Methods for Detecting Pediatric Adverse Drug Reactions From the Electronic Medical Record

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are common yet are often underreported, making them difficult to track and study. Prospective pharmacovigilance programs significantly increase detection and reporting of ADRs. The aim of this pilot study was to apply triggers used by a prospective pharmacovigilance program at a freestanding children's hospital to retrospectively detect ADRs at our institution, therefore determining if these methods could be replicated and provide the basis for implementation of a prospective pharmacovigilance program. In 2019, our institution had 22 000 inpatient admissions and 51 000 emergency room visits and had 21 ADRs voluntarily reported in an electronic medication safety tracking system. Additional ADRs were identified by methods including new or modified entries to a patient's allergy profile in the electronic medical record (EMR) and International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes. We identified 754 unique patients with changes to allergy profile and 5719 ICD codes in 3966 unique patients to evaluate. These triggers prompted screening of the EMR to validate the ADR, and we identified 280 ADRs occurring in 2019. Eight (2.8%) were identified solely by the electronic medication safety tracking system, 64 (23%) were identified by the allergy list, 110 (39%) were identified only by ICD coding, and the remaining 98 (35%) were identified by multiple methods. The use of triggers followed by review of the EMR identified 13‐fold more ADRs than were voluntarily reported, illustrating the need for an active pharmacovigilance service and the successful use of multimodal methods to detect and track ADRs.

[1]  J. Goldman,et al.  Enhancing Pediatric Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation in the Electronic Medical Record , 2020, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[2]  J. Goldman,et al.  Characterization of Severe Adverse Drug Reactions at a Free‐Standing Children's Hospital , 2019, Journal of clinical pharmacology.

[3]  E. Macy,et al.  Large Health System Databases and Drug Hypersensitivity. , 2019, The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice.

[4]  P. Ekmekci,et al.  Healthcare professionals’ pharmacovigilance knowledge and adverse drug reaction reporting behavior and factors determining the reporting rates , 2019, Journal of drug assessment.

[5]  Wei-Na He,et al.  Analysis of a pharmacist-led adverse drug event management model for pharmacovigilance in an academic medical center hospital in China , 2018, Therapeutics and clinical risk management.

[6]  Babu Ganesan,et al.  Study on the Classification, Causality, Preventability and Severity of Adverse Drug Reaction Using Spontaneous Reporting System in Hospitalized Patients , 2018, Pharmacy.

[7]  David C. Classen,et al.  National trends in safety performance of electronic health record systems in children’s hospitals , 2017, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[8]  R. Vaillancourt,et al.  Accuracy of Adverse Drug Reaction Documentation upon Implementation of an Ambulatory Electronic Health Record System , 2016, Drugs - Real World Outcomes.

[9]  Anandi V Law,et al.  Adverse Drug Reactions Among Children Over a 10-Year Period , 2006, Pediatrics.

[10]  Charlene R. Weir,et al.  Critical Gaps in the World's Largest Electronic Medical Record: Ad Hoc Nursing Narratives and Invisible Adverse Drug Events , 2003, AMIA.

[11]  P. Schneider,et al.  Preventability and severity assessment in reporting adverse drug reactions. , 1992, American journal of hospital pharmacy.

[12]  T. Prosser,et al.  Multidisciplinary adverse drug reaction surveillance program. , 1990, American journal of hospital pharmacy.