Experimental study of a DMD based compressive line sensing imaging system in the turbulence environment

The Compressive Line Sensing (CLS) active imaging system has been demonstrated to be effective in scattering mediums, such as coastal turbid water, fog and mist, through simulations and test tank experiments. The CLS prototype hardware consists of a CW laser, a DMD, a photomultiplier tube, and a data acquisition instrument. CLS employs whiskbroom imaging formation that is compatible with traditional survey platforms. The sensing model adopts the distributed compressive sensing theoretical framework that exploits both intra-signal sparsity and highly correlated nature of adjacent areas in a natural scene. During sensing operation, the laser illuminates the spatial light modulator DMD to generate a series of 1D binary sensing pattern from a codebook to “encode” current target line segment. A single element detector PMT acquires target reflections as encoder output. The target can then be recovered using the encoder output and a predicted on-target codebook that reflects the environmental interference of original codebook entries. In this work, we investigated the effectiveness of the CLS imaging system in a turbulence environment. Turbulence poses challenges in many atmospheric and underwater surveillance applications. A series of experiments were conducted in the Naval Research Lab’s optical turbulence test facility with the imaging path subjected to various turbulence intensities. The total-variation minimization sparsifying basis was used in imaging reconstruction. The preliminary experimental results showed that the current imaging system was able to recover target information under various turbulence strengths. The challenges of acquiring data through strong turbulence environment and future enhancements of the system will be discussed.

[1]  Fraser Dalgleish,et al.  Synchronous Laser Line Scanners for Undersea Imaging Applications , 2011 .

[2]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  NESTA: A Fast and Accurate First-Order Method for Sparse Recovery , 2009, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[3]  E. Candès,et al.  Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements , 2005, math/0503066.

[4]  Gary D. Gilbert,et al.  Optical Turbulence In The Sea , 1971, Other Conferences.

[5]  Jules S. Jaffe,et al.  Computer modeling and the design of optimal underwater imaging systems , 1990 .

[6]  R. A. McDonald,et al.  Noiseless Coding of Correlated Information Sources , 1973 .

[7]  T J Kulp,et al.  Development and testing of a synchronous-scanning underwater imaging system capable of rapid two-dimensional frame imaging. , 1993, Applied optics.

[8]  Fraser Dalgleish,et al.  Experimental studies of the compressive line sensing underwater serial imaging system , 2014, Sensing Technologies + Applications.

[9]  Walter M. Duncan,et al.  Emerging digital micromirror device (DMD) applications , 2003, SPIE MOEMS-MEMS.

[10]  Massimo Fornasier,et al.  Compressive Sensing , 2015, Handbook of Mathematical Methods in Imaging.

[11]  Fraser Dalgleish,et al.  Compressive line sensing underwater imaging system , 2014 .

[12]  Bing Ouyang,et al.  Compressive sensing underwater laser serial imaging system , 2013, J. Electronic Imaging.

[13]  Weilin Hou,et al.  A simple underwater imaging model. , 2009, Optics letters.

[14]  W. Hou,et al.  Optical turbulence on underwater image degradation in natural environments. , 2012, Applied optics.

[15]  B. C. Redman,et al.  Streak Tube Imaging LIDAR (STIL) for 3-D Imaging of Terrestrial Targets , 2000 .

[16]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[17]  Richard G. Baraniuk,et al.  Distributed Compressed Sensing Dror , 2005 .

[18]  Aaron D. Wyner,et al.  The rate-distortion function for source coding with side information at the decoder , 1976, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[19]  Aggelos K. Katsaggelos,et al.  Compressive Blind Image Deconvolution , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.