Circuit design for multi-body interactions in superconducting quantum annealing systems with applications to a scalable architecture

Quantum annealing provides a way of solving optimization problems by encoding them as Ising spin models which are implemented using physical qubits. The solution of the optimization problem then corresponds to the ground state of the system. Quantum tunneling is harnessed to enable the system to move to the ground state in a potentially high non-convex energy landscape. A major difficulty in encoding optimization problems in physical quantum annealing devices is the fact that many real world optimization problems require interactions of higher connectivity, as well as multi-body terms beyond the limitations of the physical hardware. In this work we address the question of how to implement multi-body interactions using hardware which natively only provides two-body interactions. The main result is an efficient circuit design of such multi-body terms using superconducting flux qubits in which effective N-body interactions are implemented using N ancilla qubits and only two inductive couplers. It is then shown how this circuit can be used as the unit cell of a scalable architecture by applying it to a recently proposed embedding technique for constructing an architecture of logical qubits with arbitrary connectivity using physical qubits which have nearest-neighbor four-body interactions. It is further shown that this design is robust to non-linear effects in the coupling loops, as well as mismatches in some of the circuit parameters.Quantum computing: Superconducting multi-qubit interaction circuitsA new method to build devices which implement interactions between more than two qubits in quantum annealing systems similar to those produced by D-Wave Systems has been proposed by a collaboration from UCL, Durham University, and the University of Oxford led by Paul Warburton. Such interactions occur naturally in many real world optimization problems. They demonstrate that constructing these circuits is experimentally feasible in the near term, and discuss how additional degrees of freedom included in their technique could help solve problems more efficiently. This new coupler design opens up a wide array of new architectural possibilities for these devices, as well as new ways in which they could solve problems, potentially leading to a new generation of more efficient quantum annealers.

[1]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Quantum annealing with manufactured spins , 2011, Nature.

[2]  Andrea Rocchetto,et al.  Stabilizers as a design tool for new forms of the Lechner-Hauke-Zoller annealer , 2016, Science Advances.

[3]  A. Young,et al.  Solving the Graph Isomorphism Problem with a Quantum Annealer , 2012, 1207.1712.

[4]  J. D. Biamonte,et al.  Ground-state spin logic , 2012, 1205.1742.

[5]  P. Zoller,et al.  A quantum annealing architecture with all-to-all connectivity from local interactions , 2015, Science Advances.

[6]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Experimental investigation of an eight-qubit unit cell in a superconducting optimization processor , 2010, 1004.1628.

[7]  Vicky Choi,et al.  Adiabatic Quantum Algorithms for the NP-Complete Maximum-Weight Independent Set, Exact Cover and 3SAT Problems , 2010, ArXiv.

[8]  David P. DiVincenzo,et al.  The complexity of stoquastic local Hamiltonian problems , 2006, Quantum Inf. Comput..

[9]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Simulated-quantum-annealing comparison between all-to-all connectivity schemes , 2016, 1603.03755.

[10]  G. Rose,et al.  Finding low-energy conformations of lattice protein models by quantum annealing , 2012, Scientific Reports.

[11]  Rosenbaum,et al.  Quantum annealing of a disordered magnet , 1999, Science.

[12]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Probing for quantum speedup in spin-glass problems with planted solutions , 2015, 1502.01663.

[13]  Alán Aspuru-Guzik,et al.  Bayesian network structure learning using quantum annealing , 2014, The European Physical Journal Special Topics.

[14]  Alec Maassen van den Brink,et al.  Mediated tunable coupling of flux qubits , 2005 .

[15]  Antonio Auffinger,et al.  Random Matrices and Complexity of Spin Glasses , 2010, 1003.1129.

[16]  H. Katzgraber,et al.  Optimizing glassy p-spin models. , 2010, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  P. Zoller,et al.  A transmon quantum annealer: decomposing many-body Ising constraints into pair interactions , 2016, 1604.02359.

[18]  S. Knysh,et al.  Quantum Optimization of Fully-Connected Spin Glasses , 2014, 1406.7553.

[19]  Walter Vinci,et al.  Maximum-Entropy Inference with a Programmable Annealer , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[20]  Bryan O'Gorman,et al.  A case study in programming a quantum annealer for hard operational planning problems , 2014, Quantum Information Processing.

[21]  J. Clarke,et al.  The flux qubit revisited to enhance coherence and reproducibility , 2015, Nature Communications.

[22]  Aidan Roy,et al.  Discrete optimization using quantum annealing on sparse Ising models , 2014, Front. Phys..

[23]  Yann LeCun,et al.  Explorations on high dimensional landscapes , 2014, ICLR.

[24]  W. Macready,et al.  Image recognition with an adiabatic quantum computer I. Mapping to quadratic unconstrained binary optimization , 2008, 0804.4457.

[25]  S. C. Benjamin,et al.  A Direct Mapping of Max k-SAT and High Order Parity Checks to a Chimera Graph , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Evidence for quantum annealing with more than one hundred qubits , 2013, Nature Physics.

[27]  Yann LeCun,et al.  The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networks , 2014, AISTATS.

[28]  Ryan Babbush,et al.  What is the Computational Value of Finite Range Tunneling , 2015, 1512.02206.

[29]  Firas Hamze,et al.  Glassy Chimeras could be blind to quantum speedup: Designing better benchmarks for quantum annealing machines , 2014, 1401.1546.

[30]  Vicky Choi,et al.  Minor-embedding in adiabatic quantum computation: II. Minor-universal graph design , 2010, Quantum Inf. Process..

[31]  M. W. Johnson,et al.  Compound Josephson-junction coupler for flux qubits with minimal crosstalk , 2009, 0904.3784.

[32]  Daniel A. Lidar,et al.  Max 2-SAT with up to 108 qubits , 2013, 1307.3931.

[33]  J. Biamonte Non−perturbative k−body to two−body commuting conversion Hamiltonians and embedding problem instances into Ising spins , 2008, 0801.3800.

[34]  Firas Hamze,et al.  Seeking Quantum Speedup Through Spin Glasses: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly , 2015, 1505.01545.

[35]  M. Benedetti,et al.  Estimation of effective temperatures in quantum annealers for sampling applications: A case study with possible applications in deep learning , 2015, 1510.07611.

[36]  V. Semenov,et al.  Inductance of Circuit Structures for MIT LL Superconductor Electronics Fabrication Process With 8 Niobium Layers , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity.

[37]  Hermann Bondi,et al.  The good, the bad and the ugly , 1988, Nature.

[38]  T. Cubitt,et al.  Simple universal models capture all classical spin physics , 2014, Science.

[39]  G. Rose,et al.  Construction of model Hamiltonians for adiabatic quantum computation and its application to finding low-energy conformations of lattice protein models , 2008, 0801.3625.

[40]  D. Sherrington Physics and Complexity: An Introduction , 2014 .