A high resolution agent-based model to support walk-bicycle infrastructure investment decisions: A case study with New York City

Abstract Active transportation modes–walk and bicycle–are central for low carbon transport, healthy living, and complete streets initiative. Building a community with amenable walk and bicycle facilities asks for smart planning and investments. It is critical to investigate the impact of infrastructure building or expansion on the overall walk and bicycle mode usage prior to making investment choices utilizing public tax money. This research developed a high performance agent-based model to support investment decisions that allows to assess the impact of changes in walk-bike infrastructures at a fine spatial resolution (e.g., block group level). We built the agent-based model (ABM) in Repast-HPC platform and calibrated the model using Simultaneous Perturbation Stochastic Simulation (SPSA) technique. The ABM utilizes data from a synthetic population simulator that generates agents with corresponding socio-demographic characteristics, and integrates facility attributes regarding walking and bicycling such as sidewalk width and total length bike lane into the mode choice decision making process. Moreover, the ABM accounts for the effect of social interactions among agents who share identical home and work geographic locations. Finally, GIS-based maps are developed at block group resolution that allows examining the effect of walk-bike infrastructure related investments. The results from New York City case study indicate that infrastructure investments such as widening sidewalk and increasing bike lane network can positively influence the active transportation mode choices. Also, the impact varies with geographic locations–different boroughs of New York City will have different impacts. Our ABM simulation results also indicate that social promotions foucsing on active transportation can positively reinforce the impacts of infrastructure changes.

[1]  Hao Chen,et al.  Multi-step prediction of experienced travel times using agent-based modeling , 2016 .

[2]  Andrea Milne,et al.  Bicycling and Walking in the United States: 2014 Benchmarking Report , 2014 .

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter.  Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  K. Teschke,et al.  Motivators and deterrents of bicycling: comparing influences on decisions to ride , 2011 .

[5]  Ke Zhang,et al.  An agent-based choice model for travel mode and departure time and its case study in Beijing , 2016 .

[6]  Matthias Kowald,et al.  Modelling contact mode and frequency of interactions with social network members using the multiple discrete–continuous extreme value model , 2017 .

[7]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Modeling the Influence of Family, Social Context, and Spatial Proximity on Use of Nonmotorized Transport Mode , 2011 .

[8]  C. Cirillo,et al.  Generalized behavioral framework for choice models of social influence: Behavioral and data concerns in travel behavior , 2015 .

[9]  Robert B. Noland,et al.  Walking frequency, cars, dogs, and the built environment , 2011 .

[10]  A. D. Diez Roux,et al.  A spatial agent-based model for the simulation of adults' daily walking within a city. , 2011, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  D. Scott,et al.  Active-transport walking behavior: destinations, durations, distances , 2013 .

[12]  Kelly R Evenson,et al.  Examining the impact of the walking school bus with an agent-based model. , 2014, American journal of public health.

[13]  Joan L. Walker,et al.  Discrete choice with social and spatial network interdependencies: An empirical example using mixed generalized extreme value models with field and panel effects , 2005 .

[14]  D. McFadden.  The Choice Theory Approach to Market Research , 1986 .

[15]  S. D. Hill,et al.  SPSA/SIMMOD optimization of air traffic delay cost , 1997, Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041).

[16]  Frank Goetzke,et al.  Walkability as a Summary Measure in a Spatially Autoregressive Mode Choice Model: An Instrumental Variable Approach , 2010 .

[17]  D. McFadden,et al.  MIXED MNL MODELS FOR DISCRETE RESPONSE , 2000 .

[18]  Itzhak Benenson,et al.  Exploring cruising using agent-based and analytical models of parking , 2013 .

[19]  K. Train.  Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation , 2003 .

[20]  J Michael Oakes,et al.  Commentary: advancing neighbourhood-effects research--selection, inferential support, and structural confounding. , 2006, International journal of epidemiology.

[21]  Deborah Salon,et al.  Neighborhoods, Cars, and Commuting in New York City: A Discrete Choice Approach , 2008 .

[22]  K. Kockelman,et al.  Models for Anticipating Non-motorized Travel Choices, and Role of the Built Environment , 2014 .

[23]  Li Yin,et al.  Assessing Walkability in the City of Buffalo: Application of Agent-Based Simulation , 2013 .

[24]  B. Saelens,et al.  Built environment correlates of walking: a review. , 2008, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[25]  Jan Gehl,et al.  Life Between Buildings: Using Public Space , 2003 .

[26]  Shalabh Bhatnagar,et al.  Stochastic Recursive Algorithms for Optimization , 2012 .

[27]  M. Wardman,et al.  Factors influencing the propensity to cycle to work , 2007 .

[28]  Michael Batty,et al.  Mining bicycle sharing data for generating insights into sustainable transport systems , 2014 .

[29]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Network Traffic Control in Cyber-Transportation Systems Accounting for User-Level Fairness , 2016, J. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[30]  Thomas Parisini,et al.  Nonlinear modeling of complex large-scale plants using neural networks and stochastic approximation , 1997, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[31]  Xuesong Zhou,et al.  Personalized real-time traffic information provision: Agent-based optimization model and solution framework , 2016 .

[32]  Michael J. North,et al.  Modeling Endogenous Coordination Using a Dynamic Language , 2008, WCSS.

[33]  J. Spall.  Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic optimization , 1998 .

[34]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Self-Selection in the Relationship between the Built Environment and Walking: Empirical Evidence from Northern California , 2006 .

[35]  J. Sallis,et al.  Role of Built Environments in Physical Activity, Obesity, and Cardiovascular Disease , 2012, Circulation.

[36]  Roger Johansson,et al.  Vision Zero – Implementing a policy for traffic safety , 2009 .

[37]  Charles M. Macal,et al.  Multiscale agent-based consumer market modeling , 2010 .

[38]  Anne Vernez Moudon,et al.  The 3Ds + R: Quantifying Land Use and Urban Form Correlates of Walking , 2006 .

[39]  Maria Bordagaray,et al.  Capturing the conditions that introduce systematic variation in bike-sharing travel behavior using data mining techniques , 2016 .

[40]  Ali Cinar,et al.  A multi-agent approach using perceptron-based learning for robust operation of distributed chemical reactor networks , 2011, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[41]  Pamela Murray-Tuite,et al.  A-RESCUE: An Agent based Regional Evacuation Simulator Coupled with User Enriched Behavior , 2017 .

[42]  Satoshi Fujii,et al.  Mass effects and mobility decisions , 2013 .

[43]  Reid Ewing,et al.  Travel and the Built Environment , 2010 .

[44]  Araz Taeihagh,et al.  A Virtual Environment for the Formulation of Policy Packages , 2014 .

[45]  A. Bauman,et al.  Neighborhood walkability and the walking behavior of Australian adults. , 2007, American journal of preventive medicine.

[46]  Robert N. Stewart,et al.  Exploring the impact of walk–bike infrastructure, safety perception, and built-environment on active transportation mode choice: a random parameter model using New York City commuter data , 2018 .

[47]  Michael J. North,et al.  Parallel agent-based simulation with Repast for High Performance Computing , 2013, Simul..

[48]  R Elvik,et al.  Can injury prevention efforts go too far? Reflections on some possible implications of Vision Zero for road accident fatalities. , 1999, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[49]  Michael J. North,et al.  Complex adaptive systems modeling with Repast Simphony , 2013, Complex Adapt. Syst. Model..

[50]  Paul Schimek,et al.  Extent and correlates of walking in the USA , 2007 .

[51]  Kay W. Axhausen,et al.  High-resolution destination choice in agent-based demand models , 2011 .

[52]  Ahmed M El-Geneidy,et al.  Measuring Nonmotorized Accessibility: Issues, Alternatives, and Execution , 2008 .

[53]  Barbara P. Buttenfield,et al.  Dasymetric Modeling and Uncertainty , 2014, Annals of the Association of American Geographers. Association of American Geographers.

[54]  Shuo-Yan Chou,et al.  Dynamic parking negotiation and guidance using an agent-based platform , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[55]  Asha Weinstein Agrawal,et al.  How Far, by Which Route and Why? A Spatial Analysis of Pedestrian Preference , 2007 .

[56]  J. Spall.  Multivariate stochastic approximation using a simultaneous perturbation gradient approximation , 1992 .

[57]  M. Fu,et al.  Optimization of discrete event systems via simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation , 1997 .

[58]  Itzhak Benenson,et al.  PARKAGENT: An agent-based model of parking in the city , 2008, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[59]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .

[60]  P. Plaut.  Non-motorized commuting in the US , 2005 .

[61]  Rui J. P. de Figueiredo,et al.  Learning rules for neuro-controller via simultaneous perturbation , 1997, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks.

[62]  Yusak O. Susilo,et al.  Examining the impact of weather variability on non-commuters’ daily activity–travel patterns in different regions of Sweden , 2014 .

[63]  Susan L Handy,et al.  Factors Correlated with Bicycle Commuting: A Study in Six Small U.S. Cities , 2011 .

[64]  H. Robbins.  A Stochastic Approximation Method , 1951 .

[65]  Gernot Liedtke,et al.  Principles of Micro-Behavior Commodity Transport Modeling , 2009 .