A hybrid approach for identifying factors affecting driver reaction time using naturalistic driving data

Abstract The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) estimates that 80% of the deaths and injuries resulting from rear-end collisions could be prevented by the use of advanced collision avoidance systems. While autonomous or higher-level vehicles will be equipped with this technology by default, most of the vehicles on our roadways will lack these advances, so rear-end crashes will dominate accident statistics for many years to come. However, a simple and cost-effective in-vehicle device that uses predictive tools and real-time driver-behavior and roadway data can significantly reduce the likelihood of these crashes. In this paper, we propose a hybrid physics/data-driven approach that can be used in a kinematic-based forward-collision warning system. In particular, we use a hierarchical regularized regression model to estimate driver reaction time based on individual driver characteristics, driving behavior, and surrounding driving conditions. This personalized reaction time is input into the Brill’s one-dimensional car-following model to calculate the critical distance for collision warning. We use the Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP-2)’s Naturalistic Driving Study (NDS) data, the largest and most comprehensive study of its kind, to model driver brake-to-stop response time. The results show that the inclusion of driver characteristics increases model precision in predicting driver reaction times.

[1]  G T Taoka BREAK REACTION TIMES OF UNALERTED DRIVERS , 1989 .

[2]  Francis Tuerlinckx,et al.  A hierarchical approach for fitting curves to response time measurements , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[3]  Marc Green Perception-Reaction Time: Is Olson (and Sivak) All You Need to Know? , 2009 .

[4]  Christophe Ambroise,et al.  Feature selection in robust clustering based on Laplace mixture , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[5]  Petros A. Ioannou,et al.  Personalized Driver/Vehicle Lane Change Models for ADAS , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[6]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[7]  R W Allen,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF PERFORMANCE SPECIFICATIONS FOR COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS FOR LANE CHANGE, MERGING AND BACKING. TASK 1 INTERIM REPORT: CRASH PROBLEM ANALYSIS , 1994 .

[8]  Wassim G. Najm,et al.  Feasibility of Driver Judgment as Basis for a Crash Avoidance Database , 2002 .

[9]  J. Pearl Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference , 2000 .

[10]  Jonathan M. Hankey,et al.  Description of the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Database and the Crash, Near-Crash, and Baseline Data Sets , 2016 .

[11]  Michael Sivak,et al.  Radar-Measured Reaction Times of Unalerted Drivers to Brake Signals , 1982 .

[12]  Xiaoliang Ma,et al.  Estimation of Driver Reaction Time from Car-Following Data , 2006 .

[13]  G. Johansson,et al.  Drivers' Brake Reaction Times , 1971, Human factors.

[14]  Edward A. Brill A Car-Following Model Relating Reaction Times and Temporal Headways to Accident Frequency , 1972 .

[15]  G. Taoka Brake Reaction Times ofUnalerted Drivers , 1997 .

[16]  Jeroen Hogema,et al.  TIME-TO-COLLISION AND COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[17]  Jonathan M Hankey,et al.  A method for evaluating collision avoidance systems using naturalistic driving data. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  John Hourdos,et al.  Outline for a causal model of traffic conflicts and crashes. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Indrajit Chatterjee,et al.  Use of Naturalistic Driving Data to Characterize Driver Behavior in Freeway Shockwaves , 2014 .

[20]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  Regularization Paths for Generalized Linear Models via Coordinate Descent. , 2010, Journal of statistical software.

[21]  R Graham,et al.  THE EFFECT OF A COLLISION AVOIDANCE SYSTEM ON DRIVERS' BRAKING RESPONSES , 1994 .

[22]  Mohan M. Trivedi,et al.  Towards cooperative, predictive driver assistance , 2013, 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2013).