An explorative analysis of user evaluation studies in information visualisation

This paper presents an analysis of user studies from a review of papers describing new visualisation applications and uses these to highlight various issues related to the evaluation of visualisations. We first consider some of the reasons why the process of evaluating visualisations is so difficult. We then dissect the problem by discussing the importance of recognising the nature of experimental design, datasets and participants as well as the statistical analysis of results. We propose explorative evaluation as a method of discovering new things about visualisation techniques, which may give us a better understanding of the mechanisms of visualisations. Finally we give some practical guidance on how to do evaluation correctly.

[1]  Melanie Tory,et al.  Evaluating Visualizations: Do Expert Reviews Work? , 2005, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[2]  Alan Dix,et al.  Causing Trouble with Buttons , 1994 .

[3]  Catherine Plaisant,et al.  The challenge of information visualization evaluation , 2004, AVI.

[4]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  Scatter/gather browsing communicates the topic structure of a very large text collection , 1996, CHI.

[5]  David H. Laidlaw,et al.  Thoughts on User Studies: Why, How and When , 1993 .

[6]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Edgelens: an interactive method for managing edge congestion in graphs , 2003, IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization 2003 (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8714).

[7]  Victoria Interrante,et al.  User Studies: Why, How, and When? , 2003, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[8]  Jean-Daniel Fekete,et al.  Excentric Labeling: Dynamic Neighborhood Labeling for Data Visualization , 2003 .

[9]  Matthew O. Ward,et al.  Interactive hierarchical displays: a general framework for visualization and exploration of large multivariate data sets , 2003, Comput. Graph..

[10]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  LifeLines: visualizing personal histories , 1996, CHI.

[11]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Ordered and quantum treemaps: Making effective use of 2D space to display hierarchies , 2002, TOGS.

[12]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Getting around the task-artifact cycle: how to make claims and design by scenario , 1992, TOIS.

[13]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  Optimizing search by showing results in context , 2001, CHI.

[14]  Susan T. Dumais,et al.  WaveLens: a new view onto Internet search results , 2004, CHI.

[15]  Ann Borthwick,et al.  The Tyranny of Evaluation: Is There a Role for the Student?. , 1982 .

[16]  Alan J. Dix,et al.  The sampling lens: making sense of saturated visualisations , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[17]  Ramana Rao,et al.  An organic user interface for searching citation links , 1995, CHI '95.

[18]  Linden J. Ball,et al.  Exploring the PieTree for Representing Numerical Hierarchical Data , 2007 .