Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact

We study the distributions of citations received by a single publication within several disciplines, spanning broad areas of science. We show that the probability that an article is cited c times has large variations between different disciplines, but all distributions are rescaled on a universal curve when the relative indicator cf = c/c0 is considered, where c0 is the average number of citations per article for the discipline. In addition we show that the same universal behavior occurs when citation distributions of articles published in the same field, but in different years, are compared. These findings provide a strong validation of cf as an unbiased indicator for citation performance across disciplines and years. Based on this indicator, we introduce a generalization of the h index suitable for comparing scientists working in different fields.

[1]  C. Cleverdon.  Citation Indexing , 1965, Nature.

[2]  S. Naranan.  POWER LAW RELATIONS IN SCIENCE BIBLIOGRAPHY—A SELF‐CONSISTENT INTERPRETATION , 1971 .

[3]  Eugene Garfield,et al.  Citation indexing - its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities , 1979 .

[4]  Terrence A. Brooks,et al.  Evidence of complex citer motivations , 1986, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[5]  Leo Egghe,et al.  Introduction to Informetrics: Quantitative Methods in Library, Documentation and Information Science , 1990 .

[6]  Paul Nicholls,et al.  Introduction to informetrics: Quantitative methods in library, documentation and information science , 1991 .

[7]  Per O. Seglen,et al.  The Skewness of Science , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[8]  S. Redner.  How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution , 1998, cond-mat/9804163.

[9]  V. Plerou,et al.  Similarities between the growth dynamics of university research and of competitive economic activities , 1999, Nature.

[10]  Competition amongst scientists for publication status:Toward a model of scientific publication and citation distributions , 2001 .

[11]  D. King.  The scientific impact of nations , 2004, Nature.

[12]  Anthony F. J. van Raan,et al.  Competition amongst scientists for publication status:Toward a model of scientific publication and citation distributions , 2001, Scientometrics.

[13]  Peter Vinkler.  Relations of relative scientometric indicators , 2004, Scientometrics.

[14]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Cross-field normalization of scientometric indicators , 1996, Scientometrics.

[15]  S. Redner.  Citation statistics from 110 years of physical review , 2005, physics/0506056.

[16]  Peter Vinkler,et al.  Model for quantitative selection of relative scientometric impact indicators , 1996, Scientometrics.

[17]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Relativity of citation performance and excellence measures: From cross-field to cross-scale effects of field-normalisation , 2005, Scientometrics.

[18]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  New bibliometric tools for the assessment of national research performance: Database description, overview of indicators and first applications , 1995, Scientometrics.

[19]  Matthew Sands.  Capturing the Wisdom of Feynman , 2005 .

[20]  Philip Ball,et al.  Index aims for fair ranking of scientists , 2005, Nature.

[21]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[22]  Tibor Braun,et al.  Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact , 1986, Scientometrics.

[23]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[24]  A. Kinney.  National scientific facilities and their science impact on nonbiomedical research , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Jonas Lundberg,et al.  Lifting the crown - citation z-score , 2007, J. Informetrics.

[26]  J. Hirsch.  Does the h index have predictive power? , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Juan E. Iglesias,et al.  Scaling the h-index for different scientific ISI fields , 2006, Scientometrics.

[28]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Scaling and universality in proportional elections. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[29]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior , 2008, J. Documentation.

[30]  Jonathan Adams.  The use of bibliometrics to measure research quality in UK higher education institutions , 2009, Archivum Immunologiae et Therapiae Experimentalis.

[31]  Peter Taylor,et al.  Citation Statistics , 2009, ArXiv.

[32]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  Differences in impact factor across fields and over time , 2008, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..