Vowel articulation affected by word frequency

A frequently replicated finding is that the frequency of words affects their phonetic shape. In English, high frequency words have been shown to contain more centralized vowels than low frequency words. By contrast, a recent study on vowel articulation in German has shown a contrary finding. At the gestural level, tongue movements in HF words showed more extensive vowel targets and less coarticulationwith consonants. This paper further evaluates the later finding by taking into account a large set of verbs covering the continuum between high and low frequency. In addition to frequency the effects of two factors were analyzed: inflection (sagt vs. sagen) and speech rate (normal vs. fast). Our results imply that language experience increases the proficiency with which words are articulated: speakers are able to plan and target tongue movements earlier.

[1]  B. Munson,et al.  The effect of phonological neighborhood density on vowel articulation. , 2004, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[2]  B. Lindblom,et al.  Interaction between duration, context, and speaking style in English stressed vowels , 1994 .

[3]  Fermín Moscoso del Prado Martín,et al.  The simultaneous effects of inflectional paradigms and classes on lexical recognition: Evidence from Serbian , 2009 .

[4]  Benjamin V. Tucker,et al.  Danger and usefulness are detected early in auditory lexical processing: Evidence from electroencephalography , 2012, Brain and Language.

[5]  B. Munson,et al.  Phonological pattern frequency and speech production in adults and children. , 2001, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  B MacWhinney,et al.  Frequency and the lexical storage of regularly inflected forms , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[7]  G. Zipf The Psycho-Biology Of Language: AN INTRODUCTION TO DYNAMIC PHILOLOGY , 1999 .

[8]  S. Rapp Automatic Phonemic Transcription and Linguistic Annotation from Known Text with Hidden Markov Models , 1995 .

[9]  B. Munson Lexical Access , Lexical Representation , and Vowel Production , 2006 .

[10]  Thomas Becker Das Vokalsystem der deutschen Standardsprache , 1998 .

[11]  Alice Turk,et al.  The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A Functional Explanation for Relationships between Redundancy, Prosodic Prominence, and Duration in Spontaneous Speech , 2004, Language and speech.

[12]  G. Āllport The Psycho-Biology of Language. , 1936 .

[13]  Sneha V. Bharadwaj,et al.  Coarticulation in fricative-vowel syllables produced by children and adults: a preliminary report , 2001, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[14]  R. Harald Baayen,et al.  Word frequency, vowel length and vowel quality in speech production: an EMA study of the importance of experience , 2013, INTERSPEECH.

[15]  S. Gahl Time and Thyme Are not Homophones: The Effect of Lemma Frequency on Word Durations in Spontaneous Speech , 2008 .

[16]  Phil Hoole,et al.  Kinematic analysis of vowel production in German , 1994, ICSLP.

[17]  G. Zipf,et al.  The Psycho-Biology of Language , 1936 .