SUMMARY Over five growing seasons (1976–80) experiments were carried out using at least three contrasting sites per season to study the relationship between growing conditions and storage losses in Pentland Crown potatoes. Crops were harvested by hand and storage was carried out in a single environment over a period of 6–7 months without sprout suppressants. The range in growing conditions was great and reflected in the pattern of leaf growth and range in yields of the stored crops (30–90 t/ha). Crops from Tenby (S. W. Wales) produced the most consistent and frequently the highest yields and usually lost the least weight during storage. Although the range in total weight loss over all experiments was large from 5·4 to 16·3%, treatment effects were much smaller than in field growth and yield. Delaying the date of harvest usually increased weight loss and tubers harvested in early August stored at least as well as late-harvested tubers. Tubers harvested without prior defoliation stored as well as tubers harvested on the same day from crops defoliated at least 2 weeks previously. Lengthening the interval from defoliation to harvest usually increased weight loss in storage. Although the tubers were hand harvested effects on saleability were found at the end of storage and there was no evidence that earlier harvesting, which may involve some loss of field yield, would result in any loss of saleable yield out of store. The results provided no evidence to support the widely-held view that the suitability of a tuber for harvesting improves during maturation associated with natural or imposed crop senescence. It is therefore suggested that the use of the term maturity be avoided as it is wholly unhelpful in studies of the relationship between field growth and storage losses in potatoes.
[1]
W. Burton,et al.
Use of γ‐radiation for preventing the sprouting of potatoes
,
1957
.
[2]
P. M. Harris,et al.
The Potato Crop: The scientific basis for improvement
,
1978
.
[3]
E. J. Allen.
Effects of date of planting on growth and yield of contrasting potato varieties in Pembrokeshire
,
1977,
The Journal of Agricultural Science.
[4]
W. G. Burton,et al.
The physics and physiology of storage
,
1978
.
[5]
C. Hampson,et al.
The effect of mechanical damage on potato crop wastage during storage.
,
1980
.
[6]
J. Moorby.
The physiology of growth and tuber yield
,
1978
.
[7]
D. L. Ebbels,et al.
Control of diseases of potatoes.
,
1984
.
[8]
E. J. Allen,et al.
Effects of date of planting on plant emergence, leaf growth, and yield in contrasting potato varieties
,
1983,
The Journal of Agricultural Science.
[9]
E. J. Allen,et al.
Effects of row width and planting density on growth and yield of two maincrop potato varieties. 2. Number of tubers, total and graded yields and their relationships with above-ground stem densities
,
1978,
The Journal of Agricultural Science.
[10]
R. K. Scott,et al.
An analysis of growth of the potato crop
,
1980,
The Journal of Agricultural Science.
[11]
R. K. Scott,et al.
Application of physiological and agronomic principles to the development of the potato industry
,
1978
.
[12]
J. vis,et al.
Soils of the Reading District.
,
1968
.