Bayesian inference of structural error in inverse models of thermal response tests

For the design of ground-source heat pumps (GSHPs), two design parameters, namely the ground thermal conductivity and borehole thermal resistance are estimated by interpreting thermal response test (TRT) data using a physical model. In most cases, the parameters are fitted to the measured data assuming that the chosen model can fully reproduce the actual physical response. However, two significant sources of error make the estimation uncertain: random error from experiments and structural bias error that describes the discrepancy between the model and actual physical phenomena. Generally, these two error sources are not evaluated separately. As a result, the suitability of selected models to correctly infer parameters from TRTs are not well understood. In this study, the Bayesian calibration framework proposed by Kennedy and O’Hagan is employed to estimate the GSHP design parameters and quantify the random and structural errors in the inference. The calibration framework enables us to examine structural errors in the commonly used infinite line source model arising due to the conditions in which the TRT takes place. Two in situ TRT datasets were used: TRT1, influenced by contextual disturbances from the outdoor environment, and TRT2, influenced by a strong groundwater flow caused by heavy rainfall. We show that the Bayesian calibration framework is able to quantify the structural errors in the TRT interpretation and therefore can yield more accurate estimates of design parameters with full quantification of uncertainties.

[1]  Esmail M. A. Mokheimer,et al.  Energy, exergy and uncertainty analyses of the thermal response test for a ground heat exchanger , 2009 .

[2]  J. Seibert,et al.  Groundwater dynamics in a till hillslope: flow directions, gradients and delay , 2011 .

[3]  Petr Bujok,et al.  Assessment of the influence of shortening the duration of TRT (thermal response test) on the precision of measured values , 2014 .

[4]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Interpretation of disturbed data in thermal response tests using the infinite line source model and numerical parameter estimation method , 2015 .

[5]  G. Box Science and Statistics , 1976 .

[6]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Bayesian inference for thermal response test parameter estimation and uncertainty assessment , 2018 .

[7]  K. Zhu,et al.  A moving finite line source model to simulate borehole heat exchangers with groundwater advection , 2011 .

[8]  James E. Campbell,et al.  An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part I—Introduction, Input Variable Selection and Preliminary Variable Assessment , 1981 .

[9]  R. Schincariol,et al.  Effect of thermal-hydrogeological and borehole heat exchanger properties on performance and impact of vertical closed-loop geothermal heat pump systems , 2014, Hydrogeology Journal.

[10]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[11]  S. Chib,et al.  Understanding the Metropolis-Hastings Algorithm , 1995 .

[12]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[13]  A. OHagan,et al.  Bayesian analysis of computer code outputs: A tutorial , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Daniel Pahud,et al.  Numerical evaluation of thermal response tests , 2007 .

[15]  Astrid Maute,et al.  Emulating the Thermosphere-Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIE-GCM) , 2007 .

[16]  P. Whitfield,et al.  Groundwater level responses in temperate mountainous terrain: regime classification, and linkages to climate and streamflow , 2010 .

[17]  S. Signorelli,et al.  Geoscientific investigations for the use of shallow low-enthalpy systems , 2004 .

[18]  Dave Higdon,et al.  Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[19]  P. F. Córdoba,et al.  Improving parameter estimates obtained from thermal response tests: Effect of ambient air temperatur , 2011 .

[20]  Majdi Hazami,et al.  In-field performance analysis of ground source cooling system with horizontal ground heat exchanger in Tunisia , 2013 .

[21]  E. Iso,et al.  Measurement Uncertainty and Probability: Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement , 1995 .

[22]  O. J. Zobel,et al.  Heat conduction with engineering and geological applications , 1948 .

[23]  L. Rosenhead Conduction of Heat in Solids , 1947, Nature.

[24]  Daniel Castro-Fresno,et al.  How to correct the ambient temperature influence on the thermal response test results , 2015 .

[25]  Lin Lu,et al.  Experimental studies on a ground coupled heat pump with solar thermal collectors for space heating , 2011 .

[26]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[27]  D. Nutter,et al.  A Ground Resistance for Vertical Bore Heat Exchangers With Groundwater Flow , 2003 .

[28]  Yan Shang,et al.  Intermittent experimental study of a vertical ground source heat pump system , 2014 .

[29]  J. Spitler,et al.  In Situ Measurement of Ground Thermal Conductivity: A Dutch Perspective , 2002 .

[30]  Z. Fang,et al.  Heat transfer in ground heat exchangers with groundwater advection , 2004 .

[31]  H. Witte,et al.  Error analysis of thermal response tests , 2013 .

[32]  Jinzhong Hu,et al.  An improved analytical model for vertical borehole ground heat exchanger with multiple-layer substrates and groundwater flow , 2017 .

[33]  Yeonsook Heo,et al.  Calibration of building energy models for retrofit analysis under uncertainty , 2012 .

[34]  Sherif L. Abdelaziz,et al.  Counterbalancing ambient interference on thermal conductivity tests for energy piles , 2015 .

[35]  R. Ooka,et al.  Effect of natural convection on thermal response test conducted in saturated porous formation: Comparison of gravel-backfilled and cement-grouted borehole heat exchangers , 2016 .

[36]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[37]  W. K. Hastings,et al.  Monte Carlo Sampling Methods Using Markov Chains and Their Applications , 1970 .

[38]  Pingfang Hu,et al.  A method and case study of thermal response test with unstable heat rate , 2012 .

[39]  J. Bear Dynamics of Fluids in Porous Media , 1975 .

[40]  John K Kruschke,et al.  Bayesian data analysis. , 2010, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[41]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Effect of disturbance on thermal response test, part 1: Development of disturbance analytical model, parametric study, and sensitivity analysis , 2016 .

[42]  Xiaosong Zhang,et al.  Long term coupled simulation for ground source heat pump and underground heat exchangers , 2015 .

[43]  J. Beck,et al.  Field Test of a New Method for Determining Soil Formation Thermal Conductivity and Borehole Resistance , 2000 .

[44]  Ryozo Ooka,et al.  Effect of disturbance on thermal response test, part 2: Numerical study of applicability and limitation of infinite line source model for interpretation under disturbance from outdoor environment , 2016 .

[45]  Kadir Bakirci,et al.  Effect of a superheating and sub-cooling heat exchanger to the performance of a ground source heat pump system , 2012 .

[46]  A. Busso,et al.  First in situ determination of ground and borehole thermal properties in Latin America , 2004 .

[47]  Astrid Maute,et al.  Bayesian calibration of the Thermosphere-Ionosphere Electrodynamics General Circulation Model (TIE-GCM) , 2009 .

[48]  S. Standard GUIDE TO THE EXPRESSION OF UNCERTAINTY IN MEASUREMENT , 2006 .