Determining a Maximum‐Tolerated Schedule of a Cytotoxic Agent

Most phase I clinical trials are designed to determine a maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) for one initial administration or treatment course of a cytotoxic experimental agent. Toxicity usually is defined as the indicator of whether one or more particular adverse events occur within a short time period from the start of therapy. However, physicians often administer an agent to the patient repeatedly and monitor long-term toxicity due to cumulative effects. We propose a new method for such settings. It is based on the time to toxicity rather than a binary outcome, and the goal is to determine a maximum-tolerated schedule (MTS) rather than a conventional MTD. The model and method account for a patient's entire sequence of administrations, with the overall hazard of toxicity modeled as the sum of a sequence of hazards, each associated with one administration. Data monitoring and decision making are done continuously throughout the trial. We illustrate the method with an allogeneic bone marrow transplantation (BMT) trial to determine how long a recombinant human growth factor can be administered as prophylaxis for acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD), and we present a simulation study in the context of this trial.

[1]  S Zacks,et al.  Cancer phase I clinical trials: efficient dose escalation with overdose control. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  D. Lacey,et al.  Keratinocyte growth factor administered before conditioning ameliorates graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in mice. , 1998, Blood.

[3]  D. Lacey,et al.  Keratinocyte growth factor protects mice from chemotherapy and radiation-induced gastrointestinal injury and mortality. , 1998, Cancer research.

[4]  C. Serdar,et al.  Randomized phase I trial of recombinant human keratinocyte growth factor plus chemotherapy: potential role as mucosal protectant. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  Y K Cheung,et al.  Sequential Designs for Phase I Clinical Trials with Late‐Onset Toxicities , 2000, Biometrics.

[6]  J. Crawford,et al.  Keratinocyte growth factor separates graft-versus-leukemia effects from graft-versus-host disease. , 1999, Blood.

[7]  P F Thall,et al.  A strategy for dose-finding and safety monitoring based on efficacy and adverse outcomes in phase I/II clinical trials. , 1998, Biometrics.

[8]  S. Goodman,et al.  Some practical improvements in the continual reassessment method for phase I studies. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[9]  B E Storer,et al.  Design and analysis of phase I clinical trials. , 1989, Biometrics.

[10]  Christian P. Robert,et al.  Monte Carlo Statistical Methods , 2005, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[11]  T. Braun,et al.  Determining a maximum tolerated cumulative dose: dose reassignment within the TITE-CRM. , 2003, Controlled clinical trials.

[12]  J O'Quigley,et al.  Continual reassessment method: a practical design for phase 1 clinical trials in cancer. , 1990, Biometrics.