Micrometer-scale 3-D shape characterization of eight cements: Particle shape and cement chemistry, and the effect of particle shape on laser diffraction particle size measurement

Eight different portland cements were imaged on a synchrotron beam line at Brookhaven National Laboratory using X-ray microcomputed tomography at a voxel size of about 1 µm per cubic voxel edge. The particles ranged in size roughly between 10 µm and 100 µm. The shape and size of individual particles were computationally analyzed using spherical harmonic analysis. The particle shape difference between cements was small but significant, as judged by several different quantitative shape measures, including the particle length, width, and thickness distributions. It was found that the average shape of cement particles was closely correlated with the volume fraction of C3S (alite) and C2S (belite) making up the cement powder. It is shown that the non-spherical particle shape of the cements strongly influence laser diffraction results, at least in the sieve size range of 20 µm to 38 µm. Since laser diffraction particle size measurement is being increasingly used by the cement industry, while cement chemistry is always a main factor in cement production, these results could have important implications for how this kind of particle size measurement should be understood and used in the cement industry.

[1]  Daniel Quenard,et al.  The Visible Cement Data Set , 2002, Journal of research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

[2]  Jeffrey W. Bullard,et al.  Shape analysis of a reference cement , 2004 .

[3]  G. Mie Beiträge zur Optik trüber Medien, speziell kolloidaler Metallösungen , 1908 .

[4]  Jeffrey W. Bullard,et al.  Corrigendum to "Analysis of CCRL proficiency cements 151 and 152 using the virtual cement and concrete testing laboratory " (Cem. Concr. Res. (8) (2006) 1548-1555) , 2007 .

[5]  C. Laguerie,et al.  Response of Laser Diffraction Particle Sizer to Anisometric Particles , 1994 .

[6]  Hideo Yamamoto,et al.  Transformation of Diffraction Pattern due to Ellipsoids into Equivalent Diameter Distribution for Spheres , 2000 .

[7]  M. Stampanoni,et al.  3D experimental investigation of the microstructure of cement pastes using synchrotron X-ray microtomography (μCT) , 2007 .

[8]  E. Garboczi,et al.  Intrinsic viscosity and the electrical polarizability of arbitrarily shaped objects. , 2001, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[9]  Garboczi,et al.  Intrinsic conductivity of objects having arbitrary shape and conductivity. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[10]  Larry D. Travis,et al.  Light scattering by nonspherical particles : theory, measurements, and applications , 1998 .

[11]  E. Garboczi,et al.  Intrinsic Viscosity and the Polarizability of Particles Having a Wide Range of Shapes , 2007 .

[12]  G. Pólya,et al.  Isoperimetric inequalities in mathematical physics , 1951 .

[13]  J. Bullard,et al.  Shape Comparison Between 0.42.0 and 2060 lm Cement Particles , 2010 .

[14]  Eric N. Landis,et al.  X-ray microtomographic studies of pore structure and permeability in Portland cement concrete , 2005 .

[15]  David W. Fowler,et al.  Determination of Aggregate Shape Properties Using X-ray Tomographic Methods and the Effect of Shape on Concrete Rheology , 2005 .

[16]  John G. Hagedorn,et al.  Three-dimensional shape analysis of coarse aggregates : New techniques for and preliminary results on several different coarse aggregates and reference rocks , 2006 .

[17]  Chiara F. Ferraris,et al.  Measurement of Particle Size Distribution In Portland Cement Powder: Analysis of ASTM Round-Robin Studies , 2004 .

[18]  David W. Fowler,et al.  Some properties of irregular 3-D particles , 2006 .

[19]  Denis Damidot,et al.  Determination by nanoindentation of elastic modulus and hardness of pure constituents of Portland cement clinker , 2001 .

[20]  David W. Fowler,et al.  Shape and size of microfine aggregates: X-ray microcomputed tomography vs. laser diffraction , 2007 .

[21]  P. Bowen,et al.  Particle size distribution measurement of anisotropic—particles cylinders and platelets—practical examples , 2002 .

[22]  O. Glatter,et al.  Determination of particle-size distribution functions from small-angle scattering data by means of the indirect transformation method , 1980 .

[23]  Eric L. Miller,et al.  Spherical harmonics microwave algorithm for shape and location reconstruction of breast cancer tumor , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  K. Sommer 40 Years of Presentation Particle Size Distributions–Yet Still Incorrect? , 2001 .

[25]  E. Garboczi Three-dimensional mathematical analysis of particle shape using X-ray tomography and spherical harmonics: Application to aggregates used in concrete , 2002 .

[26]  Avinash C. Kak,et al.  Principles of computerized tomographic imaging , 2001, Classics in applied mathematics.

[27]  Paul Bowen,et al.  Graphical comparison of image analysis and laser diffraction particle size analysis data obtained from the measurements of nonspherical particle systems , 2006, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[28]  L. Hills THE EFFECT OF CLINKER MICROSTRUCTURE ON GRINDABILITY: LITERATURE REVIEW DATABASE , 1995 .

[29]  Joanne M. R. Fernlund,et al.  The effect of particle form on sieve analysis: a test by image analysis , 1998 .

[30]  Kimberly E. Kurtis,et al.  Sulfate Attack Monitored by MicroCT and EDXRD: Influence of Cement Type, Water-To-Cement Ratio, and Aggregate , 2006 .

[31]  M. Grigoriu,et al.  Spherical harmonic-based random fields for aggregates used in concrete , 2006 .

[32]  Nicos Martys,et al.  Study of a dissipative particle dynamics based approach for modeling suspensions , 2005 .

[33]  Richard N. Kelly,et al.  Commerical reference shape standards use in the study of particle shape effect on laser diffraction particle size analysis , 2006, AAPS PharmSciTech.

[34]  H. V. Hulst Light Scattering by Small Particles , 1957 .

[35]  E. Dan Hirleman,et al.  Laser Diffraction Spectroscopy: Influence of Particle Shape and a Shape Adaptation Technique , 1998 .

[36]  R. Ketcham,et al.  Acquisition, optimization and interpretation of X-ray computed tomographic imagery: applications to the geosciences , 2001 .

[37]  Jeffrey W. Bullard,et al.  Analysis of CCRL proficiency cements 151 and 152 using the Virtual Cement and Concrete Testing Laboratory , 2006 .

[38]  J. C. Elliott,et al.  X‐ray microtomography , 1982, Journal of microscopy.