Electrophysiological correlates of the differential outcomes effect in visual short-term memory.

The differential outcomes procedure (DOP) consists in applying a specific outcome after each discriminative stimulus-correct response pairing, leading to improved performance in both memory and learning tasks (faster acquisition and/or higher response accuracy), compared to the non-differential outcomes procedure (NOP). The main aim of this study was to explore the electrophysiological correlates (ERPs) of the DOP in a visual short-term memory task, and to test whether a differential activation pattern would be observed depending on the outcomes condition (DOP vs. NOP). The ERP signals showed differences between both outcomes condition in all three phases of the short-term memory task: encoding, maintenance and retrieval. Our results are in accordance with the view that in the DOP condition the probe stimulus triggers a representation of the unique outcome, which remains active over the maintenance period (prospective process). In the NOP condition, in contrast, a representation of the probe stimulus is maintained (retrospective process). In addition, these results suggested that stimuli associated with unique outcomes captured attention involuntary at retrieval, decreasing the interference from distractor stimuli in the retrieval phase.

[1]  L. Savage In search of the neurobiological underpinnings of the differential outcomes effect , 2001, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[2]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Value-driven attentional priority signals in human basal ganglia and visual cortex , 2014, Brain Research.

[3]  C. Antunez,et al.  Improving delayed face recognition in Alzheimer's disease by differential outcomes. , 2012, Neuropsychology.

[4]  P. Downing,et al.  Interactions Between Visual Working Memory and Selective Attention , 2000, Psychological science.

[5]  A. Mecklinger,et al.  Event-related potentials reveal topographical and temporal distinct neuronal activation patterns for spatial and object working memory. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[6]  D. Foti,et al.  Teasing apart the anticipatory and consummatory processing of monetary incentives: An event-related potential study of reward dynamics. , 2015, Psychophysiology.

[7]  M. A. Trapold,et al.  Are expectancies based upon different positive reinforcing events discriminably different , 1970 .

[8]  J. Polich Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Ginesa López-Crespo,et al.  Differential outcomes training improves face recognition memory in children and in adults with Down syndrome. , 2014, Research in developmental disabilities.

[10]  Sander Nieuwenhuis,et al.  Mediofrontal negativities in the absence of responding. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  R. Nusslock,et al.  Motivated to win: Relationship between anticipatory and outcome reward-related neural activity , 2015, Brain and Cognition.

[12]  W. Ritter,et al.  The scalp topography of potentials associated with missing visual or auditory stimuli. , 1976, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  Magdalena Méndez-López,et al.  Visual working memory in deaf children with diverse communication modes: improvement by differential outcomes. , 2012, Research in developmental disabilities.

[14]  S Makeig,et al.  Blind separation of auditory event-related brain responses into independent components. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. Grafman,et al.  Distinctions and similarities among working memory processes: an event-related potential study. , 1992, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[16]  M. Tsolaki,et al.  Enhancement of Visuospatial Working Memory by the Differential Outcomes Procedure in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer’s Disease , 2018, Front. Aging Neurosci..

[17]  D. Elliffe,et al.  Quantifying the effects of the differential outcomes procedure in humans: A systematic review and a meta-analysis. , 2019, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[18]  Santosh Mathan,et al.  EEG indices of reward motivation and target detectability in a rapid visual detection task , 2013, NeuroImage.

[19]  M. Turatto,et al.  Reward associations impact both iconic and visual working memory , 2015, Vision Research.

[20]  Christian N L Olivers,et al.  Interactions between visual working memory and visual attention. , 2008, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[21]  Adam Gazzaley,et al.  Neural Suppression of Irrelevant Information Underlies Optimal Working Memory Performance , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  L. Savage,et al.  Memory enhancement in aged rats: the differential outcomes effect. , 1999, Developmental psychobiology.

[23]  P. Marí-Beffa,et al.  Training with differential outcomes enhances discriminative learning and visuospatial recognition memory in children born prematurely. , 2012, Research in developmental disabilities.

[24]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[25]  Mengyuan Gong,et al.  Learned reward association improves visual working memory. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  T. Picton,et al.  The N1 wave of the human electric and magnetic response to sound: a review and an analysis of the component structure. , 1987, Psychophysiology.

[27]  Raddy L. Ramos,et al.  Reward expectation alters learning and memory: The impact of the amygdala on appetitive-driven behaviors , 2009, Behavioural Brain Research.

[28]  G. Potts Impact of reward and punishment motivation on behavior monitoring as indexed by the error-related negativity. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[29]  Overmier Jb,et al.  Discriminative cue properties of different fears and their role in response selection in dogs. , 1971 .

[30]  Narun Pornpattananangkul,et al.  Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing. , 2018, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[31]  D. R. Ramirez,et al.  The effects of hippocampal lesions on learning, memory, and reward expectancies , 2004, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[32]  D. Ruchkin,et al.  Short-term memory storage and retention: an event-related brain potential study. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  Carlos M. Gómez,et al.  Fronto-parietal networks activation during the contingent negative variation period , 2007, Brain Research Bulletin.

[34]  D. Ruchkin,et al.  Working memory and preparation elicit different patterns of slow wave event-related brain potentials. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[35]  Steven Yantis,et al.  Learned Value Magnifies Salience-Based Attentional Capture , 2011, PloS one.

[36]  The differential outcomes procedure can interfere or enhance operant rule learning , 2003, Integrative physiological and behavioral science : the official journal of the Pavlovian Society.

[37]  G. López-Crespo,et al.  Improvement of age-related memory deficits by differential outcomes , 2009, International Psychogeriatrics.

[38]  L. W. Mok Short-term retrospective versus prospective memory processing as emergent properties of the mind and brain: Human fMRI evidence , 2012, Neuroscience.

[39]  A. Vivas,et al.  Spatial working memory is enhanced in children by differential outcomes , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[40]  Patryk A. Laurent,et al.  Value-driven attentional capture , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  P. Urcuioli,et al.  Behavioral and associative effects of differential outcomes in discrimination learning , 2005, Learning & behavior.

[42]  A. Vivas,et al.  Visual recognition memory enhancement in children through differential outcomes. , 2014, Acta psychologica.

[43]  J. Overmier,et al.  Neural correlates of cue-unique outcome expectations under differential outcomes training: An fMRI study , 2009, Brain Research.

[44]  G. Peterson,et al.  Effects of altering outcome expectancies on pigeons' delayed conditional discrimination performance , 1980 .

[45]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Attention Modulates Maintenance of Representations in Visual Short-term Memory , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  Differential Outcomes Training Ameliorates Visual Memory Impairments in Patients With Alzheimer’s Disease: A Pilot Study , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[47]  P. Marí-Beffa,et al.  Does the implicit outcomes expectancies shape learning and memory processes? , 2019, Cognition.