Scenario-based radiation therapy margins for patient setup, organ motion, and particle range uncertainty

This work extends and validates the scenario-based generalization of margins presented in Fredriksson and Bokrantz (2016 Phys. Med. Biol. 61 2067-82). Scenario-based margins are, in their original form, a method for robust planning under setup uncertainty where the sum of a plan evaluation criterion over a set of scenarios is optimized. The voxelwise penalties in the summands are weighted by a distribution of coefficients defined such that the method is mathematically equivalent to the use of conventional geometric margins if the scenario doses are calculated using the static dose cloud approximation. The purpose of this work is to extend scenario-based margins to general types of geometric uncertainty and to validate their use on clinical cases. Specifically, we outline how to incorporate density heterogeneity in the calculation of coefficients and demonstrate the extended method's ability to safeguard against setup errors, organ motion, and range shifts (and combinations thereof). For a water phantom with a high-density slab partly covering the target, the extended form of scenario-based margins method led to improved target coverage robustness compared to the original method. At most minor differences in robustness were, however, observed between the extended and original method for a prostate and two lung patients, all treated with intensity-modulated proton therapy, yielding evidence that the calculation of weighting coefficients is generally insensitive to tissue heterogeneities. The scenario-based margins were, furthermore, verified to provide a comparable level of robustness to expected value and worst case optimization while circumventing some known shortcomings of these methods.

[1]  P. Petti,et al.  Differential-pencil-beam dose calculations for charged particles. , 1992, Medical physics.

[2]  P M Evans,et al.  Assessing the effect of electron density in photon dose calculations. , 2006, Medical physics.

[3]  R L Siddon,et al.  Calculation of the radiological depth. , 1985, Medical physics.

[4]  Thomas Bortfeld,et al.  Reducing the sensitivity of IMPT treatment plans to setup errors and range uncertainties via probabilistic treatment planning. , 2008, Medical physics.

[5]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Degradation of proton depth dose distributions attributable to microstructures in lung-equivalent material. , 2015, Medical physics.

[6]  T. Purdie,et al.  Robust optimization methods for cardiac sparing in tangential breast IMRT. , 2015, Medical physics.

[7]  Albin Fredriksson,et al.  A characterization of robust radiation therapy treatment planning methods-from expected value to worst case optimization. , 2012, Medical physics.

[8]  C C Ling,et al.  Towards multidimensional radiotherapy (MD-CRT): biological imaging and biological conformality. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  R. Mohan,et al.  Differential pencil beam dose computation model for photons. , 1986, Medical physics.

[10]  Rasmus Bokrantz,et al.  Necessary and sufficient conditions for Pareto efficiency in robust multiobjective optimization , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  U Oelfke,et al.  Worst case optimization: a method to account for uncertainties in the optimization of intensity modulated proton therapy , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[12]  Marnix G Witte,et al.  Probabilistic objective functions for margin-less IMRT planning , 2013, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  A. Lomax,et al.  Is it necessary to plan with safety margins for actively scanned proton therapy? , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  John N Tsitsiklis,et al.  A robust approach to IMRT optimization , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  D L McShan,et al.  Inverse plan optimization accounting for random geometric uncertainties with a multiple instance geometry approximation (MIGA). , 2006, Medical physics.

[16]  Anders Forsgren,et al.  Minimax optimization for handling range and setup uncertainties in proton therapy. , 2011, Medical physics.

[17]  S. Henderson,et al.  Robust optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning under uncertainty , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  J. Unkelbach,et al.  Inclusion of organ movements in IMRT treatment planning via inverse planning based on probability distributions. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Rasmus Bokrantz,et al.  The scenario-based generalization of radiation therapy margins , 2015, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  Rasmus Bokrantz,et al.  A critical evaluation of worst case optimization methods for robust intensity-modulated proton therapy planning. , 2014, Medical physics.

[21]  E. Pedroni,et al.  Intensity modulated proton therapy: a clinical example. , 2001, Medical physics.

[22]  Indra J Das,et al.  Comparison of inhomogeneity correction algorithms in small photon fields. , 2005, Medical physics.

[23]  U. Oelfke,et al.  Two-dimensional pencil beam scaling: an improved proton dose algorithm for heterogeneous media. , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  Stephen J. Wright,et al.  Efficient schemes for robust IMRT treatment planning , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  Young-Bin Cho,et al.  Automated weekly replanning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervix cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.