A critical look at design automation solutions for collaborative MDO in the AGILE paradigm

This paper presents a critical discussion on the automated problem formulation and workflow creation approach developed within the European project AGILE to support and accelerate the setup of aircraft MDO workflows in a large, heterogeneous team of experts. The developed framework is based on a methodological approach, called the AGILE paradigm, where a complete MDO system is formulated and executed in five main steps. In Step I the requirements are collected, in Step II a repository of disciplinary tools is established, in Step III the design optimization problem is formulated and structured according to a selected MDO architecture, in Step IV an executable workflow is assembled and finally operated in Step V. All steps have been streamlined and highly automated through the development of a novel set of MDO support applications and data standards, addressed as the AGILE MDO framework. This framework was tested through a series of design campaigns culminating with four design tasks, where a variety of unconventional aircraft configurations is collaboratively designed using MDO. After a brief introduction on the AGILE paradigm and the four design tasks, this paper will focus on a set of AGILE framework core components enabling the automated process to formulate and execute collaborative MDO systems. The strengths and current limitations of these components are discussed, based on the extensive feedback from the heterogeneous set of specialists involved in the four design tasks. Although drastic reductions in the setup time of an MDO system (up to 40 percent) appear to be already achievable, recommendations are provided to improve the flexibility, usability and scalability of the framework.

[1]  G. La Rocca,et al.  A Fully Automated Chain from MDAO Problem Formulation to Workflow Execution , 2017 .

[2]  Volker Gollnick,et al.  Communication in aircraft design : Can we establish a common language? , 2012 .

[3]  Eike Stumpf,et al.  Graph-based algorithms and data-driven documents for formulation and visualization of large MDO systems , 2018, CEAS Aeronautical Journal.

[4]  Pier Davide Ciampa,et al.  Knowledge architecture supporting collaborative MDO in the AGILE paradigm , 2017 .

[5]  John E. Renaud,et al.  Response surface based, concurrent subspace optimization for multidisciplinary system design , 1996 .

[6]  Kenneth T. Moore,et al.  OpenMDAO: An Open Source Framework for Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization , 2010 .

[7]  James Barron,et al.  Streamlining cross-organisation product design in aeronautics , 2017 .

[8]  Gary Belie Non-Technical Barriers to Multidisciplinary Optimization in the Aerospace Industry , 2002 .

[9]  Gianfranco La Rocca,et al.  Composing MDAO symphonies : Graph-based generation and manipulation of large multidisciplinary systems , 2017 .

[10]  Riccardo Lombardi,et al.  Collaborative Architecture supporting AGILE Design of Complex Aeronautics Products , 2017 .

[11]  Daniël de Vries Towards the Industrialization of MDAO: Evolving 1st Generation MDAO to an Industry Ready Level of Maturity , 2017 .

[12]  Martin Spieck,et al.  MDO: assessment and direction for advancement—an opinion of one international group , 2009 .

[13]  G. La Rocca,et al.  Knowledge based engineering techniques to support aircraft design and optimization , 2011 .

[14]  Pier Davide Ciampa,et al.  The AGILE Paradigm: the next generation of collaborative MDO , 2017 .

[15]  Maurice F. M. Hoogreef,et al.  CMDOWS: a proposed new standard to store and exchange MDO systems , 2018 .

[16]  Pier Davide Ciampa,et al.  Avoiding Inconsistencies between Data Models in Collaborative Aircraft Design Processes , 2016 .

[17]  S. Shahpar,et al.  Challenges to overcome for routine usage of automatic optimisation in the propulsion industry , 2011, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[18]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Extensions to the design structure matrix for the description of multidisciplinary design, analysis, and optimization processes , 2012, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[19]  Joaquim R. R. A. Martins,et al.  Multidisciplinary design optimization: A survey of architectures , 2013 .