DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF PROMPTS AND RECASTS IN FORM-FOCUSED INSTRUCTION

Four teachers and their eight classes of 179 fifth-grade (10–11-year-old) students participated in this quasi-experimental classroom study, which investigated the effects of form-focused instruction (FFI) and corrective feedback on immersion students' ability to accurately assign grammatical gender in French. The FFI treatment, designed to draw attention to selected noun endings that reliably predict grammatical gender and to provide opportunities for practice in associating these endings with gender attribution, was implemented in the context of regular subject-matter instruction by three of the four teachers, each with two classes, for approximately 9 hours during a 5-week period, while the fourth teacher taught the same subject matter without FFI to two comparison classes. Additionally, each of the three FFI teachers implemented a different feedback treatment: recasts, prompts, or no feedback. Analyses of pretest, immediate-posttest, and delayed-posttest results showed a significant increase in the ability of students exposed to FFI to correctly assign grammatical gender. Results of the written tasks in particular, and to a lesser degree the oral tasks, revealed that FFI is more effective when combined with prompts than with recasts or no feedback, as a means of enabling L2 learners to acquire rule-based representations of grammatical gender and to proceduralize their knowledge of these emerging forms.This study was funded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (nos. 410-98-0175 and 410-2002-0988). Parts of this study were presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Applied Linguistics in Salt Lake City on April 7, 2002; the Congress of the Social Sciences and Humanities in Toronto on May 26, 2002; and at the Congress of the International Association for Applied Linguistics in Singapore on December 12, 2002. I am grateful to the participating teachers and their students, to Lucy Fazio for her role as research associate in the data collection, to José Correa for his assistance with the statistical analyses, and to the following research assistants for contributions to various phases of this research: Susan Ballinger, Kristina Eisenhower, Andréanne Gagné, Sophie Beaudoin, Laura-Annie Bouffard, France Bourassa, Sophie Bourgeois, Elisa David, Mélanie Mathieu, Sophie Prince, Andrea Sterzuk, and David Syncox. I gratefully acknowledge Leila Ranta, Iliana Panova, and four anonymous SSLA reviewers for their helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper.

[1]  W. Lambert,et al.  A psychological investigation of French speakers' skill with grammatical gender , 1968 .

[2]  John F. Fanselow.  The Treatment of Error in Oral Work. , 1977 .

[3]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[4]  W. Lambert,et al.  The French Speaker's Skill with Grammatical Gender: An Example of Rule-Governed Behavior , 1977 .

[5]  C. Chaudron.  A DESCRIPTIVE MODEL OF DISCOURSE IN THE CORRECTIVE TREATMENT OF LEARNERS' ERRORS1 , 1977 .

[6]  Maurice Grevisse,et al.  Nouvelle grammaire française , 1980 .

[7]  John R. Anderson.  Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications , 1980 .

[8]  R L Iman,et al.  Analysis of covariance using the rank transformation. , 1982, Biometrics.

[9]  John R. Anderson.  The Architecture of Cognition , 1983 .

[10]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Can Syntax be Taught? A Study of the Effects of Formal Instruction on the Acquisition of WH Questions by Children , 1984 .

[11]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Interlanguage is not a state of mind: An evaluation of the construct for second-language acquisition , 1985 .

[12]  M. Swain.  Communicative competence : Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development , 1985 .

[13]  Marie E. Surridge.  Genre grammatical et dérivation lexicale en français , 1986, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[14]  Wolfgang Klein.  Second Language Acquisition , 1986 .

[15]  B. Mclaughlin.  Theories of second-language learning , 1987 .

[16]  G. Logan.  Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[17]  Merrill Swain,et al.  Manipulating and Complementing Content Teaching To Maximize Second Language Learning , 1988 .

[18]  T. Pica.  Interlanguage Adjustments as an Outcome of NS‐NNS Negotiated Interaction , 1988 .

[19]  Susanne Carroll,et al.  Second-Language Acquisition and the Computational Paradigm* , 1989 .

[20]  Birgit Harley,et al.  Functional Grammar in French Immersion: A Classroom Experiment1 , 1989 .

[21]  J. Michael O'Malley,et al.  Learning strategies in second language acquisition , 1990 .

[22]  Jan H. Hulstijn,et al.  A Comparison Between the Information-Processing and the Analysis/Control Approaches to Language Learning1 , 1990 .

[23]  R. Schmidt.  The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[24]  Best Paper by a Graduate Student Award , 1990 .

[25]  Alec McHoul,et al.  The organization of repair in classroom talk , 1990, Language in Society.

[26]  Patrick Allen,et al.  The Development of Second Language Proficiency: Aspects of classroom treatment: toward a more comprehensive view of second language education , 1990 .

[27]  Elaine Day,et al.  Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion : An experimental study , 1991 .

[28]  R. Schmidt.  Psychological Mechanisms Underlying Second Language Fluency , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[29]  G. Marcus.  Negative evidence in language acquisition , 1993, Cognition.

[30]  Using French: A Guide to Contemporary Usage , 1993 .

[31]  P. Lightbown,et al.  Instruction and the Development of Questions in L2 Classrooms , 1993, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[32]  Jacques Rebuffot.  Le Point sur L'immersion au Canada (The Argument for...Immersion in Canada). , 1993 .

[33]  Peter Robinson,et al.  Instance Theory and Second Language Rule Learning under Explicit Conditions , 1993, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[34]  Roger Hawkins,et al.  Approaches to Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[35]  R. Lyster.  The Effect of Functional-Analytic Teaching on Aspects of French Immersion Students' Sociolinguistic Competence. , 1994 .

[36]  T. Pica.  Research on Negotiation: What Does It Reveal about Second-Language Learning Conditions, Processes, and Outcomes?. , 1994 .

[37]  M. Swain,et al.  Problems in Output and the Cognitive Processes They Generate: A Step Towards Second Language Learning , 1995, Applied Linguistics.

[38]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned , 1995 .

[39]  John S. Hedgcock,et al.  Negative Feedback Incorporation Among High-Proficiency and Low-Proficiency Chinese-Speaking Learners of Spanish , 1996 .

[40]  K. Bot.  The Psycholinguistics of the Output Hypothesis , 1996 .

[41]  Diane Musumeci,et al.  Teacher-Learner Negotiation in Content-Based Instruction: Communication at Cross-Purposes? , 1996 .

[42]  Michael H. Long.  The Role of the Linguistic Environment in Second Language Acquisition , 1996 .

[43]  Marie Surridge.  Le ou la? : the gender of French nouns , 1996 .

[44]  M. Swain.  French Immersion Programs in Canada , 1997 .

[45]  M. Saxton.  The Contrast Theory of negative input , 1997, Journal of Child Language.

[46]  N. Spada.  Form-Focussed Instruction and Second Language Acquisition: A Review of Classroom and Laboratory Research , 1997, Language Teaching.

[47]  Rod Ellis,et al.  SLA Research and Language Teaching , 1997 .

[48]  R. Lyster,et al.  CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK AND LEARNER UPTAKE , 1997, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[49]  R. Lyster.  Negotiation of Form, Recasts, and Explicit Correction in Relation to Error Types and Learner Repair in Immersion Classrooms , 1998 .

[50]  P. Skehan.  语言学习认知法 = A cognitive approach to language learning , 1998 .

[51]  Michael H. Long,et al.  The Role of Implicit Negative Feedback in SLA: Models and Recasts in Japanese and Spanish , 1998 .

[52]  R. Lyster.  RECASTS, REPETITION, AND AMBIGUITY IN L2 CLASSROOM DISCOURSE , 1998, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[53]  Roy Lyster,et al.  Immersion and Submersion Classrooms: A Comparison of Instructional Practices in Language Arts , 1998 .

[54]  Alison Mackey,et al.  Conversational Interaction and Second Language Development: Recasts, Responses, and Red Herrings? , 1998 .

[55]  C. Doughty.  Cognitive Underpinnings of Focus on Form , 1999 .

[56]  P. Bonate.  Analysis of pretest-posttest designs , 2000 .

[57]  Alison Mackey,et al.  HOW DO LEARNERS PERCEIVE INTERACTIONAL FEEDBACK? , 2000, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[58]  R. Dekeyser.  THE ROBUSTNESS OF CRITICAL PERIOD EFFECTS IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2000, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[59]  Kees de Bot,et al.  PSYCHOLINGUISTICS IN APPLIED LINGUISTICS: TRENDS AND PERSPECTIVES , 2000, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics.

[60]  P. Lightbown,et al.  Recasts as Feedback to Language Learners , 2001 .

[61]  R. Ellis.  Introduction: Investigating Form‐Focused Instruction , 2001 .

[62]  ZhaoHong Han.  A Study of the Impact of Recasts on Tense Consistency in L2 Output , 2002 .

[63]  Toshiyo Nabei,et al.  Learner Awareness of Recasts in Classroom Interaction: A Case Study of an Adult EFL Student's Second Language Learning , 2002 .

[64]  R. Lyster,et al.  Patterns of Corrective Feedback and Uptake in an Adult ESL Classroom , 2002 .

[65]  Roy Lyster,et al.  Negotiation in Immersion Teacher-Student Interaction. , 2002 .

[66]  Susan M. Braidi.  Reexamining the Role of Recasts in Native-Speaker/Nonnative-Speaker Interactions , 2002 .

[67]  T. Pica.  Subject-Matter Content: How Does It Assist the Interactional and Linguistic Needs of Classroom Language Learners? , 2002 .

[68]  J. Leeman.  RECASTS AND SECOND LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 2003, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[69]  D. Baca,et al.  A cognitive approach to language learning , 2006 .