Learning to control orientation and force in a hammering task: The initial stage.

The ability to create stone tools is considered an important step in the emergence of human cognition. To further our understanding of these evolutionary processes we focused on the initial learning processes with which this percussive skill may be acquired. We studied a hammering task in which participants had to create a ground force vector by hitting a target on a force plate with a hammerstone. The produced ground force vector was presented as an arrow on a computer screen and had to end in a displayed target. The target could vary in its angle of azimuth and inclination. Over 5 days, three of the five participants adapted a wrist joint angle and two of these three participants adapted a shoulder joint angle that affected only angle of inclination of the ground force vector. Length and angle of azimuth of the ground force vector were not affected. In learning to control a hammering task, the first parameter to be manipulated seems to be the angle of inclination by adjusting the wrist and shoulder join...

[1]  P. Greenfield,et al.  Language, tools and brain: The ontogeny and phylogeny of hierarchically organized sequential behavior , 1991, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[2]  J. Pelegrin,et al.  Remarks about archaeological techniques and methods of knapping : elements of a cognitive approach to stone knapping , 2005 .

[3]  C. Michaels,et al.  Information and action in punching a falling ball , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[4]  R. Milo,et al.  Tools, language and cognition in human evolution , 1995, International Journal of Primatology.

[5]  T. Wynn Archaeology and cognitive evolution. , 2002, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[6]  Rob Withagen,et al.  Individual differences in learning to perceive length by dynamic touch: Evidence for variation in perceptual learning capacities , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[7]  E. Biryukova,et al.  Organization of goal-directed action at a high level of motor skill: the case of stone knapping in India. , 2008, Motor control.

[8]  K. Newell Motor skill acquisition. , 1991, Annual review of psychology.

[9]  D. Stout Skill and Cognition in Stone Tool Production , 2002, Current Anthropology.

[10]  S. Ambrose Paleolithic Technology and Human Evolution , 2001, Science.

[11]  Raoul M Bongers,et al.  Variations of Tool and Task Characteristics Reveal That Tool-Use Postures Are Anticipated , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  G. Dietrich,et al.  Skills and learning difficulties involved in stone knapping: The case of stone‐bead knapping in Khambhat, India , 1995 .

[13]  J. A. Adams,et al.  Warm-up decrement in performance on the pursuit-rotor. , 1952, The American journal of psychology.

[14]  Josep Maria Vergès,et al.  What novice knappers have to learn to become expert stone toolmakers , 2010 .

[15]  Jaap Harlaar,et al.  Complete 3D kinematics of upper extremity functional tasks. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[16]  D. Domkin,et al.  Structure of joint variability in bimanual pointing tasks , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[17]  Rajiv Ranganathan,et al.  Motor Learning through Induced Variability at the Task Goal and Execution Redundancy Levels , 2010, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  T. Chaminade,et al.  The evolutionary neuroscience of tool making , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  R. Bongers,et al.  Joint angle variability and co-variation in a reaching with a rod task , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[20]  A. Smitsman,et al.  Geometries and Dynamics of a Rod Determine How It Is Used for Reaching , 2003, Journal of motor behavior.

[21]  B. Bril,et al.  How do stone knappers predict and control the outcome of flaking? Implications for understanding early stone tool technology. , 2010, Journal of human evolution.

[22]  D. Sternad,et al.  Decomposition of variability in the execution of goal-oriented tasks: three components of skill improvement. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Blandine Bril,et al.  Stone knapping : the necessary conditions for a uniquely hominin behaviour , 2005 .

[24]  K. Newell,et al.  Time scales in motor learning and development. , 2001, Psychological review.

[25]  Harold L. Dibble,et al.  Introducing a new experimental design for controlled studies of flake formation: results for exterior platform angle, platform depth, angle of blow, velocity, and force , 2009 .

[26]  Aldo A. Faisal,et al.  The Manipulative Complexity of Lower Paleolithic Stone Toolmaking , 2010, PloS one.

[27]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[28]  B. Richmond,et al.  Upper limb kinematics and the role of the wrist during stone tool production. , 2010, American journal of physical anthropology.

[29]  Gilles Dietrich,et al.  The role of expertise in tool use: skill differences in functional action adaptations to task constraints. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  A. Berthelet,et al.  The Use of tools by human and non-human primates , 1993 .

[31]  H. Dibble,et al.  The Effect of Hammer Mass and Velocity on Flake Mass , 1995 .