Mechanistic aspects of the fracture toughness of elk antler bone.

Bone is an adaptive material that is designed for different functional requirements; indeed, bones have a variety of properties depending on their role in the body. To understand the mechanical response of bone requires the elucidation of its structure-function relationships. Here, we examine the fracture toughness of compact bone of elk antler, which is an extremely fast-growing primary bone designed for a totally different function than human (secondary) bone. We find that antler in the transverse (breaking) orientation is one of the toughest biological materials known. Its resistance to fracture is achieved during crack growth (extrinsically) by a combination of gross crack deflection/twisting and crack bridging via uncracked "ligaments" in the crack wake, both mechanisms activated by microcracking primarily at lamellar boundaries. We present an assessment of the toughening mechanisms acting in antler as compared to human cortical bone, and identify an enhanced role of inelastic deformation in antler which further contributes to its (intrinsic) toughness.

[1]  R O Ritchie,et al.  Re-evaluating the toughness of human cortical bone. , 2006, Bone.

[2]  Steve Weiner,et al.  THE MATERIAL BONE: Structure-Mechanical Function Relations , 1998 .

[3]  V. Ebner.  Über den feineren Bau der Knochensubstanz , 1875 .

[4]  P Zioupos,et al.  Changes in the stiffness, strength, and toughness of human cortical bone with age. , 1998, Bone.

[5]  Horacio Dante Espinosa,et al.  An Experimental Investigation of Deformation and Fracture of Nacre–Mother of Pearl , 2007 .

[6]  J. Rice,et al.  Slightly curved or kinked cracks , 1980 .

[7]  R. Ritchie.  Mechanisms of fatigue crack propagation in metals, ceramics and composites: Role of crack tip shielding☆ , 1988 .

[8]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Measurement of the toughness of bone: a tutorial with special reference to small animal studies. , 2008, Bone.

[9]  Richard J. Goss,et al.  Deer Antlers: Regeneration, Function and Evolution , 1983 .

[10]  P Zioupos,et al.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone. , 1998, Medical engineering & physics.

[11]  P. Fratzl,et al.  Inhomogeneous fibril stretching in antler starts after macroscopic yielding: indication for a nanoscale toughening mechanism. , 2009, Bone.

[12]  J. McKittrick,et al.  Comparison of the structure and mechanical properties of bovine femur bone and antler of the North American elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis). , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[13]  Michael F. Ashby,et al.  The mechanical efficiency of natural materials , 2004 .

[14]  J. Currey,et al.  Influence of physiological effort of growth and chemical composition on antler bone mechanical properties. , 2007, Bone.

[15]  Y. Yeni,et al.  Calculation of porosity and osteonal cement line effects on the effective fracture toughness of cortical bone in longitudinal crack growth. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[16]  Wolfgang Wagermaier,et al.  Cooperative deformation of mineral and collagen in bone at the nanoscale , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  J. J. Mecholsky,et al.  How tough is bone? Application of elastic-plastic fracture mechanics to bone. , 2007, Bone.

[18]  Deepak Vashishth,et al.  Rising crack-growth-resistance behavior in cortical bone: implications for toughness measurements. , 2004, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Markus J Buehler,et al.  Deformation and failure of protein materials in physiologically extreme conditions and disease. , 2009, Nature materials.

[20]  D Vashishth,et al.  Experimental validation of a microcracking-based toughening mechanism for cortical bone. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  Yasuaki Seki,et al.  Biological materials: Structure and mechanical properties , 2008 .

[22]  R O Ritchie,et al.  The true toughness of human cortical bone measured with realistically short cracks. , 2008, Nature materials.

[23]  P Zioupos,et al.  An examination of the micromechanics of failure of bone and antler by acoustic emission tests and Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy. , 1994, Medical engineering & physics.

[24]  W. Grellmann,et al.  Deformation and Fracture Behaviour of Polymers , 2001 .

[25]  R. Ritchie,et al.  On the Fracture Toughness of Advanced Materials , 2009 .

[26]  J. Knott.  Fundamentals of fracture mechanics , 1973 .

[27]  E. Vajda,et al.  Cement lines of secondary osteons in human bone are not mineral-deficient: new data in a historical perspective. , 2005, The anatomical record. Part A, Discoveries in molecular, cellular, and evolutionary biology.

[28]  D. Vashishth.  Small animal bone biomechanics. , 2008, Bone.

[29]  R. M. Cannon,et al.  Mechanics and mechanisms of crack growth at or near ceramic-metal interfaces: interface engineering strategies for promoting toughness , 1993 .

[30]  M. C. Nichols,et al.  X-Ray Tomographic Microscopy (XTM) Using Synchrotron Radiation , 1992 .

[31]  Jeffrey A Platt,et al.  Evaluation of fracture toughness of human dentin using elastic-plastic fracture mechanics. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[32]  D B Burr,et al.  Composition of the cement line and its possible mechanical role as a local interface in human compact bone. , 1988, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  W. Grellmann.  New Developments in Toughness Evaluation of Polymers and Compounds by Fracture Mechanics , 2001 .

[34]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Molecular nanomechanics of nascent bone: fibrillar toughening by mineralization , 2007 .

[35]  J. Currey,et al.  Mechanical properties of bone tissues with greatly differing functions. , 1979, Journal of biomechanics.

[36]  Paul K. Hansma,et al.  Plasticity and toughness in bone , 2009 .

[37]  R O Ritchie,et al.  Mechanistic aspects of fracture and R-curve behavior in human cortical bone. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[38]  Paul K. Hansma,et al.  Bone indentation recovery time correlates with bond reforming time , 2001, Nature.

[39]  Markus J. Buehler,et al.  Nature designs tough collagen: Explaining the nanostructure of collagen fibrils , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  John H. Underwood,et al.  Compliance of a three-point bend specimen at load line , 1984 .

[41]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Mechanistic fracture criteria for the failure of human cortical bone , 2003, Nature materials.

[42]  V. Cnudde,et al.  Software tools for quantification of X-ray microtomography at the UGCT , 2007 .

[43]  Jacqueline A. Cutroni,et al.  Sacrificial bonds and hidden length dissipate energy as mineralized fibrils separate during bone fracture , 2005, Nature materials.

[44]  Paul Roschger,et al.  From brittle to ductile fracture of bone , 2006, Nature materials.

[45]  Anthony G. Evans,et al.  Crack deflection processes—I. Theory , 1983 .

[46]  D Vashishth,et al.  Crack growth resistance in cortical bone: concept of microcrack toughening. , 1997, Journal of biomechanics.

[47]  Richard Weinkamer,et al.  Nature’s hierarchical materials , 2007 .

[48]  R. Ritchie,et al.  Mixed-mode fracture of human cortical bone. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[49]  J. Currey.  The design of mineralised hard tissues for their mechanical functions. , 1999, The Journal of experimental biology.

[50]  S. Stover,et al.  Equine cortical bone exhibits rising R-curve fracture mechanics. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[51]  H. Rolf,et al.  Hard fallow deer antler: A living bone till antler casting? , 1999, The Anatomical record.