Environmental effect of space debris repositioning

Abstract One of the proposed measures to limit the number of near-Earth orbiting fragments to a sustainable level is to actively remove large derelict objects from crowded orbital regions. The two main removal procedures considered so far are (1) a direct targeted reentry maneuver or (2) a deorbit maneuver resulting in a predicted 25-year lifetime for the target object. We study here the viability of a third option, which consists of repositioning the target to an optimally chosen altitude according to a selected benefit/cost objective function. The objective function accounts for both the maneuver cost and the reduction of environmental criticality of the object. Numerical simulations are conducted to determine the optimal sequence of repositioning maneuvers for a given available deorbiting propellant. Results show that an optimal repositioning campaign tends to displace ton-class objects from around 900–1000 km altitude down to around 750–800 km altitude and to redistribute debris mass from altitudes around 1500 km across lower density nearby altitudes. Comparisons with a 25-year lifetime deorbiting suggest a significant performance improvement.

[1]  Holger Krag,et al.  Deriving a priority list based on the environmental criticality , 2014 .

[2]  J. Peláez,et al.  A new set of integrals of motion to propagate the perturbed two-body problem , 2013 .

[3]  Holger Krag,et al.  Assessment of breakup severity on operational satellites , 2016 .

[4]  S. Flegel,et al.  Active debris removal of multiple priority targets , 2013 .

[5]  R. Crowther Orbital debris: a growing threat to space operations , 2003, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  Luciano Anselmo,et al.  Characterization of abandoned rocket body families for active removal , 2016 .

[7]  Holger Krag,et al.  Development of a Debris Index , 2018 .

[8]  Alessandro Rossi,et al.  Analysis of the consequences of fragmentations in low and geostationary orbits , 2016 .

[9]  Alessandro Rossi,et al.  The Criticality of Spacecraft Index , 2015 .

[10]  C. Bombardelli,et al.  TIME ELEMENTS FOR ENHANCED PERFORMANCE OF THE DROMO ORBIT PROPAGATOR , 2014 .

[11]  Claudio Bombardelli,et al.  Non-singular orbital elements for special perturbations in the two-body problem , 2015 .

[12]  Alessandro Rossi,et al.  The New Space Debris Mitigation (SDM 4.0) Long Term Evolution Code , 2009 .

[13]  Carmen Pardini,et al.  Physical properties and long-term evolution of the debris clouds produced by two catastrophic collisions in Earth orbit , 2011 .

[14]  C. Bombardelli,et al.  Ion Beam Shepherd for Contactless Space Debris Removal , 2011, 1102.1289.

[15]  D. Drob,et al.  Nrlmsise-00 Empirical Model of the Atmosphere: Statistical Comparisons and Scientific Issues , 2002 .