Category-specificity in visual object recognition
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S M Kosslyn,et al. Identifying objects seen from different viewpoints. A PET investigation. , 1994, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[2] C. Price,et al. A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[3] Manila Vannucci,et al. Hemispheric asymmetry for spatially filtered stimuli belonging to different semantic categories. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[4] S. Kosslyn,et al. Identifying objects at different levels of hierarchy: A positron emission tomography study , 1995 .
[5] Toby J. Lloyd-Jones,et al. Outline shape is a mediator of object recognition that is particularly important for living things , 2002, Memory & cognition.
[6] G. Humphreys,et al. Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[7] T. Hendler,et al. A hierarchical axis of object processing stages in the human visual cortex. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.
[8] H. Bülthoff,et al. Perceptual Organization of Local Elements into Global Shapes in the Human Visual Cortex , 2003, Current Biology.
[9] Keith R. Laws,et al. “Illusions of Normality”: a Methodological Critique of Category-Specific Naming , 2005, Cortex.
[10] Toby J. Lloyd-Jones,et al. Sources of error in picture naming under time pressure , 2007, Memory & cognition.
[11] David Gaffan,et al. A Spurious Category-Specific Visual Agnosia for Living Things in Normal Human and Nonhuman Primates , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[12] D. Navon. Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception , 1977, Cognitive Psychology.
[13] Christian Gerlach,et al. Structural similarity causes different category-effects depending on task characteristics , 2001, Neuropsychologia.
[14] Matthew H. Davis,et al. Is there an anatomical basis for category-specificity? Semantic memory studies in PET and fMRI , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[15] A J Parkin,et al. Naming Impairments following Recovery from Herpes Simplex Encephalitis: Category-Specific? , 1992, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[16] T. Sanocki. Time course of object identification: evidence for a global-to-local contingency. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[17] Marta Kutas,et al. Neurophysiological Evidence for the Time Course of Activation of Global Shape, Part, and Local Contour Representations during Visual Object Categorization and Memory , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[18] S. Kosslyn. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[19] K. Cave,et al. Can We Lose Memories of Faces? Content Specificity and Awareness in a Prosopagnosic , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[20] D. Caplan,et al. Cognition, emotion and the cerebellum. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[21] L. Miller,et al. Category-specific knowledge deficit for animals in a patient with herpes simplex encephalitis , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[22] K. A. Hadland,et al. The Effect of Cingulate Cortex Lesions on Task Switching and Working Memory , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[23] R. Knight,et al. Component mechanisms underlying the processing of hierarchically organized patterns: inferences from patients with unilateral cortical lesions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[24] Mark M Schira,et al. Differential contribution of early visual areas to the perceptual process of contour processing. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.
[25] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Texture segregation in the human visual cortex: A functional MRI study. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.
[26] M. Kiefer,et al. Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization , 2001, Memory & cognition.
[27] J. Rodd,et al. Anteromedial temporal cortex supports fine-grained differentiation among objects. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.
[28] A Berthoz,et al. Visual perception of motion and 3-D structure from motion: an fMRI study. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.
[29] J. Desmond,et al. Neuroimaging studies of the cerebellum: language, learning and memory , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[30] Tim M. Gale,et al. The influence of surface and edge-based visual similarity on object recognition , 2003, Brain and Cognition.
[31] Measuring the influence of similarity on category-specific effects , 2008 .
[32] A. Caramazza,et al. WHAT ARE THE FACTS OF SEMANTIC CATEGORY-SPECIFIC DEFICITS? A CRITICAL REVIEW OF THE CLINICAL EVIDENCE , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[33] Christian Gerlach,et al. A case of impaired shape integration: Implications for models of visual object processing , 2005 .
[34] Paul Schrater,et al. Shape perception reduces activity in human primary visual cortex , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[35] Giuseppe Sartori,et al. The oyster with four legs: A neuropsychological study on the interaction of visual and semantic information , 1998 .
[36] R. Poldrack,et al. Dissociable Controlled Retrieval and Generalized Selection Mechanisms in Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex , 2005, Neuron.
[37] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. The role of visual similarity in picture categorization. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[38] G. Humphreys,et al. Category specificity in brain and mind , 2002 .
[39] S. Edelman,et al. Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.
[40] N Birbaumer,et al. Category-specific semantic impairment in Alzheimer's disease and temporal lobe dysfunction: a comparative study. , 1994, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.
[41] G. Humphreys,et al. Object identification in simultanagnosia: When wholes are not the sum of their parts , 2004, Cognitive Neuropsychology.
[42] Elaine Funnell,et al. Categories of knowledge? unfamiliar aspects of living and nonliving things , 1992 .
[43] N. Davey,et al. Visual Similarity is Greater for Line Drawings of Nonliving Than Living Things: The Importance of Musical Instruments and Body Parts , 2002, Brain and Cognition.
[44] M. Farah,et al. Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[45] D. Westwood,et al. Manipulability and living/non-living category effects on object identification , 2005, Brain and Cognition.
[46] F. Lucchelli,et al. Are Semantic Systems Separately Represented in the Brain? The Case of Living Category Impairment , 1994, Cortex.
[47] Karl J. Friston,et al. A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.
[48] Johan Wagemans,et al. Identification of Everyday Objects on the Basis of Fragmented Outline Versions , 2008, Perception.
[49] E. Warrington,et al. The bare bones of object recognition: implications from a case of object recognition impairment , 1999, Neuropsychologia.
[50] R. Kimchi,et al. Perceptual organization in vision : behavioral and neural perspectives , 2003 .
[51] M. Behrmann. Neuropsychological Approaches to Perceptual Organization , 2006 .
[52] Rafael Malach,et al. Rapid completion effects in human high-order visual areas , 2004, NeuroImage.
[53] S. Thompson-Schill. Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: inferring “how” from “where” , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[54] Guido Gainotti,et al. What the Locus of Brain Lesion Tells us About the Nature of the Cognitive Defect Underlying Category-Specific Disorders: A Review , 2000, Cortex.
[55] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Do Pixel-Level Analyses Describe Psychological Perceptual Similarity? A Comment on ‘Category-Specific Naming and the ‘Visual’ Characteristics of Line Drawn Stimuli’ by Laws and Gale , 2002, Cortex.
[56] T. Gale,et al. Crowded and sparse domains in object recognition: Consequences for categorization and naming , 2006, Brain and Cognition.
[57] R. Cabeza,et al. Imaging Cognition II: An Empirical Review of 275 PET and fMRI Studies , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[58] Martin Arguin,et al. Semantic and Visual Determinants of Face Recognition in a Prosopagnosic Patient , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[59] B. Laeng,et al. The visual basis of category effects in object identification: Evidence from the visual hemifield paradigm , 2006, Brain and Cognition.
[60] A. Dale,et al. Functional Analysis of V3A and Related Areas in Human Visual Cortex , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[61] M. Bar,et al. Cortical Mechanisms Specific to Explicit Visual Object Recognition , 2001, Neuron.
[62] Keith R. Laws,et al. Gender Affects Naming Latencies for Living and Nonliving Things: Implications for Familiarity , 1999, Cortex.
[63] O. Paulson,et al. Perceptual differentiation and category effects in normal object recognition: a PET study. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[64] D. Pollen,et al. Spatial and temporal frequency selectivity of neurons in visual cortical area V3A of the macaque monkey , 1988, Vision Research.
[65] M. Ernst,et al. The statistical determinants of adaptation rate in human reaching. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[66] K. Laws,et al. A ‘normal’ category-specific advantage for naming living things , 1999, Neuropsychologia.
[67] S. Pitzalis,et al. Identification of fragmented pictures in patients with brain damage. , 1998, Applied Neuropsychology.
[68] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. On Naming a Giraffe a Zebra: Picture Naming Errors Across Different Object Categories , 1993 .
[69] Giuseppe Sartori,et al. Semantic relevance explains category effects in medial fusiform gyri , 2006, NeuroImage.
[70] Category-Specific Effects in Object Identification: What is “Normal”? , 2005, Cortex.
[71] Karl J. Friston,et al. Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .
[72] Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al. A voxel‐based morphometry study of semantic dementia: Relationship between temporal lobe atrophy and semantic memory , 2000, Annals of neurology.
[73] M. Tarr,et al. DOES VISUAL SUBORDINATE-LEVEL CATEGORISATION ENGAGE THE FUNCTIONALLY DEFINED FUSIFORM FACE AREA? , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[74] Irene P. Kan,et al. Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[75] J. Schmahmann,et al. The cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[76] G W Humphreys,et al. Memories are made of this: the effects of time on stored visual knowledge in a case of visual agnosia. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[77] M. Bar. A Cortical Mechanism for Triggering Top-Down Facilitation in Visual Object Recognition , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[78] Johan Wagemans,et al. Time-course contingencies in perceptual organization and identification of fragmented object outlines. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[79] J. G. Snodgrass,et al. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.
[80] Johan Wagemans,et al. Identification of Everyday Objects on the Basis of Silhouette and Outline Versions , 2007, Perception.
[81] S. Zeki. A vision of the brain , 1993 .
[82] A. Caramazza,et al. The organisation of conceptual knowledge in the brain: The future's past and some future directions , 2006, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[83] T. Gale,et al. The Effect of ‘Masking’ on Picture Naming , 2002, Cortex.
[84] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Perceptual differentiation as a source of category effects in object processing: Evidence from naming and object decision , 1997, Memory & cognition.
[85] K. Laws,et al. LOSS OF STORED KNOWLEDGE OF OBJECT STRUCTURE: IMPLICATIONS FOR “CATEGORY-SPECIFIC” DEFICITS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[86] G W Humphreys,et al. The Effects of Surface Detail on Object Categorization and Naming , 1989, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[87] E. Forde,et al. The role of local and global processing in the recognition of living and nonliving things , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[88] Marlene Behrmann,et al. Impairments in part–whole representations of objects in two cases of integrative visual agnosia , 2007, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[89] M. Vannucci,et al. Identification of spatially filtered stimuli as function of the semantic category. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[90] Johan Wagemans,et al. The representation of subordinate shape similarity in human occipitotemporal cortex. , 2008, Journal of vision.
[91] I Law,et al. Brain activity related to integrative processes in visual object recognition: bottom-up integration and the modulatory influence of stored knowledge , 2002, Neuropsychologia.
[92] Bradford Z. Mahon,et al. The organization of conceptual knowledge: the evidence from category-specific semantic deficits , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[93] Karl J. Friston,et al. Anatomic Constraints on Cognitive Theories of Category Specificity , 2002, NeuroImage.
[94] Keith R. Laws,et al. The impact of colour, spatial resolution, and presentation speed on category naming , 2006, Brain and Cognition.
[95] Christian Gerlach,et al. A Review of Functional Imaging Studies on Category Specificity , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[96] A. Olson,et al. Does normal processing provide evidence of specialised semantic subsystems? , 2005 .
[97] The influence of visual and nonvisual attributes in visual object identification , 2006, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.
[98] T. Hendler,et al. Object-completion effects in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.
[99] Kenji Kawano,et al. Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex , 1999, Nature.
[100] Martin Arguin,et al. Shape Integration for Visual Object Recognition and Its Implication in Category-Specific Visual Agnosia , 1996 .
[101] Olaf B. Paulson,et al. Structural similarity and category-specificity: a refined account , 2004, Neuropsychologia.
[102] Alfonso Caramazza,et al. The interpretation of semantic category-specific deficits: What do they reveal about the organizatio , 1998 .
[103] P. Fletcher,et al. DO SEMANTIC CATEGORIES ACTIVATE DISTINCT CORTICAL REGIONS? EVIDENCE FOR A DISTRIBUTED NEURAL SEMANTIC SYSTEM , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[104] L. K. Tyler,et al. Conceptual Structure and the Structure of Concepts: A Distributed Account of Category-Specific Deficits , 2000, Brain and Language.
[105] Ravi S. Menon,et al. The effects of visual object priming on brain activation before and after recognition , 2000, Current Biology.
[106] E. Funnell. Apperceptive agnosia and the visual recognition of object categories in dementia of the Alzheimer type , 2000 .
[107] R. Thatcher. Functional neuroimaging : technical foundations , 1994 .
[108] M. Behrmann,et al. Independent representation of parts and the relations between them: evidence from integrative agnosia. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[109] F. Kitterle,et al. Symmetries and asymmetries in the processing of sinusoidal gratings , 1991 .
[110] R. Adolphs,et al. Neural systems behind word and concept retrieval , 2004, Cognition.
[111] Lynn C. Robertson,et al. Attention and interference in the processing of global and local information: Effects of unilateral temporal-parietal junction lesions , 1989, Neuropsychologia.
[112] Jane E. Joseph,et al. Effects of structural similarity on neural substrates for object recognition , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[113] M. Posner,et al. Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[114] Olaf B. Paulson,et al. Shape configuration and category-specificity , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[115] Cathy J. Price,et al. Fusiform Activation to Animals is Driven by the Process, Not the Stimulus , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[116] A. Dale,et al. The Representation of Illusory and Real Contours in Human Cortical Visual Areas Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[117] Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al. Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.
[118] Randall J. Frank,et al. Explaining category-related effects in the retrieval of conceptual and lexical knowledge for concrete entities: operationalization and analysis of factors , 1997, Neuropsychologia.
[119] R. Job,et al. Category-specific form-knowledge deficit in a patient with herpes simplex virus encephalitis , 1993 .
[120] M Poncet,et al. The role of sensorimotor experience in object recognition. A case of multimodal agnosia. , 1991, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[121] Glyn W Humphreys,et al. A CASE SERIES ANALYSIS OF “CATEGORY-SPECIFIC” DEFICITS OF LIVING THINGS:THE HIT ACCOUNT , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[122] T. Gale,et al. Category-Specific Naming and the ‘Visual’ Characteristics of Line Drawn Stimuli , 2002, Cortex.
[123] P. Coppens,et al. Category-specific naming effect in non-brain-damaged individuals , 2005, Brain and Language.
[124] Martha J. Farah,et al. Category-specificity and modality-specificity in semantic memory , 1989, Neuropsychologia.
[125] Karl J. Friston,et al. Voxel-Based Morphometry of Herpes Simplex Encephalitis , 2001, NeuroImage.
[126] M. M. Meyer,et al. Can recognotion of living things be selectively impaired? , 1991, Neuropsychologia.
[127] Kalanit Grill-Spector,et al. Semantic versus perceptual priming in fusiform cortex , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[128] G. Humphreys,et al. A case of integrative visual agnosia. , 1987, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[129] The Heterogeneity of Category-Specific Semantic Disorders: Evidence from a New Case , 2003, Neurocase.
[130] Karl J. Friston,et al. Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .
[131] T. Sanocki. Interaction of scale and time during object identification. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[132] R. Kimchi. Visual Perceptual Organization: A Microgenetic Analysis , 2003 .
[133] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .
[134] K. Grill-Spector,et al. The dynamics of object-selective activation correlate with recognition performance in humans , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[135] Emmanuel A Stamatakis,et al. The Anatomy of Object Processing: The Role of Anteromedial Temporal Cortex , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology.
[136] A. Chatterjee,et al. A deficit of intermediate vision: Experimental observations and theoretical implications , 1999 .
[137] Karl J. Friston,et al. Statistical parametric mapping , 2013 .
[138] Glyn W. Humphreys,et al. A tale of two agnosias: Distinctions between form and integrative agnosia , 2008, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[139] M. Torrens. Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .
[140] R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al. Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: the effect of stimulus category , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[141] S. Edelman,et al. Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .