Quality Control-Driven Image Segmentation Towards Reliable Automatic Image Analysis in Large-Scale Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Aortic Cine Imaging

Recent progress in fully-automated image segmentation has enabled efficient extraction of clinical parameters in large-scale clinical imaging studies, reducing laborious manual processing. However, the current state-of-the-art automatic image segmentation may still fail, especially when it comes to atypical cases. Visual inspection of segmentation quality is often required, thus diminishing the improvements in efficiency. This drives an increasing need to enhance the overall data processing pipeline with robust automatic quality scoring, especially for clinical applications. We present a novel quality control-driven (QCD) framework to provide reliable segmentation using a set of different neural networks. In contrast to the prior segmentation and quality scoring methods, the proposed framework automatically selects the optimal segmentation on-the-fly from the multiple candidate segmentations available, directly utilizing the inherent Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) predictions. We trained and evaluated the framework on a large-scale cardiovascular magnetic resonance aortic cine image sequences from the UK Biobank Study. The framework achieved segmentation accuracy of mean DSC at 0.966, mean prediction error of DSC within 0.015, and mean error in estimating lumen area ≤17.6 mm2 for both ascending aorta and proximal descending aorta. This novel QCD framework successfully integrates the automatic image segmentation along with detection of critical errors on a per-case basis, paving the way towards reliable fully-automatic extraction of clinical parameters for large-scale imaging studies.

[1]  Timo Kohlberger,et al.  Evaluating Segmentation Error without Ground Truth , 2012, MICCAI.

[2]  Konrad Werys,et al.  Automated localization and quality control of the aorta in cine CMR can significantly accelerate processing of the UK Biobank population data , 2019, PloS one.

[3]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Automatic Quality Control of Cardiac MRI Segmentation in Large-Scale Population Imaging , 2017, MICCAI.

[5]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Inherent Brain Segmentation Quality Control from Fully ConvNet Monte Carlo Sampling , 2018, MICCAI.

[6]  P. Matthews,et al.  Imaging in population science: cardiovascular magnetic resonance in 100,000 participants of UK Biobank - rationale, challenges and approaches , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[7]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[8]  Xin Yang,et al.  Deep Learning Techniques for Automatic MRI Cardiac Multi-Structures Segmentation and Diagnosis: Is the Problem Solved? , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  D. Bluemke,et al.  Proximal aortic distensibility is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality and incident CV events: the MESA study. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Automated quality control in image segmentation: application to the UK Biobank cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study , 2019, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance.

[11]  Ben Glocker,et al.  Subject-level Prediction of Segmentation Failure using Real-Time Convolutional Neural Nets , 2018 .

[12]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Recurrent neural networks for aortic image sequence segmentation with sparse annotations , 2018, MICCAI.