum disorder interventions in children , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[24]  Tanya N. Beran,et al.  Humanoid robotics in health care: An exploration of children’s and parents’ emotional reactions , 2015, Journal of health psychology.