Carbon storage and fluxes in ponderosa pine forests at different developmental stages

We compared carbon storage and fluxes in young and old ponderosa pine stands in Oregon, including plant and soil storage, net primary productivity, respiration fluxes, eddy flux estimates of net ecosystem exchange (NEE), and Biome‐BGC simulations of fluxes. The young forest (Y site) was previously an old‐growth ponderosa pine forest that had been clearcut in 1978, and the old forest (O site), which has never been logged, consists of two primary age classes (50 and 250 years old). Total ecosystem carbon content (vegetation, detritus and soil) of the O forest was about twice that of the Y site (21 vs. 10 kg C m−2 ground), and significantly more of the total is stored in living vegetation at the O site (61% vs. 15%). Ecosystem respiration (Re) was higher at the O site (1014 vs. 835 g C m−2 year−1), and it was largely from soils at both sites (77% of Re). The biological data show that above‐ground net primary productivity (ANPP), NPP and net ecosystem production (NEP) were greater at the O site than the Y site. Monte Carlo estimates of NEP show that the young site is a source of CO2 to the atmosphere, and is significantly lower than NEP(O) by c. 100 g C m−2 year−1. Eddy covariance measurements also show that the O site was a stronger sink for CO2 than the Y site. Across a 15‐km swath in the region, ANPP ranged from 76 g C m−2 year−1 at the Y site to 236 g C m−2 year−1 (overall mean 158 ± 14 g C m−2 year−1). The lowest ANPP values were for the youngest and oldest stands, but there was a large range of ANPP for mature stands. Carbon, water and nitrogen cycle simulations with the Biome‐BGC model suggest that disturbance type and frequency, time since disturbance, age‐dependent changes in below‐ground allocation, and increasing atmospheric concentration of CO2 all exert significant control on the net ecosystem exchange of carbon at the two sites. Model estimates of major carbon flux components agree with budget‐based observations to within ± 20%, with larger differences for NEP and for several storage terms. Simulations showed the period of regrowth required to replace carbon lost during and after a stand‐replacing fire (O) or a clearcut (Y) to be between 50 and 100 years. In both cases, simulations showed a shift from net carbon source to net sink (on an annual basis) 10–20 years after disturbance. These results suggest that the net ecosystem production of young stands may be low because heterotrophic respiration, particularly from soils, is higher than the NPP of the regrowth. The amount of carbon stored in long‐term pools (biomass and soils) in addition to short‐term fluxes has important implications for management of forests in the Pacific North‐west for carbon sequestration.

[1]  M. Harmon,et al.  A chronosequence of wood decomposition in the boreal forests of Russia , 2003 .

[2]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Total Belowground Carbon Allocation in a Fast-growing Eucalyptus Plantation Estimated Using a Carbon Balance Approach , 2002, Ecosystems.

[3]  B. Law,et al.  Water limitations to carbon exchange in old-growth and young ponderosa pine stands. , 2002, Tree physiology.

[4]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Leaf area distribution and radiative transfer in open-canopy forests: implications for mass and energy exchange. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[5]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Estimation of leaf area index in open-canopy ponderosa pine forests at different successional stages and management regimes in Oregon , 2001 .

[6]  B. Law,et al.  Use of a simulation model and ecosystem flux data to examine carbon-water interactions in ponderosa pine. , 2001, Tree physiology.

[7]  W. Parton,et al.  Long‐term dynamics of pine and hardwood litter in contrasting environments: toward a global model of decomposition , 2000 .

[8]  Christian Wirth,et al.  Managing Forests After Kyoto , 2000, Science.

[9]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of daily solar radiation and humidity from observed temperature and precipitation: an application over complex terrain in Austria. , 2000 .

[10]  Richard A. Birdsey,et al.  How to estimate carbon sequestration on small forest tracts. , 2000 .

[11]  M. G. Ryan,et al.  Transpiration and whole-tree conductance in ponderosa pine trees of different heights , 2000, Oecologia.

[12]  Dennis D. Baldocchi,et al.  Measuring and modelling seasonal variation of carbon dioxide and water vapour exchange of a Pinus ponderosa forest subject to soil water deficit , 2000 .

[13]  S. Running,et al.  Contribution of increasing CO2 and climate to carbon storage by ecosystems in the United States. , 2000, Science.

[14]  W. M. Post,et al.  Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential , 2000 .

[15]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Measurements of gross and net ecosystem productivity and water vapour exchange of a Pinus ponderosa ecosystem, and an evaluation of two generalized models , 2000 .

[16]  R. Gifford,et al.  Nitrogen accumulation and distribution in Danthonia richardsonii swards in response to CO2 and nitrogen supply over four years of growth , 2000 .

[17]  Richard A. Birdsey,et al.  Carbon sinks in the Kyoto Protocol: potential relevance for US forests. , 2000 .

[18]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Combining satellite data and biogeochemical models to estimate global effects of human‐induced land cover change on carbon emissions and primary productivity , 1999 .

[19]  Corinna Rebmann,et al.  Productivity of forests in the Eurosiberian boreal region and their potential to act as a carbon sink –‐ a synthesis , 1999 .

[20]  Houghton,et al.  The U.S. Carbon budget: contributions from land-Use change , 1999, Science.

[21]  B. Law,et al.  Carbon and water vapor exchange of an open-canopied ponderosa pine ecosystem , 1999 .

[22]  D. Baldocchi,et al.  Below-canopy and soil CO2 fluxes in a ponderosa pine forest , 1999 .

[23]  J. Norman,et al.  Evaluation of soil and vegetation heat flux predictions using a simple two-source model with radiometric temperatures for partial canopy cover , 1999 .

[24]  S. Running,et al.  An improved algorithm for estimating incident daily solar radiation from measurements of temperature, humidity, and precipitation , 1999 .

[25]  Michael G. Ryan,et al.  Seasonal and annual respiration of a ponderosa pine ecosystem , 1999 .

[26]  B. E. Lawa,et al.  Below-canopy and soil CO 2 ̄ uxes in a ponderosa pine forest , 1999 .

[27]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Regional ecosystem simulation: Combining surface- and satellite-based observations to study linkages between terrestrial energy and mass budgets , 1998 .

[28]  John M. Norman,et al.  Carbon distribution and aboveground net primary production in aspen, jack pine, and black spruce stands in Saskatchewan and Manitoba, Canada , 1997 .

[29]  John S. Kimball,et al.  BIOME-BGC simulations of stand hydrologic processes for BOREAS , 1997 .

[30]  D. Pury,et al.  Simple scaling of photosynthesis from leaves to canopies without the errors of big‐leaf models , 1997 .

[31]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Generating surfaces of daily meteorological variables over large regions of complex terrain , 1997 .

[32]  V. Monleon,et al.  Short- and long-term effects of prescribed underburning on nitrogen availability in ponderosa pine stands in central Oregon , 1997 .

[33]  David O. Wallin,et al.  Two Decades of Carbon Flux from Forests of the Pacific Northwest , 1996 .

[34]  J. Chen.  Optically-based methods for measuring seasonal variation of leaf area index in boreal conifer stands , 1996 .

[35]  J. William Munger,et al.  Measurements of carbon sequestration by long‐term eddy covariance: methods and a critical evaluation of accuracy , 1996 .

[36]  R. Keane,et al.  Simulating effects of fire on northern Rocky Mountain landscapes with the ecological process model FIRE-BGC. , 1996, Tree physiology.

[37]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Environmental Limits on Net Primary Production and Light‐Use Efficiency Across the Oregon Transect , 1994 .

[38]  Zhiliang Zhu,et al.  Forest resources of the United States, 1992. , 1993 .

[39]  Tilden P. Meyers,et al.  An open path, fast response infrared absorption gas analyzer for H2O and CO2 , 1992 .

[40]  Michael G. Ryan,et al.  A simple method for estimating gross carbon budgets for vegetation in forest ecosystems. , 1991, Tree physiology.

[41]  M. Harmon,et al.  Effects on Carbon Storage of Conversion of Old-Growth Forests to Young Forests , 1990, Science.

[42]  J. P. Kimmins,et al.  Above- and below-ground biomass and production of lodgepole pine on sites with differing soil moisture regimes , 1989 .

[43]  Estimating aboveground biomass of shrubs and young ponderosa and lodgepole pines in southcentral Oregon , 1986 .

[44]  William H. Schlesinger,et al.  Changes in Soil Carbon Storage and Associated Properties with Disturbance and Recovery , 1986 .

[45]  K. Vogt,et al.  Production, Turnover, and Nutrient Dynamics of Above- and Belowground Detritus of World Forests , 1986 .

[46]  Richard H. Waring,et al.  Forest Ecosystems: Analysis at Multiple Scales , 1985 .

[47]  Frans T. M. Nieuwstadt,et al.  Temperature measurement with a sonic anemometer and its application to heat and moisture fluxes , 1983 .

[48]  Henry L. Gholz,et al.  Environmental Limits on Aboveground Net Primary Production, Leaf Area, and Biomass in Vegetation Zones of the Pacific Northwest , 1982 .

[49]  K. Vogt,et al.  Biomass distribution and above- and below-ground production in young and mature Abiesamabilis zone ecosystems of the Washington Cascades , 1981 .

[50]  E. K. Webb,et al.  Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer , 1980 .

[51]  C. C. Grier,et al.  Old‐Growth Pseudotsuga menziesii Communities of a Western Oregon Watershed: Biomass Distribution and Production Budgets , 1977 .

[52]  P. F. Scholander,et al.  Sap Pressure in Vascular Plants , 1965, Science.

[53]  H. Fowells.  Silvics of forest trees of the United States. , 1965 .