Preference for conditioned reinforcement.

Pigeons were presented with a concurrent-chains schedule in which both choice alternatives led to the same terminal-link stimulus, which was followed by food. Superimposed on the food-reinforced presentations of the terminal-link stimulus was a second schedule of presentations of the same stimulus that were followed by no food. The absolute number of these no-food stimulus presentations was held constant while their relative frequency assigned to one or the other choice alternative was systematically varied. Preference for a given choice alternative tracked the relative frequency of these stimulus presentations, thus demonstrating that they served as reinforcers. These results resolve conflicts in the literature regarding the effect of conditioned reinforcement on choice.

[1]  R J HERRNSTEIN,et al.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement. , 1961, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[2]  E. Fantino,et al.  Effects on choice of reinforcement delay and conditioned reinforcement. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[3]  E Fantino,et al.  Effects of required rates of responding upon choice. , 1968, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[4]  J. E. Mazur Probability and delay of reinforcement as factors in discrete-trial choice. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[5]  O. J. Sizemore,et al.  Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  R. Church,et al.  Scalar expectancy theory and choice between delayed rewards. , 1988, Psychological review.

[7]  E Fantino,et al.  Choice: Some quantitative relations. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[8]  Devaluation of stimuli contingent on choice: evidence for conditioned reinforcement. , 1987, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  E. Fantino,et al.  Unification of models for choice between delayed reinforcers. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[10]  R. Dunn Timeout from concurrent schedules. , 1990, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[11]  J. E. Mazur Tests of an equivalence rule for fixed and variable reinforcer delays. , 1984 .

[12]  P R Killeen,et al.  Incentive theory: II. Models for choice. , 1982, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[13]  The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement. , 1976, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[14]  N Squires,et al.  A model for choice in simple concurrent and concurrent-chains schedules. , 1971, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[15]  W. Vaughan Choice: A local analysis. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  L. Gollub,et al.  INFORMATION ON CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT , 1970 .

[17]  Edmund Fantino,et al.  Self-control and general models of choice. , 1976 .

[18]  J. E. Mazur Fixed and variable ratios and delays: further tests of an equivalence rule. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.