Culturally aware Planning and Execution of Robot Actions

The way in which humans behave, speak and interact is deeply influenced by their culture. For example, greeting is done differently in France, in Sweden or in Japan; and the average interpersonal distance changes from one cultural group to the other. In order to successfully coexist with humans, robots should also adapt their behavior to the culture, customs and manners of the persons they interact with. In this paper, we deal with an important ingredient of cultural adaptation: how to generate robot plans that respect given cultural preferences, and how to execute them in a way that is sensitive to those preferences. We present initial results in this direction in the context of the CARESSES project, a joint EU-Japan effort to build culturally competent assistive robots.

[1]  M. Joosse,et al.  Cultural differences in how an engagement-seeking robot should approach a group of people , 2014, CABS '14.

[2]  Lars Karlsson,et al.  Inferring Context and Goals for Online Human-Aware Planning , 2015, 2015 IEEE 27th International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI).

[3]  Lars Karlsson,et al.  Grandpa Hates Robots - Interaction Constraints for Planning in Inhabited Environments , 2014, AAAI.

[4]  Erina Ferro,et al.  The UniversAAL Platform for AAL (Ambient Assisted Living) , 2015, J. Intell. Syst..

[5]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Perception of an Android Robot in Japan and Australia: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2014, ICSR.

[6]  Stephen F. Smith,et al.  A Constraint-Based Method for Project Scheduling with Time Windows , 2002, J. Heuristics.

[7]  Jaap Ham,et al.  Investigating the Effect of Relative Cultural Distance on the Acceptance of Robots , 2015, ICSR.

[8]  Irena Papadopoulos,et al.  Transcultural Health and Social Care: development of culturally competent practitioners , 2006 .

[9]  Sean Andrist,et al.  Effects of Culture on the Credibility of Robot Speech: A Comparison between English and Arabic , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[10]  Rüdiger Heimgärtner,et al.  Reflections on a Model of Culturally Influenced Human–Computer Interaction to Cover Cultural Contexts in HCI Design , 2013, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[11]  Seiichiro Matsumoto,et al.  Echonet: A Home Network Standard , 2010, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[12]  Alessandro Saffiotti,et al.  A framework for culture-aware robots based on fuzzy logic , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE).

[13]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics , 2005 .

[14]  Gerhard Goos,et al.  Cross-Cultural Design , 2016, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[15]  James F. Allen.  Towards a General Theory of Action and Time , 1984, Artif. Intell..

[16]  Uwe Köckemann,et al.  Constraint-based Methods for Human-aware Planning , 2016 .

[17]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Culturally Variable Preferences for Robot Design and Use in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  Ana Paiva,et al.  Modeling culture in intelligent virtual agents , 2016, Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems.

[19]  Rodolphe Gelin,et al.  A Mass-Produced Sociable Humanoid Robot: Pepper: The First Machine of Its Kind , 2018, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[20]  M. Leininger,et al.  Transcultural nursing : concepts, theories, research and practices , 1995 .

[21]  Alfons Trompenaars,et al.  Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business , 1993 .

[22]  Mohammad Obaid,et al.  Investigating the influence of culture on proxemic behaviors for humanoid robots , 2013, 2013 IEEE RO-MAN.

[23]  Tatsuya Nomura.  Cultural differences in social acceptance of robots , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[24]  Julian Frommel,et al.  Modeling and Evaluating a Bayesian Network of Culture-Dependent Behaviors , 2015, 2015 International Conference on Culture and Computing (Culture Computing).

[25]  Pei-Luen Patrick Rau,et al.  When in Rome: The role of culture & context in adherence to robot recommendations , 2010, 2010 5th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[26]  Itay Meiri,et al.  Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Constraints in Temporal Reasoning , 1991, Artif. Intell..

[27]  Vanessa Evers,et al.  Relational vs. group self-construal: Untangling the role of national culture in HRI , 2008, 2008 3rd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[28]  Torkil Clemmensen,et al.  An Overview of a Decade of Journal Publications about Culture and Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) , 2009, HWID.

[29]  Y. Aharoni.  Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind , 1992 .

[30]  Maha Salem,et al.  Marhaba, how may I help you? Effects of Politeness and Culture on Robot Acceptance and Anthropomorphization , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[31]  Christoph Bartneck,et al.  Who like androids more: Japanese or US Americans? , 2008, RO-MAN 2008 - The 17th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication.

[32]  Yuto Lim,et al.  Paving the way for culturally competent robots: A position paper , 2017, 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).

[33]  Alexander Waibel,et al.  A Novel Greeting Selection System for a Culture-Adaptive Humanoid Robot , 2015 .