Self-citations, a trend prevalent across subject disciplines at the global level: an overview

Purpose The present study aims to determine the prevailing trend of self-citations across 27 major subject disciplines at global level. The study also examines the aspects like percentage of self-citations in each individual subject discipline and the average number of self-citations per publication across different subject disciplines. The study also investigates self-citation percentage of research articles published from the 20 leading research countries of the world and across the continents. Design/methodology/approach The study is supported by empirical findings undertaken on secondary data retrieved from SCImago Journal and Country Ranking, which is entirely based on the SCOPUS data source (SCImago, 2014). Findings In all, 76,634,557 citations were received by as many as 14,946,975 research articles published from 2008-2012 at an average of 5.12 citations per article. Of the total citations received, 26,404,609 (34.45 per cent) were self-citations, which means that of the total citations received by each research article, 1.76 are self-citations. Compared to subject disciplines falling under social and humanistic sciences, pure and applied sciences have shown a greater trend of self-citation. On average, 4.18 self-citations were observed in each research article published in multidisciplinary subject disciplines. Of the total citations received by research articles published in the discipline of Psychology, 43.69 per cent are self-citations, the highest among all the subject disciplines under study. Of the total self-citations received by all the subject disciplines under study, 18.43 per cent were received alone in medicine, highest among all, whereas Social and Humanistic sciences received less than 1.00 per cent self-citations, the lowest among all the subject disciplines. Originality/value This study is original and first of its kind covering each individual subject discipline having global scope.

[1]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Journal impact factors and self-citations: implications for psychology journals. , 2004, The American psychologist.

[2]  Dag W. Aksnes,et al.  A macro study of self-citation , 2003, Scientometrics.

[3]  Shivendra Singh,et al.  Impact of Self-Citations on Impact Factor: A Study Across Disciplines, Countries and Continents , 2015 .

[4]  Juan Miguel Campanario,et al.  Large increases and decreases in journal impact factors in only one year: The effect of journal self-citations , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  J. Neuberger,et al.  Impact factors: uses and abuses , 2002, European journal of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[6]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  The influence of international collaboration on the impact of research results , 1998, Scientometrics.

[7]  Hajime Eto Interdisciplinary information input and output of a nano-technology project , 2004, Scientometrics.

[8]  A. Paraskeva,et al.  Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor. , 2000, British journal of anaesthesia.

[9]  A. Sevinç,et al.  Manipulating impact factor: an unethical issue or an Editor's choice? , 2004, Swiss medical weekly.

[10]  Marco A. Molina-Montenegro,et al.  Insights into the relationship between the h -index and self-citations , 2009 .

[11]  Ernesto Gianoli,et al.  Insights into the relationship between the h-index and self-citations , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[13]  E. Garfield Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. 1955. , 1955, International journal of epidemiology.

[14]  J. G. Adair,et al.  The explosion of knowledge, references, and citations. Psychology's unique response to a crisis. , 2003, The American psychologist.

[15]  P. Gross,et al.  COLLEGE LIBRARIES AND CHEMICAL EDUCATION. , 1927, Science.

[16]  Marcel Ausloos,et al.  Self-citations, co-authorships and keywords: A new approach to scientists’ field mobility? , 2007, Scientometrics.

[17]  Leif Engqvist,et al.  The h-index and self-citations. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[18]  R Brian Haynes,et al.  Author self-citation in the diabetes literature , 2004, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[19]  Shivendra Singh,et al.  Oncology Research Output and its Citation Analysis at Continental Level: A Study (2003-2012) , 2014, International Letters of Natural Sciences.