The Contingent Role of Centrality in IT Network Governance: An Empirical Examination

Since the importance of collaboration across organizational boundaries for firms’ competitive success continues to grow dramatically, research on inter-organizational relationships has become prominent in business and information systems (IS) research. Particularly inter-organizational networks have been widely recognized by both academics and practitioners as an important form of multi-organizational governance. Those networks rely heavily on integrated information systems in order to generate value from co-creation, co-development, and co-innovation. Therefore, the integration of IS across partnering organizations has become the backbone of collaboration in inter-organizational networks. Despite the efforts invested in the field of IT governance arrangements, research still lacks empirical evidence on the relationship between governance choices and different internal and external network factors and their influence on governance effectiveness. Thus, this study sets out to expand the understanding of how network organizations can effectively develop and manage IS integration in order to co-create value. It contributes with a characterization of IT network governance arrangements along the dimension from highly centralized to highly decentralized IT related decision making in networks. Moreover, by drawing on contingency theory this paper develops a theoretical model proposing effective governance arrangements according to six contingency variables. A multiple case study methodology is applied in order to validate the theoretical relationships, and the data supports the basic structure of the research model. Our findings suggest that network size, network structure centralization, functional diversity, network trust, IT infusion, and IT competence are important factors for the understanding of effective IT governance arrangements in inter-organizational networks. The paper offers insights into the causal mechanisms behind the theoretical relationships and is a first step towards a more differentiated perspective on contingent governance structures in inter-organizational networks.

[1]  Nelson E. King,et al.  Exploring the impact of operating model choice on the governance of inter-organizational workflow: the U.S. e-prescribing network , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[2]  Lutz Kolbe,et al.  IT Governance in a Network Context: Literature Review and Agenda for Research , 2013, AMCIS.

[3]  Udo Staber,et al.  Inter-firm Co-operation and Competition in Industrial Districts , 1998 .

[4]  Sue R. Faerman,et al.  UNDERSTANDING INTERORGANIZATIONAL COOPERATION: PUBLIC-PRIVATE COLLABORATION IN REGULATING FINANCIAL MARKET INNOVATION. , 1999 .

[5]  Simon Trang,et al.  The Role Of Motivational Factors In Distributed Software Development Teams: An Empirical Investigation , 2013, ECIS.

[6]  Hamid Tavakolian,et al.  Linking the Information Technology Structure with Organizational Competitive Strategy: A Survey , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  G. Paré Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Study Research , 2004 .

[8]  Steven De Haes,et al.  Inter-Organizational Governance of Information Technology: Learning from a Global Multi-Business-Unit Environment , 2012, Int. J. IT Bus. Alignment Gov..

[9]  E. Lewis,et al.  Applying Organizational Theories to Realize Adaptive IT Governance and Service Management , 2009 .

[10]  Guy Paré,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Positivist Case Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[11]  Matthias Boehm,et al.  Dependency-based IT Governance practices in inter-organisational collaborations: A graph-driven elaboration , 2012, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[12]  Acklesh Prasad,et al.  IT Governance in Collaborative Organizational Structures , 2011, AMCIS.

[13]  Acklesh Prasad,et al.  On Governing Collaborative Information Technology (IT): A Relational Perspective , 2013, J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  K. Provan,et al.  Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness , 2007 .

[15]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Arrangements for Information Technology Governance: A Theory of Multiple Contingencies , 1999, MIS Q..

[16]  Sebastian Zander,et al.  Examining IT Alignment in Inter-Organizational Networks: Development and Application of a Measurment Instrument , 2014, PACIS.

[17]  François Bergeron,et al.  Interorganizational Governance of Information Technology , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Going Concerns: The Governance of Interorganizational Coordination Hubs , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  R. Peterson Integration Strategies and Tactics for Information Technology Governance , 2004 .

[20]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[21]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  How Information Technology Governance Mechanisms and Strategic Alignment Influence Organizational Performance: Insights from a Matched Survey of Business and IT Managers , 2015, MIS Q..

[22]  Kang Xie,et al.  Inter-firm IT governance in power-imbalanced buyer–supplier dyads: exploring how it works and why it lasts , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[23]  Carol V. Brown,et al.  Reconceptualizing the Context-Design Issue for the Information Systems Function , 1998 .

[24]  Gerald G. Grant,et al.  Framing the Frameworks: A Review of IT Governance Research , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[25]  L. Diamond IT Governance : How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results , 2005 .

[26]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[27]  P. Weill,et al.  IT Governance , 2017 .

[28]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  Governing IT in inter-organizational relationships: Issues and future research , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Katrien G. Luijkx,et al.  The Relationship Between Governance Roles and Performance in Local Public Interorganizational Networks , 2012 .

[30]  Markus Burger,et al.  How Interorganizational Networks Can Become Path-Dependent: Bargaining Practices in the Photonics Industry , 2014 .

[31]  KA Thleen,et al.  Building Theories from Case Study , 2007 .

[32]  C. Oliver,et al.  Organizations Working Together , 1992 .

[33]  Akbar Zaheer,et al.  Trust as an Organizing Principle Bill McEvily , 2003 .

[34]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box , 2009 .

[35]  Thiagarajan Ravichandran,et al.  Governance of Interorganizational Information Systems: A Resource Dependence Perspective , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[36]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  IT Governance in Collaborative Networks: A Socio-Technical Perspective , 2012, Pac. Asia J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[37]  Phillip Ein-Dor,et al.  Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence , 1982, MIS Q..

[38]  Philipp Mayring Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse : Grundlagen und Techniken , 2003 .

[39]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[40]  Peter Weill,et al.  An Assessment of the Contingency Theory of Management Information Systems , 1989, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..